Safety first If there is immediate danger, someone may be harmed, or you may not stay safe, call 911 now. For emotional crisis, call or text 988, or call the Maine Crisis Line at 1-888-568-1112. If abuse, coercive control, stalking, sexual assault, or child-safety concerns are involved, use the crisis page before forms, arguments, or public-record work. Safe-device reminder: if another person monitors this device, use a safer phone/computer, clear history only if safe, or call a live advocate.
Call 911 Call/text 988 Maine Crisis Line Open Crisis + Keep Safe

No private case intake: do not send child names, sealed records, private allegations, or confidential files through public campaign links. Privacy boundarySafety first

Site boundary: JTforME is the campaign, public-record, citizen-initiative, and Maine family-help routing hub. For volunteer-only public education, printable tools, and research/source materials, use FOCaF.

See boundaryOpen FOCaF tools
Read by functionCrisis + keep safeStart HereFind help fastFamily HubOfficial doorsTerms + BasicsPrepare + OrganizeForms + filingCourt command centerDHHS / OCFSChild support + stabilitySchool + providersCounty resource mapPDF chooserCourt weekAfter hearingDashboard · Dashboard 2.0Attorney accountabilityCourt accountabilitySources + ProofBriefs + DataFamily PlatformReform TrackerAdministration accountabilityStandardsStory IntakeBy audiencePackets + Guides
Start by need or audienceNeed crisis support now?For families + helpersFor press + officialsFor skepticsFor supporters + builders
Need help now?

Crisis support should stay closer than every other link on this site.

If child-access pressure, family-court pressure, or fear for safety is making today feel dangerous or unbearable, start with crisis support, counseling, and the cleanest Maine justice doors first.

Crisis + keep safeOfficial doorsStart here fastFind help fastSafety supportCourt weekHousing pressureFamily toolsPrepare + organizeForms + filingAfter hearing
Public review center

Review the initiative without turning public policy into private intake.

A single public-review lane for bill materials, change notes, risk issues, source discipline, and safe comment boundaries.

This is public education, public-record organization, and draft policy review. It is not legal advice, emergency help, private case intake, or an official ballot filing.

Public review center

Put the bill text, summary, FAQ, risks, source notes, and change log in one place.

The review center is designed so supporters, skeptics, reporters, legislators, and officials can understand what the proposed initiative is, what it is not, what changed, what remains risky, and how to comment without sending private case material.

Review indexSide-by-sideAccountability noticeComment rulesDownload index
Review index

What readers should know before commenting

Download: initiative_public_review_index.csv · Machine-readable: initiative-public-review-index.json

TopicPublic explanationUse rule
Draft statusThe rev08a materials are a public-review framework, not a filed citizen initiative.Keep pre-submission notice visible on every initiative page.
What changedThe revision narrows risky provisions and adds safety, due process, phased implementation, and capacity review.Use change log before publishing excerpts.
What critics may attackVagueness, punishment of protective reports, fiscal burden, court administration, and separation of powers.Answer with the red-team issue register and section map.
How to commentPublic comments should address language, implementation, safety exceptions, fiscal feasibility, and source quality.Do not send private child information, sealed records, or case-specific allegations.
Record-supported accountabilityPublic review may identify public officials, court personnel, agency personnel, and publicly compensated actors by name and title when the reference is grounded in court records, docket entries, official correspondence, public filings, or other record-supported materials.Use date, role, and record source; mark disputed facts as disputed; avoid personal attacks and unsupported motive claims.
Public accountability standard

Record-supported public accountability notice.

For avoidance of doubt, this public-review work may identify public officials, court personnel, agency personnel, and publicly compensated actors by name and title where their actions appear in court records, docket entries, official correspondence, public filings, or other record-supported materials.

Any such references will be made for purposes of accuracy, source attribution, public accountability, and institutional reform. They are not intended as personal attacks. Where a statement concerns disputed facts, the statement should identify the facts as disputed. Where a statement concerns a filed document, order, docket event, or official communication, the statement should describe it by date, role, and record source.

The point is not personality. The point is that children and families experience institutional harm through identifiable decisions, omissions, delays, procedural barriers, and implementation failures. Public accountability requires enough specificity that the pattern can be audited rather than dismissed as a generalized complaint.

Use names only when the record supports it.

Names and titles belong only where the source is a court record, docket entry, official correspondence, public filing, public compensation record, or another record-supported material.

Separate fact from dispute.

Filed documents, orders, docket events, and official communications should be described by date, role, and record source. Disputed facts should be marked as disputed.

Keep accountability institutional.

The purpose is accuracy, source attribution, public accountability, and institutional reform, not personal attacks or unsupported motive claims.

Privacy boundary: this standard does not invite private case intake. Do not publish child names, protected addresses, sealed records, medical or school records, confidential exhibits, or emergency requests through public campaign materials.
Download noticeEvidence standardPrivacy boundary
Side-by-side review

The public lane should compare what exists, what changes, and why.

Prior draft posture

  • Powerful reform frame.
  • Broad accountability language.
  • Multiple provisions likely to draw hostile legal, fiscal, safety, and implementation review.
  • Needed clearer separation between findings and statutory commands.

rev08a posture

  • More precise conduct and process definitions.
  • Explicit good-faith safety-reporting protection.
  • Written findings and review paths before rights-affecting action.
  • Phased implementation, fiscal capacity, public reporting, and severability.
Current initiative pagerev08a frameworkRed-team review
Public comment rules

Make comments useful without turning the site into private intake.

  • Do send: language concerns, implementation concerns, due-process concerns, safety-exception concerns, source-quality notes, and fiscal/capacity concerns.
  • Do not send: child names, sealed records, private allegations, addresses, medical information, confidential court filings, or emergency requests.
  • Use official doors: emergencies, DHHS/OCFS reports, court filings, protection orders, and legal representation must go through the proper channels.
  • Keep public review public: comments should improve text and policy design, not litigate private cases on the internet.
Safety first: If abuse, coercive control, stalking, sexual assault, or child-safety concerns are involved, use Crisis + Keep Safe before campaign or policy pages.
Review materials

One page, multiple reader routes

rev08a draft

Read the narrowed public-review framework.

Open rev08a

Risk notes

Read likely hostile-review points.

Open risks

Evidence notes

Check claims against source discipline.

Open evidence
Public packets + access

The site now has reader-specific packets, structured SEO data, and stronger keyboard/mobile affordances.

Use public packets for reporters, officials, family helpers, skeptical reviewers, and public meetings. This lane also adds author/canonical metadata, JSON-LD, skip links, focus states, reduced-motion support, mobile tap-target hardening, and print-safe styles.

Open public packetsPress packetOfficials packetSkeptics packet