Skip to main content
JTFORME

The trilogy is live

THE NO “MOORE” HARM SERIES

Carpooling to Hell — the record. IN RE: The Tyranny of Family Law — the indictment. Trial by Fire — the adversarial test.

The indictment · Book II

IN RE:
THE TYRANNY
OF FAMILY LAW

Read the indictment.

Formal. Research-grounded. Constitutional. Policy-driven.

This is why the machine produces foreseeable harm — and what the law should require instead. The argument moves from personal record to constitutional duty, operational failure, neutral investigation, child time, and enforceable remedies.

Book IIPolicy argumentConstitutional frameAmazon listing live

Amazon: Book II is live. This button opens the exact-title Amazon search for the listing.

Cover-style graphic for IN RE: The Tyranny of Family Law
Book II artwork. The Amazon listing is live.

Book II companion arcade · The Indictment

Read the indictment. Then build the case yourself.

Build sourced chains from Fact → Source → Standard → Harm → Remedy. Unsupported leaps strengthen the Presumption Engine. Accuracy breaks it.

THE INDICTMENTComplete the Book II arcade to earn this trilogy seal.
Responsible Decision Making satirical companion artwork with folders labeled delay, more fees, more hearings, more experts, more reports, more motions, and more harm.
Satirical companion artwork for the Book II argument: when process keeps asking families for more, responsible decision-making should require more accountability too.

A bit more responsibility

Responsible decision-making cannot mean more process and less accountability.

Book II is the formal version of the argument: public power must test facts promptly, protect child time, and stop mistaking additional process for justice. The satire is loud; the legal point is simple.

What this book does

The public argument after the personal record.

The charge

Delay, gatekeeping, and unreviewed adult narratives become foreseeable harm when public systems do not promptly test the facts.

The proof posture

The book rests on source navigation, court-process records, research, timelines, and operational analysis rather than outrage alone.

The remedy frame

No neutral review, no substantive order. Immediate investigation, findings, enforceable child-centered orders, and accountability for delay.