FEBRUARY 11 ORDER DEFECTS — PUBLIC-SAFE SOURCE EXTRACT
Built August 16, 2026

1. THANKSGIVING FINDING IN THE ORDER
The February 11, 2026 Findings and Order states on page 6 that the child “transitioned to his father’s home on Thanksgiving Day.”

2. RULE 52(b) CORRECTION REQUEST
The father’s Rule 52(b) Motion to Amend Findings states that this sentence did not reflect the testimony presented at hearing. The motion states that the testimony, including Ms. Morse’s testimony, established:
- the child was with the father until approximately noon on Thanksgiving Eve;
- no Thanksgiving Day transition occurred as scheduled;
- the child remained with Ms. Morse until the following Monday; and
- Monday contact lasted only approximately two to three hours.

The motion requested that the order be amended. It also stated that the transcript/audio had been requested and would confirm the testimony. The motion is a filed correction request, not a transcript. The native hearing record controls.

3. TRANSCRIPT / AUDIO ACCESS
The January 16, 2026 consolidated hearing was identified as 326 minutes. On January 27, 2026:
- 10:29 AM — private-pay appeal transcript order confirmed;
- 10:42 AM — the issue was forwarded to transcript offices and opposing counsel;
- 10:44 AM — OTO stated the order remained private pay unless the trial court changed it;
- 12:36 PM — eScribers estimated 326 pages at $4.65 per page, requiring a $1,515.90 deposit before work began;
- 12:38 PM — the materials were forwarded to counsel contacts.

No minute-by-minute hearing timecodes are invented in this public extract. A usable native audio file or transcript is required for exact testimony timecodes.

4. PORTAL ACCESS SEQUENCE — JULY 27, 2026
- 9:33 AM — limited annual-physical notice received;
- 10:44 AM — request sent for time, location, attendance, direct listing, future notices, and after-visit summary;
- approximately 11:03 AM — time-stamped screenshot showed the hospital portal offering only verification choices ending in 7645 after prior mobile access no longer worked;
- 11:16 AM — preservation and audit request sent to the provider, with opposing counsel copied.

The screenshot proves the access condition visible at that time. It does not prove who changed any information, when a change occurred, or whether an adolescent-portal policy contributed. Audit logs are required.

5. FAIRNESS / DEFERENCE CONCERN
The after-order and appellate-preservation materials challenge the exclusion of former GAL Glenn Anderson’s testimony. Justin Tahai publicly characterizes that handling as undue deference to opposing counsel and professional hierarchy. That is a disclosed opinion based on the described record, not a judicial finding of bias, collusion, or misconduct.


6. WRONG-SURNAME AND ADDITIONAL RULE 52(b) ISSUES
The searchable order transcription uses “Ms. Moore” 19 times in the nineteen-page Findings and Order, although the party is Amanda Morse. The original signed scan controls, but the repeated mismatch is an objective document-quality issue.

The Rule 52(b) correction motion also challenged:
- the Monday retrieval characterization, stating the record did not establish that Ms. Morse attempted to speak with the father before retrieval; and
- the scope attributed to Daniel Pierce’s testimony, stating he testified to initial nervousness but not threatening, violent, or intimidating conduct in session or broader concern about tone or manner.

A supplemental Rule 52(b) motion separately requested findings on amended contempt allegations involving financial disclosures and child-support-affidavit compliance. The order denied contempt generally without separately addressing those allegations. Each point is a preserved correction or omitted-findings issue, not a final appellate determination. The native hearing record and official docket control.