PUBLIC RECORD EXTRACT

Date sent: July 21, 2026, 6:13 PM EDT
Subject: FORMAL PRESERVATION NOTICE — 174 eFileMaine Rejection and Failure Messages, Publicly Financed System Failures, Delayed Deprivation of Parental Rights, and YORDC-FM-2010-00190
Sender: Justin Tahai
Direct institutional recipients: Tyler Technologies filing support; Maine eCourts help; Maine Judicial Branch; Office of the Maine Attorney General
Additional distribution: members of the 132nd Maine Legislature; Maine and national newsrooms; Board of Overseers recipients; counsel and parties

Purpose
The notice requested preservation of support tickets, logs, rejection records, routing history, configuration and change records, screenshots, internal communications, and other records relevant to eFileMaine performance and a publicly visible interface defect.

Documented count stated in the notice
The email reported 174 rejection or failure messages located in the sender’s Gmail archive. A later article notice broke that total into 71 “Rejected Filing Notification” messages, 101 “File & Serve Filing Rejected Notification” messages, and 2 “Notification of Failed Filing Submission” messages. Those are the sender’s documented archive counts, not official statewide Tyler or Judicial Branch statistics.

Representative envelopes identified
248993, 249772, and 249779.

Selected exact excerpts
“This correspondence constitutes formal preservation notice, legislative-accountability notice, vendor-performance notice, public notice, and notice of continuing functional deprivation of parental rights arising from the administration of Maine eCourts and eFileMaine...”

“This notice does not ask the Legislature to determine the merits of a private family dispute. It asks the State to confront the publicly financed administrative, technological, filing, record-access, docket-management, implementation, and leadership systems that determine whether parental and child-related rights can be exercised before time destroys their practical value.”

Record boundary
This is a public extract prepared from the original sent email. The reported message counts describe one sender’s preserved mailbox record. They do not establish that every notice reflected a unique defect, that every rejection was improper, or that any official body has found vendor misconduct.