Safety first If there is immediate danger, someone may be harmed, or you may not stay safe, call 911 now. For emotional crisis, call or text 988, or call the Maine Crisis Line at 1-888-568-1112. If abuse, coercive control, stalking, sexual assault, or child-safety concerns are involved, use the crisis page before forms, arguments, or public-record work. Safe-device reminder: if another person monitors this device, use a safer phone/computer, clear history only if safe, or call a live advocate.

No private case intake: do not send child names, sealed records, private allegations, or confidential files through public campaign links. Privacy boundarySafety first

Site boundary: JTforME is the campaign, public-record, citizen-initiative, and Maine family-help routing hub. For volunteer-only public education, printable tools, and research/source materials, use FOCaF.

Dashboard 2.0

A dashboard is only useful when its numbers can be checked.

Metric definitions, source-freshness notes, method limits, and future success measures for Maine family-matters reform.

This is public education and public-record organization, not legal advice, emergency help, or private case intake.

Dashboard method

Dashboard 2.0 is a source-and-method layer, not just more charts.

The dashboard should show what Maine families are up against while staying honest about what the public record proves, what it suggests, and what it cannot prove without better reporting.

Metric freshness

Every public number needs a source, date, method, and limitation.

Download: dashboard_2_0_metrics.csv · Machine-readable: dashboard-2-0-metrics.json

MetricLaneSourceFreshness targetLimitation
Pending family mattersCourt pressureMaine Judicial Branch annual reportAnnualShows pressure trend; does not identify fault in any case
Court capacity / workload needCourt capacityMaine workload assessmentWhen study updatesShows capacity gap; does not decide which reform fixes it
Regional family and eviction filingsRegional pressureRegional court caseload reportsAnnual/FYShows overlap of pressure; not a causation claim
Housing availability and strainFamily stabilityMaineHousing and related public reportsAnnual/periodicShows stability pressure; not a custody-specific conclusion
Official doors and formsAccess-to-helpMaine Judicial Branch, DHHS/OCFS, child support, legal aid, 211Monthly freshness check targetDoes not replace official forms or legal help
Success measuresReform accountabilityFuture public reporting/RFCTo be definedA target dashboard, not yet a complete public dataset
State pressure view

The dashboard should be readable by problem, not by bureaucracy.

Court pressure

Evidence

Annual reports and workload materials support the need for measurable court-process reform and better public reporting.

Family stability

Evidence

Housing, transportation, food, childcare, and school support are practical pressure layers that can destabilize family routines.

Access to help

Evidence

Official doors and legal-aid/self-help routes exist, but public routing can still be easier and more humane.

Accountability gaps

Evidence

Some metrics need new reporting: continuances, time-to-resolution, child-time disruption, GAL capacity, and practical completion rates.

Family stability layer

Dashboard 2.0 should connect court pressure to real-world family pressure without overclaiming causation.

Housing and transportation

Use housing and transportation data as stability context, not as proof that a particular family-court outcome was caused by housing instability.

School and provider continuity

Connect the dashboard to the school/provider lane so public policy can see how court pressure can show up in attendance, appointments, transitions, and child routines.

Economic strain

Child support, childcare, food, MaineCare/AccessMaine routing, and employment pressure belong near the dashboard because family stability is practical before it is political.

Success measures

The public dashboard should say what better looks like.

  1. Timely first stabilizing step: how quickly families receive orientation, safety routing, service information, and next-date clarity.
  2. Time to durable resolution: how long contested and uncontested matters take, separated by case type and region.
  3. Continuance transparency: why hearings move, how often they move, and which delays are avoidable.
  4. Child-time disruption: whether process delay itself is contributing to preventable loss of parent-child time.
  5. Practical support completion: whether families reach housing, child support, legal aid, counseling, school/provider, or DHHS/OCFS doors when those are the real problem.
Data gap note: some success measures may require public-record requests, agency cooperation, or legislative reporting requirements. This page identifies the measurement need without pretending every metric already exists.
Public packets + access

The site now has reader-specific packets, structured SEO data, and stronger keyboard/mobile affordances.

Use public packets for reporters, officials, family helpers, skeptical reviewers, and public meetings. This lane also adds author/canonical metadata, JSON-LD, skip links, focus states, reduced-motion support, mobile tap-target hardening, and print-safe styles.

Administration accountability

Sharper public pressure: receipts, metrics, safety routing, and correction loops.

The accountability page now frames administrative drift and institutional delay as measurable public failures without profanity, personal attacks, or unsupported motive claims.