{"meta":{"title":"Amanda Morse Order-Implementation Record - Full Public-Safe Master Timeline","generated":"2026-08-16T23:59:00-04:00","sourceDocument":"Master Timeline v22 - Available-Source Update Through August 15, 2026, With v21 Preserved","sourcePages":141,"entries":395,"publicSafety":"Minor name, birth date, private phone numbers, email addresses, residential addresses, direct quoted minor messages, and selected minor health details are omitted or redacted. Native sources remain controlling.","evidentiaryBoundary":"This is a source-navigation chronology. It distinguishes official records, direct communications, provider/school records, filings, procedural records, advocacy, and synthesis. It is not an adjudication of disputed facts or a finding of contempt.","yearCounts":{"2010":1,"2011":4,"2012":2,"2014":1,"2016":11,"2018":6,"2019":8,"2020":6,"2021":3,"2022":3,"2023":7,"2024":16,"2025":36,"2026":291},"tagCounts":{"appeal":103,"contact":109,"counsel":143,"court-order":102,"efiling":68,"financial":36,"general":45,"medical":72,"public-accountability":55,"records":59,"safety":50,"school":66,"therapy":90},"sourceTypeCounts":{"Direct communication":259,"Filing / party assertion":41,"Official court / docket record":21,"Procedural system record":11,"Provider / school record":5,"Public advocacy record":6,"Timeline synthesis / source navigation":52}},"entries":[{"id":"V22-001","sourcePage":3,"dateLabel":"July 29, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 29, 2026 - Amended and supplemental contempt attachment adds July 27-29 medicalaccess events","displayTitle":"July 29, 2026 - Amended and supplemental contempt attachment adds July 27-29 medicalaccess events","recordAnchor":"The August 3 second supplemental motion states that the July 19 FM-068 Motion for Contempt remained the operative official form and that an amended and supplemental Attachment A was served on July 29 to add the July 27-29 medical-access events.","whyItMatters":"This carries the July 27 annual-physical notice and portal-access issue into the existing contempt/enforcement lane without treating each later event as a new independent proceeding.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Consolidated_Rejected_Filings_YORDC-FM-2010-00190_Envelopes_257090_and_257100.pdf; procedural-posture section. Native July 29 service email and attachment control.","statusLimitations":"High for the content of the later sworn filing. Exact July 29 submission, service, and docket status require the native Gmail/Tyler records.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"V22-002","sourcePage":3,"dateLabel":"July 31, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 31, 2026 - Corrected relation-back materials reportedly served after two Tyler rejections","displayTitle":"July 31, 2026 - Corrected relation-back materials reportedly served after two Tyler rejections","recordAnchor":"The August 3 filing states that corrected relation-back materials were served on July 31 after two Tyler/eFileMaine rejection notices.","whyItMatters":"This preserves a correction-and-resubmission sequence between the v21 cutoff and the August 3 incident and helps distinguish substantive relief from portal-generated iterations.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Consolidated rejected-filings packet, paragraph 2 of the procedural posture. Native rejection and resubmission notices remain the controlling proof.","statusLimitations":"Medium-High. The project source preserves the later sworn summary, but the underlying July 31 emails/notices were not independently available in this session.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","medical","efiling"]},{"id":"V22-003","sourcePage":3,"dateLabel":"Before August 3, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Before August 3, 2026 - Disputed position that the father could not attend the annual physical under the PFA","displayTitle":"Before August 3, 2026 - Disputed position that the father could not attend the annual physical under the PFA","recordAnchor":"The verified supplemental attachment states that Ms. Morse wrote that the father [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] It states that he disputed the categorical interpretation, proposed noncontact and provider-controlled logistics, and requested the exact operative language supporting exclusion.","whyItMatters":"The dispute concerns adult-to-adult interpretation, healthcare participation, and safe logistics. It should be assessed against the complete email and operative orders rather than reduced to the child resolving the legal disagreement.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Second Supplemental Attachment A within the consolidated rejected-filings packet, section II.","statusLimitations":"High for what the sworn filing asserts; the native email and full orders control. This entry does not decide whether attendance was legally permitted or prohibited.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","school","medical","safety"]},{"id":"V22-004","sourcePage":3,"dateLabel":"August 3, 2026, approximately 10:24 a.m.","year":2026,"title":"August 3, 2026, approximately 10:24 a.m. - Minor child calls from the medical office and asks father to leave","displayTitle":"August 3, 2026, approximately 10:24 a.m. - Minor child calls from the medical office and asks father to leave","recordAnchor":"The verified filing states that, while the father was present for the scheduled 10:30 a.m. annual physical, the minor child called and said he was [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] the father was not supposed to be there and told him to leave. The father did not enter the examination room or create a confrontation and remained in the waiting area while Ms. Morse entered with the child.","whyItMatters":"The event is relevant to whether the child was placed in the role of messenger, legal interpreter, or enforcer of a disputed adult restriction. It also documents the father's nonconfrontational response.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Second Supplemental Motion for Leave and Second Supplemental Attachment A; consolidated rejected-filings packet.","statusLimitations":"High for the verified party account and timing preserved in the filing. The child's statement does not identify who supplied the belief, the words used, or any person's motive.","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["medical","court-order"]},{"id":"V22-005","sourcePage":4,"dateLabel":"August 3, 2026, 10:30:20 a.m.","year":2026,"title":"August 3, 2026, 10:30:20 a.m. - Contemporaneous Gmail notice to Ms. Morse and Attorney Bedard","displayTitle":"August 3, 2026, 10:30:20 a.m. - Contemporaneous Gmail notice to Ms. Morse and Attorney Bedard","recordAnchor":"Gmail Message ID 19fc808625df0145 was sent from Justin Tahai to Patrick S. Bedard and Amanda Morse, with Daniel Pierce, LCSW copied. Subject: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] The email recorded the 10:24 call, asked what had been communicated to the child and by whom, requested the specific order language supposedly prohibiting the father's presence, and stated that adult disagreements should be handled through adult and professional channels.","whyItMatters":"This is a same-minute preservation anchor that requests clarification rather than treating the source of the child's belief as already proven.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Exhibit AUG3-1 in the consolidated rejected-filings packet; Gmail Message ID 19fc808625df0145.","statusLimitations":"High for sender, recipients, timestamp, subject, and transmitted text. The email proves the content and timing of the notice, not the truth of every inference within it.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"V22-006","sourcePage":4,"dateLabel":"August 3, 2026, 10:52:34 a.m.","year":2026,"title":"August 3, 2026, 10:52:34 a.m. - Provider and records-access notice sent to York Hospital channels","displayTitle":"August 3, 2026, 10:52:34 a.m. - Provider and records-access notice sent to York Hospital channels","recordAnchor":"Gmail Message ID 19fc81cc1aae4cb9 was sent from Justin Tahai to York Hospital, Daniel Pierce, LCSW, and York Hospital Medical Records, with Amanda Morse copied. Subject: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] The message asked that it be forwarded to Dr. Michael Vinograd and Pediatric Associates in Wells and preserved the appointment, participation, portal-access, and clinical-context issues.","whyItMatters":"This creates a direct provider-notice and records-preservation anchor and carries forward the July 27 Healow/eClinicalWorks access issue.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Exhibit AUG3-2 in the consolidated rejected-filings packet; Gmail Message ID 19fc81cc1aae4cb9.","statusLimitations":"High for transmission metadata and the text visible in the exhibit. Provider receipt, chart incorporation, audit action, and response remain separate questions.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","medical"]},{"id":"V22-007","sourcePage":4,"dateLabel":"August 3-4, 2026","year":2026,"title":"August 3-4, 2026 - Ms. Morse response preserved as an exhibit; exact text remains a nativethread item","displayTitle":"August 3-4, 2026 - Ms. Morse response preserved as an exhibit; exact text remains a nativethread item","recordAnchor":"The enforcement packet includes a two-page Exhibit A labeled [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] The project extraction available to this session did not expose the exact message body.","whyItMatters":"Adverse/completeness evidence should be carried forward, but the timeline should not paraphrase text it cannot directly review. The exhibit and native Gmail thread must be read in full before quoting or characterizing the response.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Exhibit A within envelope 257100 components; native Gmail thread not available in this session.","statusLimitations":"Existence and exhibit label are confirmed. Exact language, context, and implications remain open pending native-message review.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"V22-008","sourcePage":4,"dateLabel":"August 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m. and 9:19 p.m. EDT","year":2026,"title":"August 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m. and 9:19 p.m. EDT - Two related eFileMaine envelopes submitted","displayTitle":"August 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m. and 9:19 p.m. EDT - Two related eFileMaine envelopes submitted","recordAnchor":"Envelope 257090 was submitted at 7:32 p.m. with five separately identified components: second supplemental motion for leave, memorandum of law, second supplemental Attachment A, proposed order, and exhibits AUG3-1 through AUG3-3. Envelope 257100 was submitted at 9:19 p.m. with four components: verified Attachment A to FM-070 Motion to Enforce, supporting memorandum, proposed order, and Exhibit A.","whyItMatters":"The record should treat these as two related filing events composed of nine PDFs, not as nine independent new disputes or nine separate motions.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Consolidated rejected-filings cover/index and original component PDFs.","statusLimitations":"High for envelope numbers, submission times, filenames, and component count. Submission does not establish clerk entry, judicial presentment, or merits action.","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"V22-009","sourcePage":4,"dateLabel":"August 6, 2026, 10:14 a.m.","year":2026,"title":"August 6, 2026, 10:14 a.m. - Envelope 257090 rejected with fifteen automated notices in approximately thirteen seconds","displayTitle":"August 6, 2026, 10:14 a.m. - Envelope 257090 rejected with fifteen automated notices in approximately thirteen seconds","recordAnchor":"The FM-218 rejection-record attachment states that envelope 257090 generated five primary Rejected Filing Notification messages and ten duplicative File & Serve Filing Rejected Notification messages within approximately thirteen seconds.","whyItMatters":"This is a concrete example of notification churn. Primary rejection decisions, duplicate return/service notices, filing components, and substantive filing events must be counted separately.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"FM218_Supplemental_Attachment_Rejection_Record_2026-08-06.pdf, executive summary; consolidated rejected-filings index.","statusLimitations":"High for the party-compiled notice count as preserved in the filing. Native Gmail search/export should be used to independently reproduce the count.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"V22-010","sourcePage":5,"dateLabel":"August 6, 2026, 10:31 a.m.","year":2026,"title":"August 6, 2026, 10:31 a.m. - Envelope 257100 rejected; four substantive primary notices plus duplicate system notices","displayTitle":"August 6, 2026, 10:31 a.m. - Envelope 257100 rejected; four substantive primary notices plus duplicate system notices","recordAnchor":"The consolidated packet states that the 10:31 a.m. sequence generated four substantive primary rejection notices for the four component PDFs and additional duplicate File & Serve notifications.","whyItMatters":"This confirms that one envelope can generate multiple automated messages and component-level notices, making raw email totals an unreliable proxy for independent filing events.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Consolidated rejected-filings cover/index, envelope 257100 record note.","statusLimitations":"High for the four primary components and existence of duplicates. The exact duplicate-message count requires native Gmail review.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"V22-011","sourcePage":5,"dateLabel":"August 6, 2026","year":2026,"title":"August 6, 2026 - FM-218 supplemental rejection record prepared to seek judicial direction","displayTitle":"August 6, 2026 - FM-218 supplemental rejection record prepared to seek judicial direction","recordAnchor":"A ten-page supplemental attachment to FM-218 documented repeated rejections, changing or incompatible corrective instructions, the wrong-subdivision concern in Rule 35 boilerplate, the repeated [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] instruction, proposed-order placement issues, and the request to permit a conventional paper submission and transmit the expedited request to a judicial officer.","whyItMatters":"The filing translates portal frustration into a source-indexed procedural record and asks that the clerk and court distinguish ministerial rejection mechanics from the merits of child-impact relief.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"FM218_Supplemental_Attachment_Rejection_Record_2026-08-06.pdf; project analysis titled [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] for the categorized instruction conflicts.","statusLimitations":"High for the content of the party submission. The identified contradictions are party analysis, not judicial findings; current MRECS text, clerk notices, and any later order control.","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["medical","efiling"]},{"id":"V22-012","sourcePage":5,"dateLabel":"August 15, 2026","year":2026,"title":"August 15, 2026 - Available project review reaches current date, but the live Gmail completion lane remains open","displayTitle":"August 15, 2026 - Available project review reaches current date, but the live Gmail completion lane remains open","recordAnchor":"The current project contains public-facing Business Suite/Facebook messages, campaign-story viewer screenshots, and analytics through August 15, but no live Gmail connector or complete native-mail export was available for this session. Those social items are preserved outside the principal Gmail/court chronology.","whyItMatters":"This prevents social-platform activity from being mistaken for Gmail evidence, court service, or proof of coordination. It also identifies the exact completeness boundary rather than implying that no additional August emails exist.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Project screenshots dated August 15-16, 2026; current-session tool availability; v21 source rule.","statusLimitations":"High for the existence of the screenshots and the tool limitation. No inference is made about identity, coordination, motive, or legal significance from profile aesthetics, names, or story views alone.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy"]},{"id":"V21-001","sourcePage":10,"dateLabel":"July 15, 2026, 12:49 p.m. ET","year":2026,"title":"July 15, 2026, 12:49 p.m. ET - Clerk asks not to be copied and confirms ordinary-course processing","displayTitle":"July 15, 2026, 12:49 p.m. ET - Clerk asks not to be copied and confirms ordinary-course processing","recordAnchor":"York Judicial Center Clerk/Manager Julie Howard replied to the July 14 service email: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] stated she did not want an expectation that action was being taken because of the emails, and said the motion would be processed in the ordinary course of business.","whyItMatters":"This is a direct procedural-routing anchor. It distinguishes administrative awareness from filing, docket entry, judicial presentment, or merits action.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19f65d3bd64d0dfe; thread 19f63024593416d7.","statusLimitations":"Court routing / clerk procedure","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"V21-002","sourcePage":10,"dateLabel":"July 15, 2026, afternoon and evening","year":2026,"title":"July 15, 2026, afternoon and evening - Revised timeline, formal objection, CJC packet, and audio/eCourts notice distributed","displayTitle":"July 15, 2026, afternoon and evening - Revised timeline, formal objection, CJC packet, and audio/eCourts notice distributed","recordAnchor":"Emails sent a revised master timeline and compliance request, a public-accountability notice concerning rejected filings and retained fees, a follow-up with the original CJC packet, and a Rule 5/public notice attaching the May [private address redacted] order and court-audio request materials.","whyItMatters":"The sequence preserves notice of filing barriers, record fragmentation, scheduling demands, transcript/audio access, and the distinction between public notice and court action.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19f6623a245d4a9e, 19f669a529d1c0e0, 19f66ad2763e44d0, 19f67b2dbda179ff; attachment metadata preserved in Gmail.","statusLimitations":"Public accountability / court access / audio record","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","public-accountability","financial"]},{"id":"V21-003","sourcePage":10,"dateLabel":"July 16, 2026, 1:18 p.m. ET","year":2026,"title":"July 16, 2026, 1:18 p.m. ET - Implementation update reports continued nonresponse","displayTitle":"July 16, 2026, 1:18 p.m. ET - Implementation update reports continued nonresponse","recordAnchor":"Father advised Bedard and Morse that recent materials had been incorporated into the legal corpus, reported updated page and record counts, and stated that no substantive response had been received concerning identified implementation issues.","whyItMatters":"This is a contemporaneous nonresponse/status assertion and corpus-control anchor. The corpus counts are party-generated processing metrics, not court findings.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19f6b13c460194a4; subject [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","statusLimitations":"Implementation / source preservation","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"V21-004","sourcePage":10,"dateLabel":"July 16, 2026, 4:27-4:30 p.m. ET","year":2026,"title":"July 16, 2026, 4:27-4:30 p.m. ET - Production proposal and rejected-filing materials served","displayTitle":"July 16, 2026, 4:27-4:30 p.m. ET - Production proposal and rejected-filing materials served","recordAnchor":"A proposed request-for-production exhibit and related material were served, followed by a forwarded Tyler rejection notice and supporting exhibits concerning docket status and refund issues.","whyItMatters":"The sequence preserves both proposed discovery/production material and the electronic-filing rejection path. Filing-service metadata does not establish merits or enforceability.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19f6bc0dd147187f and 19f6bc3c54e2cc06.","statusLimitations":"Discovery preservation / eFile rejection","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"V21-005","sourcePage":10,"dateLabel":"July 17-18, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 17-18, 2026 - Public implementation notice, enforcement service, and professional-conduct complaints","displayTitle":"July 17-18, 2026 - Public implementation notice, enforcement service, and professional-conduct complaints","recordAnchor":"The record includes a broad public notice concerning continued failure to implement in-person contact; service of motion-to-enforce materials; forwarding of rejected-filing materials; and professional-conduct complaints or grievance submissions involving counsel and the prosecutor lane.","whyItMatters":"This groups related notice and oversight events while avoiding the false impression that each email equals a separate merits request.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19f70a415e554933, 19f71a2fead6a5fa, 19f75b8c60aa2aea, 19f75d0eb132b8c8, 19f75f09fd5f13d8, 19f7611fe29b2a0b; native attachments control.","statusLimitations":"Enforcement / oversight / filing access","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","court-order","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V21-006","sourcePage":11,"dateLabel":"July 19, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 19, 2026 - Modification, contempt, immediate-implementation, and public-notice materials sent","displayTitle":"July 19, 2026 - Modification, contempt, immediate-implementation, and public-notice materials sent","recordAnchor":"Father served a post-appeal modification packet, an updated contempt packet, an immediateimplementation demand, and a public-accountability notice addressing continuing child and family harm. A later forward placed the immediate-implementation email before Bedard.","whyItMatters":"The date contains multiple distinct packets but a common implementation theme. The chronology preserves them as separate transmissions without treating allegations as findings.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19f7a52687ff6743, 19f7a11858387712, 19f7a8d7713c2ca3, 19f7ada96837f018, 19f7b0728e3ce70d, 19f7b3a2e4e99bea, 19f7cc20b6b5d0dd.","statusLimitations":"Modification / contempt / implementation / public notice","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V21-007","sourcePage":11,"dateLabel":"July 20, 2026, 7:37-9:01 p.m. ET","year":2026,"title":"July 20, 2026, 7:37-9:01 p.m. ET - Direct court letter and child-welfare referral notice distributed","displayTitle":"July 20, 2026, 7:37-9:01 p.m. ET - Direct court letter and child-welfare referral notice distributed","recordAnchor":"A direct letter concerning continuing harm and institutional delay was served on Bedard and Morse with media/oversight recipients copied. A later notice characterized the matter as a child-welfare referral and requested a neutral investigation.","whyItMatters":"This preserves the exact distribution lanes and the attached letter. The referral request is advocacy and does not establish that an agency opened or completed an investigation.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19f8108ada197e45 and 19f81550253c5bf4; attachment Direct_Letter_to_the_Court_Help_My_Son_2026-07-20.pdf.","statusLimitations":"Court notice / child-welfare referral / public accountability","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V21-008","sourcePage":11,"dateLabel":"July 21, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 21, 2026 - Tyler rejection materials, public-view milestones, and preservation notice sent","displayTitle":"July 21, 2026 - Tyler rejection materials, public-view milestones, and preservation notice sent","recordAnchor":"Rejected-filing notices were forwarded with upload maps/read-me instructions. Separate emails documented public-content view milestones of approximately 8,000 and 24,300 views. A formal preservation notice concerning a large set of eFileMaine rejection/failure messages was also distributed.","whyItMatters":"This date preserves both court-access evidence and public-reach metadata. View counts are platform metrics and do not establish agreement with the content.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19f849072eb311a8, 19f85016e9570806, 19f84b579eaa7263, 19f84d92dbe4eb42, 19f86bd81c4fd0eb, 19f877bfd014e3bb.","statusLimitations":"eFile failures / public reach / preservation","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"V21-009","sourcePage":11,"dateLabel":"July 21-22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 21-22, 2026 - Transcript/audio and expedited-motion filings entered in Odyssey","displayTitle":"July 21-22, 2026 - Transcript/audio and expedited-motion filings entered in Odyssey","recordAnchor":"Tyler confirmed that envelope 250354, submitted July 21 at 5:33 p.m., was entered July 22 as an Appeal - Transcript Request & Order Form. Tyler also confirmed envelope 250363 was entered July 22 as Motion for Expedited Hearing and Other Motion filings.","whyItMatters":"These are official clerk-entry anchors, not merely submissions. The entries preserve a successful docketing path after prior rejection cycles.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Tyler/Gmail messages 19f8b4a99b8cd477, 19f8b568b814e370, 19f8b568ff3cc24d.","statusLimitations":"Tyler/Odyssey entry / transcript and expedition","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["court-order","appeal","efiling"]},{"id":"V21-010","sourcePage":11,"dateLabel":"July 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 22, 2026 - Clinical-session invitation and article notice sent","displayTitle":"July 22, 2026 - Clinical-session invitation and article notice sent","recordAnchor":"Father forwarded the July 24 Daniel Pierce appointment reminder, invited Ms. Morse to participate in a clinically supervised conversation, and offered to wait outside or remain out of the session as the provider considered appropriate. A separate public-accountability article notice was sent later that day.","whyItMatters":"The invitation is a concrete adult-facilitation proposal. Whether participation was clinically appropriate remained for the provider, and the later email exchange must be read in full.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19f8a68f2047f9e1 and 19f8aae383f42e7c; appointment.ics metadata preserved.","statusLimitations":"Therapy/contact logistics / public notice","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","medical","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V21-011","sourcePage":11,"dateLabel":"July 23, 2026, 2:00 p.m. ET","year":2026,"title":"July 23, 2026, 2:00 p.m. ET - [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] notice distributed","displayTitle":"July 23, 2026, 2:00 p.m. ET - [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] notice distributed","recordAnchor":"A broad email with a photograph stated that lost birthdays, holidays, school years, conversations, trust, and childhood time could not later be restored, and distinguished accountability from disputes about tone.","whyItMatters":"This is a public-accountability and notice anchor. The language is advocacy; the attached photograph and transmission metadata remain the direct source.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19f8f46e61a7351f; inline image 4389.jpg.","statusLimitations":"Child-development time / public accountability","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V21-012","sourcePage":12,"dateLabel":"July 24, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 24, 2026 - Therapy-session exchange and refusal to attend preserved","displayTitle":"July 24, 2026 - Therapy-session exchange and refusal to attend preserved","recordAnchor":"Ms. Morse replied that she spoke with Dan periodically by telephone and saw no reason to meet with him. Father responded after the session ended that the proposal had been for direct clinical observation and facilitated discussion, not merely a telephone call, and asked whether she would participate in a future clinically appropriate session. Ms. Morse later replied again in the thread.","whyItMatters":"This is a direct adult-coordination and provider-observation anchor. It should be read as a complete thread, including each party's statements, rather than as a one-sided summary.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19f94c81ca0e9fb3, 19f94da28206c1fc, 19f95877b282ddcd, 19f95bf7e358e823; thread 19f8a64d9402654d.","statusLimitations":"Therapy / neutral observation / adult logistics","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","medical"]},{"id":"V21-013","sourcePage":12,"dateLabel":"July 24, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 24, 2026 - Morse response to [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] and expanded public-accountability distribution","displayTitle":"July 24, 2026 - Morse response to [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] and expanded public-accountability distribution","recordAnchor":"Ms. Morse responded to the [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] message. The same day, Father distributed additional public-accountability materials, including an [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] article, a direct-assessment packet, and an open letter concerning Board-accountability review.","whyItMatters":"The Morse response is preserved as adverse/completeness evidence. The mass-distribution emails are separate public-advocacy events and do not establish recipient endorsement.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19f94c3815fd64e5, 19f95e5dea70282e, 19f967f87e727250, 19f969aeac9d2fce.","statusLimitations":"Adverse record / public accountability / Board review","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["public-accountability"]},{"id":"V21-014","sourcePage":12,"dateLabel":"July 25, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 25, 2026 - Board-accountability follow-up and immediate-status motion distributed","displayTitle":"July 25, 2026 - Board-accountability follow-up and immediate-status motion distributed","recordAnchor":"The open-letter thread was supplemented with a motion addressing immediate status, implementation, and cross-division processing disparity. The submission was distributed to executive, judicial, oversight, legislative, and media recipients.","whyItMatters":"This preserves the packet and distribution chain. The motion is advocacy; judicial effect depends on eFile acceptance and later docket treatment.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19f9a6b661360487; attachment Motion_Immediate_Status_Implementation_Cross_Division_Disparity_20260725_FINAL_NOT_ANGRY.pdf.","statusLimitations":"Board accountability / immediate scheduling / cross-division disparity","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","efiling","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V21-015","sourcePage":12,"dateLabel":"July 25-26, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 25-26, 2026 - Envelope 252039 submitted, served, then rejected","displayTitle":"July 25-26, 2026 - Envelope 252039 submitted, served, then rejected","recordAnchor":"Tyler records show envelope 252039 was submitted July 25 at approximately 2:01 p.m. ET and generated service. On July 26 at approximately 6:48 p.m. ET, it was rejected because a proposed order was not included when required under M.R. Civ. P. 7. The notice supplied four-business-day relation-back instructions under M.R.E.C.S. 35(E).","whyItMatters":"This is a discrete rejection event. Multiple Tyler emails are duplicate system notifications for the same envelope and should not be counted as separate rejected filings.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Tyler/Gmail messages 19f9a713a8260ad4, 19f9a713ded6b308, 19f9a713e963eb1e, 19fa09d873cae9d3, 19fa09d88ec03e63, 19fa09d8a60a0e9c.","statusLimitations":"Tyler rejection / relation back","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"V21-016","sourcePage":12,"dateLabel":"July 26, 2026, approximately 7:18 p.m. ET","year":2026,"title":"July 26, 2026, approximately 7:18 p.m. ET - Prompt relation-back resubmission as envelope 252093","displayTitle":"July 26, 2026, approximately 7:18 p.m. ET - Prompt relation-back resubmission as envelope 252093","recordAnchor":"Father resubmitted the filing with a proposed order and relation-back materials. Tyler generated submission and service notices for envelope 252093, and Father separately emailed Bedard and Morse a service copy with the proposed order and supplemental public-accountability documentation.","whyItMatters":"This shows prompt correction within the relation-back window. Submission and service do not yet establish clerk entry or judicial disposition.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Tyler/Gmail messages 19fa0ba09ecddcc6, 19fa0ba0acafbeff, 19fa0ba0cb4ebcc1, 19fa0ba0dc9b53cb, 19fa0ba15dd221df, 19fa0ba1692f364b, 19fa0ba1f37a9111, 19fa0ba1f9db59a7; service email 19fa0b7f8e91249f.","statusLimitations":"Tyler resubmission / Rule 5 notice","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"V21-017","sourcePage":13,"dateLabel":"July 26, 2026","year":2026,"title":"July 26, 2026 - Public-servants article and continued-delay notice sent","displayTitle":"July 26, 2026 - Public-servants article and continued-delay notice sent","recordAnchor":"A broad public email distributed the article [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] A separate email to Bedard and Morse addressed continued delay and attached an HTML article titled [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","whyItMatters":"These are public-accountability and notice events. They should remain analytically separate from court filings and direct child-logistics emails.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19f9f9234d146006 and 19fa09e906063740.","statusLimitations":"Public accountability / institutional delay","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V21-018","sourcePage":13,"dateLabel":"July 27, 2026, 9:33 a.m. ET","year":2026,"title":"July 27, 2026, 9:33 a.m. ET - Limited annual-physical notice received from Ms. Morse","displayTitle":"July 27, 2026, 9:33 a.m. ET - Limited annual-physical notice received from Ms. Morse","recordAnchor":"Ms. Morse emailed: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] The notice did not include the appointment time, office location, attendance arrangements, or direct-record access information.","whyItMatters":"This is a current healthcare-notice anchor and must be read with the later same-day request for details. It does not establish why the appointment was scheduled on that date or whether a prior appointment was missed.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19fa3c7da01c8a67; subject [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","statusLimitations":"Medical notice / appointment access","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","records"]},{"id":"V21-019","sourcePage":13,"dateLabel":"July 27, 2026, 10:44 a.m. ET","year":2026,"title":"July 27, 2026, 10:44 a.m. ET - Father requests time, location, attendance, and direct provider access","displayTitle":"July 27, 2026, 10:44 a.m. ET - Father requests time, location, attendance, and direct provider access","recordAnchor":"Father thanked Ms. Morse for the notice and requested the appointment time, office location, confirmation that he could attend, direct listing with the provider for future notices and records, and the after-visit summary.","whyItMatters":"This is a restrained, specific response that creates a clear request-and-response record without assuming the reason for the limited initial notice.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19fa408f5818a606; thread 19fa3c7da01c8a67.","statusLimitations":"Medical appointment logistics / records access","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","school","medical","records"]},{"id":"V21-020","sourcePage":13,"dateLabel":"July 27, 2026, approximately 11:03 a.m. ET","year":2026,"title":"July 27, 2026, approximately 11:03 a.m. ET - York Hospital portal displays only verification numbers ending in 7645","displayTitle":"July 27, 2026, approximately 11:03 a.m. ET - York Hospital portal displays only verification numbers ending in 7645","recordAnchor":"After the Healow mobile application no longer permitted prior access, Father attempted the desktop York Hospital Practice Portal. The portal displayed two verification choices ending in 7645. Father states that neither is his number and that his contact information has not changed in more than a decade. The preserved Windows screenshot shows July 27, 2026 at 11:03 a.m.","whyItMatters":"The screenshot proves the access condition visible at that time. It does not, by itself, prove who changed the account, when the change occurred, or whether a system-wide adolescent-portal policy contributed.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Image ecwWithClockShown.png; companion screenshot [companion portal-login screenshot]; native image metadata preserved.","statusLimitations":"Medical portal / demographic and proxy access","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["contact","medical"]},{"id":"V21-021","sourcePage":14,"dateLabel":"July 27, 2026, 11:16 a.m. ET","year":2026,"title":"July 27, 2026, 11:16 a.m. ET - York Hospital preservation and audit request sent with Bedard copied","displayTitle":"July 27, 2026, 11:16 a.m. ET - York Hospital preservation and audit request sent with Bedard copied","recordAnchor":"Father emailed York Hospital Medical Records, copied the general hospital address and Bedard, and requested immediate preservation and review of demographic changes, eClinicalWorks/Healow proxy access, appointment notices, audit metadata, the August 3 physical, the 2025 provider communication, and any basis for limiting parental access. The time-stamped portal screenshot and July 21, 2025 email PDF were attached.","whyItMatters":"This is the controlling provider-preservation anchor. It asks for audit evidence rather than treating responsibility as established and creates contemporaneous notice to opposing counsel without characterizing the CC as Rule 5 service.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19fa425e7f964d52; attachments ecwWithClockShown.png and 2025-07- 21_Email_to_Bedard_Doctors_Office_Contact.pdf.","statusLimitations":"Provider preservation / audit trail / medical access","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","medical","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-001","sourcePage":31,"dateLabel":"Oct. 2010","year":2010,"title":"Oct. 2010 - Initial family-court filing after withholding of child access.","displayTitle":"Oct. 2010 - Initial family-court filing after withholding of child access.","recordAnchor":"Marks the start of a long-running deprivation lane rather than a recent dispute. Compiled chronology / user anchor","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Contextual / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-002","sourcePage":31,"dateLabel":"2011-2012","year":2011,"title":"2011-2012 - First GAL investigation documented disparaging / undermining conduct and access-control concerns.","displayTitle":"2011-2012 - First GAL investigation documented disparaging / undermining conduct and access-control concerns.","recordAnchor":"Shows a neutral court-appointed lane was already seeing a pattern rather than isolated disagreements. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-003","sourcePage":31,"dateLabel":"Jan. 10, 2011","year":2011,"title":"Jan. 10, 2011 - Interim / stipulated order recognized shared parental rights and direct access to medical, dental, and school records.","displayTitle":"Jan. 10, 2011 - Interim / stipulated order recognized shared parental rights and direct access to medical, dental, and school records.","recordAnchor":"Later gatekeeping over basic child information cannot fairly be framed as confusion; the baseline was established early. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Provider / school record","tags":["school","medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-004","sourcePage":31,"dateLabel":"June 21, 2011","year":2011,"title":"June 21, 2011 - Driveway incident involving Ms.","displayTitle":"June 21, 2011 - Driveway incident involving Ms.","recordAnchor":"Morse reported to GAL Anderson. Supports Father's position that substance-related instability and safety concerns were raised early, not newly invented later. Compiled chronology / user anchor","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Contextual / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["safety"]},{"id":"Event-005","sourcePage":32,"dateLabel":"Nov. 28, 2011","year":2011,"title":"Nov. 28, 2011 - Witness subpoena hearing marker.","displayTitle":"Nov. 28, 2011 - Witness subpoena hearing marker.","recordAnchor":"The case had already moved into formal evidentiary conflict. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-006","sourcePage":32,"dateLabel":"Jan. 23, 2012","year":2012,"title":"Jan. 23, 2012 - Existing parental-rights and records-access framework remained in place.","displayTitle":"Jan. 23, 2012 - Existing parental-rights and records-access framework remained in place.","recordAnchor":"The legal structure for direct parental access existed long before the present deadlock. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-007","sourcePage":32,"dateLabel":"Feb. 7, 2012","year":2012,"title":"Feb. 7, 2012 - DHHS federal income withholding order / payor notice.","displayTitle":"Feb. 7, 2012 - DHHS federal income withholding order / payor notice.","recordAnchor":"Adds an early child-support enforcement anchor and shows state financial-control action long before the present disputes. Archived source review / second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS; Federal / institutional preservation; Financial / fee waiver / support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["medical","court-order","safety","financial"]},{"id":"Event-008","sourcePage":32,"dateLabel":"Mar. 10, 2014","year":2014,"title":"Mar. 10, 2014 - Child-support worksheet baseline.","displayTitle":"Mar. 10, 2014 - Child-support worksheet baseline.","recordAnchor":"Support mechanics were being formalized while broader co-parenting dysfunction remained unresolved. Google Drive chronology Medium Divorce judgment / PRR framework preserved records and information language. Later information obstruction ran against language already embedded in the operative family-court structure. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-009","sourcePage":32,"dateLabel":"Feb. 10-11, 2016","year":2016,"title":"Feb. 10-11, 2016 - Email and contempt-motion lane reflected denial of records and refusal to sign waiver / release material relating to child's care.","displayTitle":"Feb. 10-11, 2016 - Email and contempt-motion lane reflected denial of records and refusal to sign waiver / release material relating to child's care.","recordAnchor":"By 2016, access obstruction had already escalated into formal contempt litigation. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","court-order"]},{"id":"Event-010","sourcePage":33,"dateLabel":"Feb. 10-11, 2016","year":2016,"title":"Feb. 10-11, 2016 - Handwritten notes from the 2016 contempt period reflect active concerns regarding HIPAA / medical-information denial, neglect, parental-rights interference, and access obstruction.","displayTitle":"Feb. 10-11, 2016 - Handwritten notes from the 2016 contempt period reflect active concerns regarding HIPAA / medical-information denial, neglect, parental-rights interference, and access obstruction.","recordAnchor":"Contemporaneous records show Father raising access, neglect, and household-safety concerns in 2016, yet the court did not impose relief that meaningfully stopped the longer pattern. Uploaded handwritten notes / 2016 contempt notes","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["medical","court-order","safety"]},{"id":"Event-011","sourcePage":33,"dateLabel":"Feb. 16, 2016","year":2016,"title":"Feb. 16, 2016 - Court had to address the insurance / records-access fight through subpoena / hearing procedure.","displayTitle":"Feb. 16, 2016 - Court had to address the insurance / records-access fight through subpoena / hearing procedure.","recordAnchor":"The barrier was concrete enough to require court process; it was not vague complaining. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-012","sourcePage":33,"dateLabel":"Mar. 2, 2016","year":2016,"title":"Mar. 2, 2016 - Scheduling / subpoena / contempt-hearing lane proceeded on the records-access issue.","displayTitle":"Mar. 2, 2016 - Scheduling / subpoena / contempt-hearing lane proceeded on the records-access issue.","recordAnchor":"Shows the information-access barrier was concrete enough to require formal court process, not vague complaint. 2016 contempt filings","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"Event-013","sourcePage":33,"dateLabel":"Mar. 14, 2016","year":2016,"title":"Mar. 14, 2016 - Father pulled criminal-record materials relating to John Ramirez; related handwritten notes appear to come from around the same period.","displayTitle":"Mar. 14, 2016 - Father pulled criminal-record materials relating to John Ramirez; related handwritten notes appear to come from around the same period.","recordAnchor":"Shows Father was investigating adult-household and safety context during the same 2016 period, years before later household-concern lanes. Criminal-record pull / related handwritten notes","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High for date; Medium-High for full grouping / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["safety"]},{"id":"Event-014","sourcePage":33,"dateLabel":"On or about Mar. 14, 2016","year":2016,"title":"On or about Mar. 14, 2016 - Before a court appearance, Father personally overheard Ms.","displayTitle":"On or about Mar. 14, 2016 - Before a court appearance, Father personally overheard Ms.","recordAnchor":"Morse discussing with Attorney Bedard John Ramirez's date of birth / birthday timing and Ramirez's complaint that his former partner would not let him take the two sons they shared whenever he wanted. Supports Father's position that adult-household child-access issues, inconsistent standards regarding parent-child contact, and gatekeeping dynamics were already visible during the 2016 contempt period. Father observation / 2016 contempt-context note","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Parent-child contact implementation; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High for observation; Medium for exact venue / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["contact","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-015","sourcePage":33,"dateLabel":"Apr. 8, 2016","year":2016,"title":"Apr. 8, 2016 - Contempt hearing date on the medical-record / release / access issues.","displayTitle":"Apr. 8, 2016 - Contempt hearing date on the medical-record / release / access issues.","recordAnchor":"Confirms that the access-barrier lane reached formal hearing level, yet the longer pattern remained unresolved afterward. 2016 contempt hearing lane","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["medical","records","court-order","safety"]},{"id":"Event-016","sourcePage":34,"dateLabel":"May 3, 2016","year":2016,"title":"May 3, 2016 - Citizens Bank / Popmoney record reflects USD 2,000 sent to Amanda Morse.","displayTitle":"May 3, 2016 - Citizens Bank / Popmoney record reflects USD 2,000 sent to Amanda Morse.","recordAnchor":"Contemporaneous payment evidence existed, supporting Father's position that documentary proof did not produce meaningful corrective action. OneDrive bank records","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["financial"]},{"id":"Event-017","sourcePage":34,"dateLabel":"May 4, 2016","year":2016,"title":"May 4, 2016 - Same transfer record reflects withdrawal.","displayTitle":"May 4, 2016 - Same transfer record reflects withdrawal.","recordAnchor":"Shows immediate receipt / use of the transferred funds. OneDrive bank records","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Public advocacy record","tags":["public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-018","sourcePage":34,"dateLabel":"May 6, 2016","year":2016,"title":"May 6, 2016 - Same transfer record reflects projected availability / completion.","displayTitle":"May 6, 2016 - Same transfer record reflects projected availability / completion.","recordAnchor":"Completes the transfer timeline across three dated bank entries. OneDrive bank records","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-019","sourcePage":34,"dateLabel":"May 31, 2016","year":2016,"title":"May 31, 2016 - Cover letter to York District Court enclosing plaintiff's affidavit in YORDC-FM-10-190. Affidavit-backed litigation was continuing during the same unresolved access / enforcement period.","displayTitle":"May 31, 2016 - Cover letter to York District Court enclosing plaintiff's affidavit in YORDC-FM-10-190. Affidavit-backed litigation was continuing during the same unresolved access / enforcement period.","recordAnchor":"OneDrive court docs","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-10-190; FM-10-190 General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"Event-020","sourcePage":34,"dateLabel":"2018 later GAL period","year":2018,"title":"2018 later GAL period - Later GAL materials preserve later household context beyond the earliest 2011 / 2012 GAL lane.","displayTitle":"2018 later GAL period - Later GAL materials preserve later household context beyond the earliest 2011 / 2012 GAL lane.","recordAnchor":"Strengthens the point that there were multiple GAL periods, later investigations, and recurring concerns across years. Second supplemental amendment High Apr. 1-June 13, 2019 Second-grade attendance records show repeated absences and tardies across April, May, and June. Attendance instability was chronic and measurable, not anecdotal. OneDrive school records","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Provider / school record","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-021","sourcePage":34,"dateLabel":"Jan. 16, 2018","year":2018,"title":"Jan. 16, 2018 - Retainer payment letter to Attorney Amanda Ramirez for USD 1,000.","displayTitle":"Jan. 16, 2018 - Retainer payment letter to Attorney Amanda Ramirez for USD 1,000.","recordAnchor":"Shows Father was spending money to pursue relief rather than passively accepting the status quo. OneDrive counsel-payment docs","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["therapy","counsel","financial"]},{"id":"Event-022","sourcePage":35,"dateLabel":"Feb. 19, 2018","year":2018,"title":"Feb. 19, 2018 - Further retainer payment letter to Attorney Amanda Ramirez for USD 1,500.","displayTitle":"Feb. 19, 2018 - Further retainer payment letter to Attorney Amanda Ramirez for USD 1,500.","recordAnchor":"Further evidence of active efforts to obtain legal relief. OneDrive counsel-payment docs","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["therapy","counsel","financial"]},{"id":"Event-023","sourcePage":35,"dateLabel":"Feb. 28, 2018","year":2018,"title":"Feb. 28, 2018 - Email after child's meeting with Amy DiCarlo stated she did not think child needed further counseling but agreed to another session set for Mar. 22, 2018.","displayTitle":"Feb. 28, 2018 - Email after child's meeting with Amy DiCarlo stated she did not think child needed further counseling but agreed to another session set for Mar. 22, 2018.","recordAnchor":"Counseling records place child's emotional functioning and family stress squarely in the timeline. OneDrive counseling email","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-024","sourcePage":35,"dateLabel":"Mar. 14, 2018","year":2018,"title":"Mar. 14, 2018 - Criminal-record searches run for John Ramirez in Maine and Texas.","displayTitle":"Mar. 14, 2018 - Criminal-record searches run for John Ramirez in Maine and Texas.","recordAnchor":"Shows Father was investigating adult-context concerns affecting child's environment. OneDrive investigation docs","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-025","sourcePage":35,"dateLabel":"May 28 / 31, 2018","year":2018,"title":"May 28 / 31, 2018 - Glenn Anderson summary / report period documented child as bright and articulate but with school-focus issues and reported anxiety. A neutral court-appointed observer had long-range visibility into the relationship rupture and child's symptoms.","displayTitle":"May 28 / 31, 2018 - Glenn Anderson summary / report period documented child as bright and articulate but with school-focus issues and reported anxiety.","recordAnchor":"Google Drive chronology + OneDrive GAL report","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-026","sourcePage":35,"dateLabel":"2019 / 2020","year":2019,"title":"2019 / 2020 - Notes reflect child had been instructed to withhold information from Father and link that secrecy to anxiety. Information-control was affecting child directly, not merely frustrating Father administratively.","displayTitle":"2019 / 2020 - Notes reflect child had been instructed to withhold information from Father and link that secrecy to anxiety. Information-control was affecting child directly, not merely frustrating Father administratively.","recordAnchor":"Google Drive chronology + archived notes","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-027","sourcePage":35,"dateLabel":"May 21, 2019","year":2019,"title":"May 21, 2019 - DHHS investigator Kate Nadeau contacted Father regarding an abuse / neglect investigation involving a child in Ms. Morse's household, with child to be interviewed. A concrete state-investigation event directly touched child's household environment.","displayTitle":"May 21, 2019 - DHHS investigator Kate Nadeau contacted Father regarding an abuse / neglect investigation involving a child in Ms.","recordAnchor":"OneDrive DHHS timeline docs","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["contact","medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-028","sourcePage":36,"dateLabel":"May 21-22, 2019","year":2019,"title":"May 21-22, 2019 - Email / Messenger lane preserved communications about the DHHS matter and prior household concerns.","displayTitle":"May 21-22, 2019 - Email / Messenger lane preserved communications about the DHHS matter and prior household concerns.","recordAnchor":"The investigation did not arise in a vacuum and was being discussed across multiple channels contemporaneously. OneDrive DHHS messages","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-029","sourcePage":36,"dateLabel":"June 4, 2019","year":2019,"title":"June 4, 2019 - DHHS investigation email packet preserved the May 21 exchange and related context.","displayTitle":"June 4, 2019 - DHHS investigation email packet preserved the May 21 exchange and related context.","recordAnchor":"Further confirms the 2019 concern was documented near-contemporaneously, not reconstructed after the fact. Second supplemental amendment / DHHS packet","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-030","sourcePage":36,"dateLabel":"June 5, 2019","year":2019,"title":"June 5, 2019 - Additional counsel-payment letter during the DHHS-investigation period.","displayTitle":"June 5, 2019 - Additional counsel-payment letter during the DHHS-investigation period.","recordAnchor":"Shows Father continued spending money to respond to escalating child-related concerns. OneDrive payment letter","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["therapy","medical","counsel","safety","financial"]},{"id":"Event-031","sourcePage":36,"dateLabel":"June 27, 2019","year":2019,"title":"June 27, 2019 - Hearing-date packet for the DHHS-investigation lane.","displayTitle":"June 27, 2019 - Hearing-date packet for the DHHS-investigation lane.","recordAnchor":"The state-investigation concerns moved into formal hearing preparation. OneDrive hearing packet","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-032","sourcePage":36,"dateLabel":"Summer 2019","year":2019,"title":"Summer 2019 - child was withheld for the summer.","displayTitle":"Summer 2019 - child was withheld for the summer.","recordAnchor":"The relationship damage took the form of prolonged deprivation of contact. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Contextual / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["contact"]},{"id":"Event-033","sourcePage":36,"dateLabel":"Sept. 12, 2019","year":2019,"title":"Sept. 12, 2019 - child admitted to Sweetser therapy.","displayTitle":"Sept. 12, 2019 - child admitted to Sweetser therapy.","recordAnchor":"Therapy began immediately after a period of profound relationship disruption. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Public advocacy record","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-034","sourcePage":37,"dateLabel":"Jan. 15, 2020","year":2020,"title":"Jan. 15, 2020 - Third-grade attendance materials show additional tardies and an unexcused absence, with report generated Jan. 15, 2020.","displayTitle":"Jan. 15, 2020 - Third-grade attendance materials show additional tardies and an unexcused absence, with report generated Jan. 15, 2020.","recordAnchor":"The attendance pattern continued into the next school year. OneDrive school records","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Provider / school record","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-035","sourcePage":37,"dateLabel":"Mar. 12, 2020","year":2020,"title":"Mar. 12, 2020 - School no-call / no-show anchor.","displayTitle":"Mar. 12, 2020 - School no-call / no-show anchor.","recordAnchor":"Educational instability remained active. Google Drive chronology + second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-036","sourcePage":37,"dateLabel":"Apr. 7, 2020","year":2020,"title":"Apr. 7, 2020 - Sweetser treatment plan identified [minor health detail redacted]. child's symptoms were clinically documented, not speculative.","displayTitle":"Apr. 7, 2020 - Sweetser treatment plan identified [minor health detail redacted]. child's symptoms were clinically documented, not speculative.","recordAnchor":"Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Provider / school record","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-037","sourcePage":37,"dateLabel":"May 1, 2020","year":2020,"title":"May 1, 2020 - Father raised a front-seat vehicle-safety concern involving child to Glenn Anderson, who responded regarding Maine law.","displayTitle":"May 1, 2020 - Father raised a front-seat vehicle-safety concern involving child to Glenn Anderson, who responded regarding Maine law.","recordAnchor":"Shows Father continued to report specific safety concerns through neutral channels. OneDrive GAL exchange","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["safety"]},{"id":"Event-038","sourcePage":37,"dateLabel":"June 8, 2020","year":2020,"title":"June 8, 2020 - Tara Pullen, LCSW message lane preserved.","displayTitle":"June 8, 2020 - Tara Pullen, LCSW message lane preserved.","recordAnchor":"Therapy / counseling involvement was active and documentable. OneDrive therapist messages","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-039","sourcePage":37,"dateLabel":"July 8, 2020","year":2020,"title":"July 8, 2020 - Sweetser review tied child's stress and anxiety to parental conflict.","displayTitle":"July 8, 2020 - Sweetser review tied child's stress and anxiety to parental conflict.","recordAnchor":"The child-impact pathway was explicitly identified by treatment records. Google Drive chronology High May-Aug. 2021 Dense message / screenshot clusters preserve worsening conflict, contact barriers, and incident reporting. The archive shows continuity of the pattern, not a blank gap. OneDrive screenshot sets","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-040","sourcePage":38,"dateLabel":"Aug. 3, 2021","year":2021,"title":"Aug. 3, 2021 - OSHA submission confirmation preserved.","displayTitle":"Aug. 3, 2021 - OSHA submission confirmation preserved.","recordAnchor":"Another safety-related reporting lane was serious enough to trigger outside contact. OneDrive OSHA docs","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["contact","safety"]},{"id":"Event-041","sourcePage":38,"dateLabel":"Aug. 5, 2021","year":2021,"title":"Aug. 5, 2021 - Safety-training email regarding fall prevention / harness / lanyard / lift-platform use.","displayTitle":"Aug. 5, 2021 - Safety-training email regarding fall prevention / harness / lanyard / lift-platform use.","recordAnchor":"Shows contemporaneous safety concerns with concrete detail. OneDrive OSHA / safety email","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["safety"]},{"id":"Event-042","sourcePage":38,"dateLabel":"Aug. 9-10, 2021","year":2021,"title":"Aug. 9-10, 2021 - ER response scan and Augusta complaint-closing letter preserved.","displayTitle":"Aug. 9-10, 2021 - ER response scan and Augusta complaint-closing letter preserved.","recordAnchor":"Safety concerns were serious enough to trigger formal response materials. OneDrive OSHA / ER docs","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["safety"]},{"id":"Event-043","sourcePage":38,"dateLabel":"June 7, 2022","year":2022,"title":"June 7, 2022 - Work / conflict screenshot lane preserved.","displayTitle":"June 7, 2022 - Work / conflict screenshot lane preserved.","recordAnchor":"Continuity evidence: the archive does not show a resolved family dynamic. OneDrive screenshot sets","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-044","sourcePage":38,"dateLabel":"July 19, 2022","year":2022,"title":"July 19, 2022 - Additional screenshot lane preserved.","displayTitle":"July 19, 2022 - Additional screenshot lane preserved.","recordAnchor":"Reinforces continuing conflict / contact issues. OneDrive screenshot sets","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["contact"]},{"id":"Event-045","sourcePage":38,"dateLabel":"Sept. 14, 2022","year":2022,"title":"Sept. 14, 2022 - Additional screenshot lane preserved.","displayTitle":"Sept. 14, 2022 - Additional screenshot lane preserved.","recordAnchor":"Reinforces continuing conflict / contact issues. OneDrive screenshot sets","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["contact"]},{"id":"Event-046","sourcePage":39,"dateLabel":"Mar. 20, 2023","year":2023,"title":"Mar. 20, 2023 - Father sent [minor health detail redacted] ointment / lotion refill information to Amanda.","displayTitle":"Mar. 20, 2023 - Father sent [minor health detail redacted] ointment / lotion refill information to Amanda.","recordAnchor":"Shows active effort to communicate about child's medical care. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-047","sourcePage":39,"dateLabel":"Mar. 31, 2023","year":2023,"title":"Mar. 31, 2023 - Father notified school and Amanda that child had an [minor health detail redacted] and would be absent all day.","displayTitle":"Mar. 31, 2023 - Father notified school and Amanda that child had an [minor health detail redacted] and would be absent all day.","recordAnchor":"Adds a school / medical notice anchor in direct communications. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-048","sourcePage":39,"dateLabel":"Apr. 24, 2023","year":2023,"title":"Apr. 24, 2023 - Father emailed Amanda regarding child's missed dermatology follow-up, stating he had not been able to get ahold of her.","displayTitle":"Apr. 24, 2023 - Father emailed Amanda regarding child's missed dermatology follow-up, stating he had not been able to get ahold of her.","recordAnchor":"Explicit nonresponse anchor in a medical-follow-up lane. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-049","sourcePage":39,"dateLabel":"July 22, 2023","year":2023,"title":"July 22, 2023 - Father gave notice of child's summer vacation week.","displayTitle":"July 22, 2023 - Father gave notice of child's summer vacation week.","recordAnchor":"Shows continued use of direct written notice regarding parenting time. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-050","sourcePage":39,"dateLabel":"Oct. 2, 2023","year":2023,"title":"Oct. 2, 2023 - Father coordinated child's dental appointment with Amanda copied.","displayTitle":"Oct. 2, 2023 - Father coordinated child's dental appointment with Amanda copied.","recordAnchor":"Shows direct medical scheduling efforts with shared notice. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-051","sourcePage":39,"dateLabel":"Oct. 6, 2023","year":2023,"title":"Oct. 6, 2023 - Father forwarded a missed-appointment alert to Amanda.","displayTitle":"Oct. 6, 2023 - Father forwarded a missed-appointment alert to Amanda.","recordAnchor":"Adds a missed-medical-appointment anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-052","sourcePage":40,"dateLabel":"Oct. 9, 2023","year":2023,"title":"Oct. 9, 2023 - Amanda accepted the dentist appointment invitation.","displayTitle":"Oct. 9, 2023 - Amanda accepted the dentist appointment invitation.","recordAnchor":"Confirms active dental-appointment coordination in writing. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-053","sourcePage":40,"dateLabel":"Jan. 9, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Jan. 9, 2024 - Father forwarded permission-slip information to Amanda. School-information lane remains active in direct communications.","displayTitle":"Jan. 9, 2024 - Father forwarded permission-slip information to Amanda. School-information lane remains active in direct communications.","recordAnchor":"Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-054","sourcePage":40,"dateLabel":"May 12, 2024","year":2024,"title":"May 12, 2024 - Father emailed Amanda that neither he nor child had heard from her and she was not at the town hall for Mother's Day pickup.","displayTitle":"May 12, 2024 - Father emailed Amanda that neither he nor child had heard from her and she was not at the town hall for Mother's Day pickup.","recordAnchor":"Explicit exchange / nonresponse anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-055","sourcePage":40,"dateLabel":"May 12, 2024","year":2024,"title":"May 12, 2024 - Amanda replied that she was working, asked whether child could be picked up at the house, and said her phone had been weird.","displayTitle":"May 12, 2024 - Amanda replied that she was working, asked whether child could be picked up at the house, and said her phone had been weird.","recordAnchor":"Adds explanation / excuse lane in direct communications. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-056","sourcePage":40,"dateLabel":"May 15, 2024","year":2024,"title":"May 15, 2024 - Amanda wrote that she assumed Father was ignoring her or mad.","displayTitle":"May 15, 2024 - Amanda wrote that she assumed Father was ignoring her or mad.","recordAnchor":"Sharp / accusatory response anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-057","sourcePage":40,"dateLabel":"May 15-20, 2024","year":2024,"title":"May 15-20, 2024 - Summer-week scheduling clarification exchange continued and Father later gave August vacation dates.","displayTitle":"May 15-20, 2024 - Summer-week scheduling clarification exchange continued and Father later gave August vacation dates.","recordAnchor":"Shows recurrent direct written coordination over summer time. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-058","sourcePage":41,"dateLabel":"June 4, 2024","year":2024,"title":"June 4, 2024 - Father forwarded myofunctional-therapy information to Amanda.","displayTitle":"June 4, 2024 - Father forwarded myofunctional-therapy information to Amanda.","recordAnchor":"Medical / therapy information was being routed directly in writing. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","medical","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-059","sourcePage":41,"dateLabel":"Aug. 24, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Aug. 24, 2024 - Father emailed Amanda that he had received a voicemail, called back, hit voicemail, and had not seen any texts in weeks.","displayTitle":"Aug. 24, 2024 - Father emailed Amanda that he had received a voicemail, called back, hit voicemail, and had not seen any texts in weeks.","recordAnchor":"Explicit nonresponse / broken-direct-communication anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-060","sourcePage":41,"dateLabel":"Aug. 26-27, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Aug. 26-27, 2024 - Father stated he had received only one text in approximately the last month; contact / dentist / phone-function exchange continued.","displayTitle":"Aug. 26-27, 2024 - Father stated he had received only one text in approximately the last month; contact / dentist / phone-function exchange continued.","recordAnchor":"Shows prolonged communication instability rather than a one-off missed message. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","medical"]},{"id":"Event-061","sourcePage":41,"dateLabel":"Sept. 2, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Sept. 2, 2024 - Father emailed Amanda about child's 8th-grade Washington, D.C. trip.","displayTitle":"Sept. 2, 2024 - Father emailed Amanda about child's 8th-grade Washington, D.C. trip.","recordAnchor":"Adds education / future-planning notice lane. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-062","sourcePage":41,"dateLabel":"Oct. 29, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Oct. 29, 2024 - Father forwarded parent-teacher conference booking for Nov. 6, 2024 and online-school information to Amanda and child.","displayTitle":"Oct. 29, 2024 - Father forwarded parent-teacher conference booking for Nov. 6, 2024 and online-school information to Amanda and child.","recordAnchor":"Adds concrete school-notice anchors immediately before the November event lane. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-063","sourcePage":41,"dateLabel":"Nov. 6, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Nov. 6, 2024 - Parent-teacher conference showed child failing multiple courses; afterward, Father alleges Ms.","displayTitle":"Nov. 6, 2024 - Parent-teacher conference showed child failing multiple courses; afterward, Father alleges Ms.","recordAnchor":"Morse vaped nicotine in Father's car with child seated behind her and discussed [minor health detail redacted] / [minor health detail redacted] in child's presence. This is a specific incident combining school distress, exposure concerns, and alleged normalization of harmful adult conduct. OneDrive recent-leadup doc","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-064","sourcePage":42,"dateLabel":"Nov. 28, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Nov. 28, 2024 - Thanksgiving-period message screenshots preserved. Late-2024 conflict and exposure evidence was contemporaneously preserved.","displayTitle":"Nov. 28, 2024 - Thanksgiving-period message screenshots preserved. Late-2024 conflict and exposure evidence was contemporaneously preserved.","recordAnchor":"OneDrive text screenshots","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-065","sourcePage":42,"dateLabel":"Dec. 2, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Dec. 2, 2024 - Follow-up message screenshots preserved.","displayTitle":"Dec. 2, 2024 - Follow-up message screenshots preserved.","recordAnchor":"Continues the late-2024 evidence lane. OneDrive text screenshots","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-066","sourcePage":42,"dateLabel":"Dec. 7, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Dec. 7, 2024 - Follow-up message screenshots preserved.","displayTitle":"Dec. 7, 2024 - Follow-up message screenshots preserved.","recordAnchor":"Continues the late-2024 evidence lane. OneDrive text screenshots","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-067","sourcePage":42,"dateLabel":"Dec. 12, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Dec. 12, 2024 - Office Lens scan set preserved.","displayTitle":"Dec. 12, 2024 - Office Lens scan set preserved.","recordAnchor":"Shows a substantial late-2024 evidence packet existed contemporaneously. OneDrive scan set / uploaded zip mirror","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-068","sourcePage":42,"dateLabel":"Dec. 16, 2024","year":2024,"title":"Dec. 16, 2024 - PFA lane intensified procedural leverage in BIDDC-PA-2024-01285.","displayTitle":"Dec. 16, 2024 - PFA lane intensified procedural leverage in BIDDC-PA-2024-01285.","recordAnchor":"The family matter and protection-order procedure became tightly intertwined. Google Drive chronology + second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"BIDDC-PA-2024-01285 General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["safety"]},{"id":"Event-069","sourcePage":42,"dateLabel":"Apr. 2, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Apr. 2, 2025 - Notes reflect first appointment / therapist entry and related clerk-call activity.","displayTitle":"Apr. 2, 2025 - Notes reflect first appointment / therapist entry and related clerk-call activity.","recordAnchor":"Adds a pre-summer 2025 therapeutic-process anchor. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Contextual / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["therapy"]},{"id":"Event-070","sourcePage":43,"dateLabel":"Apr. 8, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Apr. 8, 2025 - Mediation call noted in handwritten chronology.","displayTitle":"Apr. 8, 2025 - Mediation call noted in handwritten chronology.","recordAnchor":"Shows dispute-management efforts were active before the later hearing cycle. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Contextual / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Public advocacy record","tags":["public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-071","sourcePage":43,"dateLabel":"Apr. 17, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Apr. 17, 2025 - Attendance records dated Apr. 17, 2025 were preserved.","displayTitle":"Apr. 17, 2025 - Attendance records dated Apr. 17, 2025 were preserved.","recordAnchor":"Adds a dated school-attendance anchor between 2019 / 2020 history and the 2026 disputes. Second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-072","sourcePage":43,"dateLabel":"Apr. 22, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Apr. 22, 2025 - Conditions of release issued in State of Maine v.","displayTitle":"Apr. 22, 2025 - Conditions of release issued in State of Maine v.","recordAnchor":"Justin Tahai, YRKCD-CR-2025-01242. These conditions became part of the procedural landscape shaping later communication restrictions and litigation posture. Google Drive chronology + second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"YRKCD-CR-2025-01242 General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["records"]},{"id":"Event-073","sourcePage":43,"dateLabel":"May 19, 2025","year":2025,"title":"May 19, 2025 - Mediation report and related mediation materials identified in archived source review.","displayTitle":"May 19, 2025 - Mediation report and related mediation materials identified in archived source review.","recordAnchor":"Adds a formal mediation anchor in the middle of 2025. Second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Public advocacy record","tags":["public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-074","sourcePage":43,"dateLabel":"May 23, 2025","year":2025,"title":"May 23, 2025 - Dan Pierce, LCSW counseling note listed in handwritten chronology.","displayTitle":"May 23, 2025 - Dan Pierce, LCSW counseling note listed in handwritten chronology.","recordAnchor":"Shows counseling process continued into mid-2025. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Contextual / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-075","sourcePage":43,"dateLabel":"July 17 / 18, 2025","year":2025,"title":"July 17 / 18, 2025 - Daniel Pierce clinical-summary / PA docket-hearing lane identified in archived materials and handwritten chronology.","displayTitle":"July 17 / 18, 2025 - Daniel Pierce clinical-summary / PA docket-hearing lane identified in archived materials and handwritten chronology.","recordAnchor":"Adds therapist and hearing anchors in the same mid-2025 band. Second supplemental amendment + chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Provider / school record","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-076","sourcePage":44,"dateLabel":"Aug. 4, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Aug. 4, 2025 - Note to presiding judge identified in archived source review.","displayTitle":"Aug. 4, 2025 - Note to presiding judge identified in archived source review.","recordAnchor":"Adds another pre-hearing procedural anchor. Second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-077","sourcePage":44,"dateLabel":"Aug. 18, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Aug. 18, 2025 - Zoom mediation noted in handwritten chronology.","displayTitle":"Aug. 18, 2025 - Zoom mediation noted in handwritten chronology.","recordAnchor":"Shows further formal dispute-management attempts before the September lanes. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Contextual / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Public advocacy record","tags":["public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-078","sourcePage":44,"dateLabel":"Aug. 27, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Aug. 27, 2025 - Response to objection filed; identified as background showing issues already being raised in writing.","displayTitle":"Aug. 27, 2025 - Response to objection filed; identified as background showing issues already being raised in writing.","recordAnchor":"Adds a formal filing anchor showing the issues were already preserved before 2026. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-079","sourcePage":44,"dateLabel":"Sept. 3, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Sept. 3, 2025 - Telephone status conference noted in handwritten chronology.","displayTitle":"Sept. 3, 2025 - Telephone status conference noted in handwritten chronology.","recordAnchor":"Adds a pre-hearing case-management anchor. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Contextual / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-080","sourcePage":44,"dateLabel":"Sept. 4, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Sept. 4, 2025 - PFA proceeding before Judge Sutton noted in handwritten chronology.","displayTitle":"Sept. 4, 2025 - PFA proceeding before Judge Sutton noted in handwritten chronology.","recordAnchor":"Keeps the 2025 PFA / FM overlap anchored inside the timeline. Google Drive chronology","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"Contextual / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["safety"]},{"id":"Event-081","sourcePage":44,"dateLabel":"Sept. 11, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Sept. 11, 2025 - Contempt-subpoena email lane with Bedard included his statement that the motion should be sent along with the subpoena, followed by acknowledgment of receipt.","displayTitle":"Sept. 11, 2025 - Contempt-subpoena email lane with Bedard included his statement that the motion should be sent along with the subpoena, followed by acknowledgment of receipt.","recordAnchor":"Shows active subpoena / enforcement exchange with counsel in writing. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-082","sourcePage":45,"dateLabel":"Sept. 22, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Sept. 22, 2025 - Subpoena / scheduling order / contempt-hearing anchor in York Judicial Center.","displayTitle":"Sept. 22, 2025 - Subpoena / scheduling order / contempt-hearing anchor in York Judicial Center.","recordAnchor":"Confirms contempt and enforcement issues were actively being advanced in 2025. Google Drive chronology + second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"Event-083","sourcePage":45,"dateLabel":"Sept. 22, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Sept. 22, 2025 - Order After Conference and handwritten agreement / order notes preserved therapy-only contact, continued temporary PFA, Daniel Pierce counseling, adult-controlled transport, and once-per-week therapy.","displayTitle":"Sept. 22, 2025 - Order After Conference and handwritten agreement / order notes preserved therapy-only contact, continued temporary PFA, Daniel Pierce counseling, adult-controlled transport, and once-per-week therapy.","recordAnchor":"These notes function as practical-logistics anchors for the therapy-only-contact period and show the high degree of adult-controlled structure governing contact. Second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-084","sourcePage":45,"dateLabel":"Sept. 22, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Sept. 22, 2025 - Bedard replied that a protective order barred Amanda from seeing or communicating with Father and that no meetings between them could take place.","displayTitle":"Sept. 22, 2025 - Bedard replied that a protective order barred Amanda from seeing or communicating with Father and that no meetings between them could take place.","recordAnchor":"Restrictive / gatekeeping response anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"Event-085","sourcePage":45,"dateLabel":"Sept. 22-24, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Sept. 22-24, 2025 - Continued counseling / conversation-offer / appointment-reminder emails pressed for therapy scheduling through Dan Pierce.","displayTitle":"Sept. 22-24, 2025 - Continued counseling / conversation-offer / appointment-reminder emails pressed for therapy scheduling through Dan Pierce.","recordAnchor":"Shows Father was still trying to move contact through therapy rather than bypass it. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-086","sourcePage":45,"dateLabel":"Oct. 22, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Oct. 22, 2025 - Father forwarded an attendance message to Bedard and stated he would stop complaining about these matters when he could just handle them himself.","displayTitle":"Oct. 22, 2025 - Father forwarded an attendance message to Bedard and stated he would stop complaining about these matters when he could just handle them himself.","recordAnchor":"Attendance remained a recurring, documentable problem. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-087","sourcePage":45,"dateLabel":"Nov. 3, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Nov. 3, 2025 - Discovery / witness designation email sent to Bedard with Glenn Anderson copied.","displayTitle":"Nov. 3, 2025 - Discovery / witness designation email sent to Bedard with Glenn Anderson copied.","recordAnchor":"Shows neutral-witness and evidence lanes were active before the final hearing. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"Event-088","sourcePage":46,"dateLabel":"Nov. 14, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Nov. 14, 2025 - Therapy scheduling emails pressed for remote attendance or a makeup session and asked Amanda / Pat to confirm with Cindy or provide her number.","displayTitle":"Nov. 14, 2025 - Therapy scheduling emails pressed for remote attendance or a makeup session and asked Amanda / Pat to confirm with Cindy or provide her number.","recordAnchor":"Shows that even therapy logistics depended on repeated adult coordination requests. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-089","sourcePage":46,"dateLabel":"Nov. 18, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Nov. 18, 2025 - Father sent a friendly bump and later a last good-faith effort asking for a response regarding rescheduling.","displayTitle":"Nov. 18, 2025 - Father sent a friendly bump and later a last good-faith effort asking for a response regarding rescheduling.","recordAnchor":"Explicit nonresponse anchors in the therapy-scheduling lane. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-090","sourcePage":46,"dateLabel":"Nov. 21, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Nov. 21, 2025 - Email to Bedard described Cindy's excitement about no Friday and child's reaction during scheduling.","displayTitle":"Nov. 21, 2025 - Email to Bedard described Cindy's excitement about no Friday and child's reaction during scheduling.","recordAnchor":"Adds a possible undermining / interference anchor inside the therapy period. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Medium / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-091","sourcePage":46,"dateLabel":"Nov. 24-25, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Nov. 24-25, 2025 - Attendance emails, concern emails, and new-motion service lane to Bedard continued.","displayTitle":"Nov. 24-25, 2025 - Attendance emails, concern emails, and new-motion service lane to Bedard continued.","recordAnchor":"Shows continuing instability and escalation before the December hearing-prep period. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-092","sourcePage":46,"dateLabel":"Dec. 1, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 1, 2025 - Objection to motion to disqualify forwarded; Father then copied Dan Pierce, stating his responses were clearly being shown to child.","displayTitle":"Dec. 1, 2025 - Objection to motion to disqualify forwarded; Father then copied Dan Pierce, stating his responses were clearly being shown to child.","recordAnchor":"Child exposure to litigation became an explicit written concern. Gmail + second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"Event-093","sourcePage":46,"dateLabel":"Dec. 7, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 7, 2025 - Father sent amicable resolution to reasonable requests to Bedard.","displayTitle":"Dec. 7, 2025 - Father sent amicable resolution to reasonable requests to Bedard.","recordAnchor":"Shows a written attempt to propose a resolution path before the final-hearing cycle. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"Event-094","sourcePage":47,"dateLabel":"Dec. 8, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 8, 2025 - Bedard replied, I continue to represent Amanda.","displayTitle":"Dec. 8, 2025 - Bedard replied, I continue to represent Amanda.","recordAnchor":"Nothing has changed. Terse / dismissive response anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"Event-095","sourcePage":47,"dateLabel":"Dec. 9, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 9, 2025 - Bedard replied, We have Court in January ...","displayTitle":"Dec. 9, 2025 - Bedard replied, We have Court in January ...","recordAnchor":"This proposal is not acceptable. Blunt rejection / no-accommodation anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-096","sourcePage":47,"dateLabel":"Dec. 10, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 10, 2025 - Sydney Chen sent Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Motion.","displayTitle":"Dec. 10, 2025 - Sydney Chen sent Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Motion.","recordAnchor":"Adds a paralegal-forwarding / objection lane in the run-up to hearing. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"Event-097","sourcePage":47,"dateLabel":"Dec. 11, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 11, 2025 - Cover letter to Glenn in final-hearing packet.","displayTitle":"Dec. 11, 2025 - Cover letter to Glenn in final-hearing packet.","recordAnchor":"Shows Father was still trying to get historical / neutral information before the court ahead of the hearing. OneDrive final-hearing prep","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-098","sourcePage":47,"dateLabel":"Dec. 15, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 15, 2025 - Motion to disqualify preserved the overzealous-representation lane and cited prior Glenn Anderson observations.","displayTitle":"Dec. 15, 2025 - Motion to disqualify preserved the overzealous-representation lane and cited prior Glenn Anderson observations.","recordAnchor":"Shows the fairness / overzealous-representation concern was being raised before the Jan. 2026 hearing, not invented later. Second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"Event-099","sourcePage":47,"dateLabel":"Dec. 16, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 16, 2025 - Scheduling week of Dec. 22 lane confirmed Daniel Pierce session timing.","displayTitle":"Dec. 16, 2025 - Scheduling week of Dec. 22 lane confirmed Daniel Pierce session timing.","recordAnchor":"Therapy process continued under tightly managed weekly scheduling. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-100","sourcePage":48,"dateLabel":"Dec. 17, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 17, 2025 - Father forwarded attendance records and an attendance message to Bedard.","displayTitle":"Dec. 17, 2025 - Father forwarded attendance records and an attendance message to Bedard.","recordAnchor":"Attendance issues were still being documented immediately before hearing prep. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-101","sourcePage":48,"dateLabel":"Dec. 18, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 18, 2025 - Motion for transcript at state expense referenced final hearing scheduled for Jan. 16, 2026; filing served to Bedard the same day.","displayTitle":"Dec. 18, 2025 - Motion for transcript at state expense referenced final hearing scheduled for Jan. 16, 2026; filing served to Bedard the same day.","recordAnchor":"Confirms the hearing date and Father's effort to preserve the record despite lack of funds. OneDrive final-hearing prep + Gmail service","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","court-order","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-102","sourcePage":48,"dateLabel":"Dec. 22, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 22, 2025 - Daniel Pierce subpoena and related Glenn Anderson witness-subpoena lane identified; Bedard also forwarded witness-subpoena materials.","displayTitle":"Dec. 22, 2025 - Daniel Pierce subpoena and related Glenn Anderson witness-subpoena lane identified; Bedard also forwarded witness-subpoena materials.","recordAnchor":"Shows formal steps were taken to secure neutral and therapeutic witnesses before the hearing. Second supplemental amendment + Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-103","sourcePage":48,"dateLabel":"Dec. 29, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 29, 2025 - Motion in limine and objection / opposition lane preserved; Bedard forwarded the limine filing. Pre-hearing evidentiary narrowing and record-shaping were active immediately before the final hearing.","displayTitle":"Dec. 29, 2025 - Motion in limine and objection / opposition lane preserved; Bedard forwarded the limine filing. Pre-hearing evidentiary narrowing and record-shaping were active immediately before the final hearing.","recordAnchor":"Second supplemental amendment + Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-104","sourcePage":48,"dateLabel":"Dec. 30-31, 2025","year":2025,"title":"Dec. 30-31, 2025 - Affidavit, opening statement, exhibit-list drafting lane, and Daniel Pierce appointment reminder forwarded to Amanda / Bedard.","displayTitle":"Dec. 30-31, 2025 - Affidavit, opening statement, exhibit-list drafting lane, and Daniel Pierce appointment reminder forwarded to Amanda / Bedard.","recordAnchor":"Father prepared a full evidentiary presentation rather than appearing empty-handed or reactive. OneDrive final-hearing prep + Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-105","sourcePage":48,"dateLabel":"Jan. 2, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 2, 2026 - Filing cover letter stated child-support affidavit, opening statement, affidavit, and exhibit list were enclosed for the Jan. 16 hearing and electronically sent to Bedard.","displayTitle":"Jan. 2, 2026 - Filing cover letter stated child-support affidavit, opening statement, affidavit, and exhibit list were enclosed for the Jan. 16 hearing and electronically sent to Bedard.","recordAnchor":"Opposing counsel had formal notice of Father's evidentiary presentation. OneDrive final-hearing prep","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-106","sourcePage":49,"dateLabel":"Jan. 5-6, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 5-6, 2026 - Motion-in-limine lane and counsel notice of intent to call child as a witness became part of the pre-hearing field.","displayTitle":"Jan. 5-6, 2026 - Motion-in-limine lane and counsel notice of intent to call child as a witness became part of the pre-hearing field.","recordAnchor":"Record-shaping and evidentiary narrowing were active before testimony was taken. OneDrive final-hearing prep","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["therapy","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-107","sourcePage":49,"dateLabel":"Jan. 6, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 6, 2026 - eScribers Job Ref. MEJB11071 issued for Sept. 22, 2025 hearing; private-pay deposit required; email states motion to have transcript paid by State of Maine was denied.","displayTitle":"Jan. 6, 2026 - eScribers Job Ref. MEJB11071 issued for Sept. 22, 2025 hearing; private-pay deposit required; email states motion to have transcript paid by State of Maine was denied.","recordAnchor":"Shows the private-pay transcript barrier existed before the Jan. 16 final hearing and was already tied to denial of state-payment request.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"MEJB11071 Transcript / audio / record access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","court-order","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-108","sourcePage":49,"dateLabel":"Jan. 7, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 7, 2026 - eScribers estimate for MEJB11071: approx.","displayTitle":"Jan. 7, 2026 - eScribers estimate for MEJB11071: approx.","recordAnchor":"11 pages at $4.65/page = $51.15 deposit. Prior transcript-payment issue; useful context but not the main Jan. 16 appeal record.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"MEJB11071 Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-109","sourcePage":49,"dateLabel":"Jan. 9, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 9, 2026 - Response-to-objection / pre-hearing packet lane.","displayTitle":"Jan. 9, 2026 - Response-to-objection / pre-hearing packet lane.","recordAnchor":"Father continued pressing the evidentiary record into the case. OneDrive final-hearing prep","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-110","sourcePage":49,"dateLabel":"Jan. 12, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 12, 2026 - Board of Overseers letter identified in later filings as part of the disqualification / fairness lane.","displayTitle":"Jan. 12, 2026 - Board of Overseers letter identified in later filings as part of the disqualification / fairness lane.","recordAnchor":"Shows the oversight / grievance track was already active before the Jan. 16 hearing. Second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"Event-111","sourcePage":49,"dateLabel":"Jan. 16, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 16, 2026 - Final hearing held.","displayTitle":"Jan. 16, 2026 - Final hearing held.","recordAnchor":"This is the hinge point underlying the Feb. 11 order, appeal lane, implementation disputes, and emergency posture. Google Drive + OneDrive final-hearing prep","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["appeal"]},{"id":"Event-112","sourcePage":50,"dateLabel":"Jan. 16, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 16, 2026 - Consolidated final hearing held.","displayTitle":"Jan. 16, 2026 - Consolidated final hearing held.","recordAnchor":"Later eScribers order identifies Judge John Lucy, YJC/Biddeford, 326 minutes for transcript order MEJB11138. Core hearing for disputed findings and testimony-based appeal issues.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"MEJB11138 Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-113","sourcePage":50,"dateLabel":"Jan. 20, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 20, 2026 - Motion to disqualify Patrick Bedard, objection to proposed orders, and filing of proposed orders re child support identified in archived source review.","displayTitle":"Jan. 20, 2026 - Motion to disqualify Patrick Bedard, objection to proposed orders, and filing of proposed orders re child support identified in archived source review.","recordAnchor":"Shows the post-hearing record-distortion / fairness lane was already active immediately after the hearing. Second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Financial / fee waiver / support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order","counsel","public-accountability","financial"]},{"id":"Event-114","sourcePage":50,"dateLabel":"Jan. 21, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 21, 2026 - Objection to motion to dismiss / cover letter identified in archived source review.","displayTitle":"Jan. 21, 2026 - Objection to motion to dismiss / cover letter identified in archived source review.","recordAnchor":"Shows the post-hearing procedural contest remained active and broad. Second supplemental amendment","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"Event-115","sourcePage":50,"dateLabel":"Jan. 27, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 27, 2026 - eScribers transcript-order confirmation for the Jan. 16 hearing stated that Father's motion for transcript at state's expense had been denied and that transcript production would not begin without private-pay deposit on an estimated 326-page transcript.","displayTitle":"Jan. 27, 2026 - eScribers transcript-order confirmation for the Jan. 16 hearing stated that Father's motion for transcript at state's expense had been denied and that transcript production would not begin without private-pay…","recordAnchor":"Creates a concrete transcript-barrier anchor: meaningful appellate review was converted into a private-pay problem despite pending appeal and inability-to-pay issues. Uploaded transcript-order confirmation","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["records","court-order","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-116","sourcePage":50,"dateLabel":"Jan. 27, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 27, 2026 - transcriptReply.pdf filed/served: Request/Motion for Reconsideration of denial of transcript at state expense, citing post-hearing filings, employment disruption, financial strain, need to respond/preserve record, and requesting transcript at state expense or reduced/installment arrangement.","displayTitle":"Jan. 27, 2026 - transcriptReply.pdf filed/served: Request/Motion for Reconsideration of denial of transcript at state expense, citing post-hearing filings, employment disruption, financial strain, need to respond/preserve record…","recordAnchor":"Shows Justin did exactly what OTO directed: went back to court for reconsideration and record access.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Financial / fee waiver / support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","court-order","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-117","sourcePage":50,"dateLabel":"Jan. 27, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 27, 2026 - secondLetterToday.pdf notes immediate transcript-related emails demanding private payment and says attached Gmail records show Filing -> Immediate transcript demand -> Required response.","displayTitle":"Jan. 27, 2026 - secondLetterToday.pdf notes immediate transcript-related emails demanding private payment and says attached Gmail records show Filing -> Immediate transcript demand -> Required response.","recordAnchor":"Good narrative anchor tying filing frequency to record-access demands, not frivolous filing.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal","public-accountability","financial"]},{"id":"Event-118","sourcePage":51,"dateLabel":"Jan. 27, 2026, 10:29 AM","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 27, 2026, 10:29 AM - eScribers confirmation for MEJB11138: APPEAL transcript order, Jan. 16 hearing, estimated 326 pages; special instructions state motion at state expense was denied by judge; private pay; deposit required before work starts; seven-day appeal deposit language included.","displayTitle":"Jan. 27, 2026, 10:29 AM - eScribers confirmation for MEJB11138: APPEAL transcript order, Jan. 16 hearing, estimated 326 pages; special instructions state motion at state expense was denied by judge; private pay; deposit required…","recordAnchor":"Direct proof of transcript order, estimated cost, appeal purpose, and denied state-payment posture.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"MEJB11138 Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","court-order","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-119","sourcePage":51,"dateLabel":"Jan. 27, 2026, 10:42 AM","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 27, 2026, 10:42 AM - Justin forwarded MEJB11138 issue to Maine Transcripts and eScribers, cc Bedard, attaching transcriptReply.pdf.","displayTitle":"Jan. 27, 2026, 10:42 AM - Justin forwarded MEJB11138 issue to Maine Transcripts and eScribers, cc Bedard, attaching transcriptReply.pdf.","recordAnchor":"Shows immediate notice to transcript/OTO channel and opposing counsel.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"MEJB11138 Transcript / audio / record access; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","records","appeal","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-120","sourcePage":51,"dateLabel":"Jan. 27, 2026, 10:44 AM","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 27, 2026, 10:44 AM - Carrie Jordan, Transcript Production Supervisor, Office of Transcript Operations, replied: OTO/eScribers cannot overrule a judge; file what needs to be filed with YJC; for now it is private pay until a judge says otherwise.","displayTitle":"Jan. 27, 2026, 10:44 AM - Carrie Jordan, Transcript Production Supervisor, Office of Transcript Operations, replied: OTO/eScribers cannot overrule a judge; file what needs to be filed with YJC; for now it is private pay until a…","recordAnchor":"Direct OTO position: the remedy was judicial reconsideration/clarification, not vendor discretion.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-121","sourcePage":51,"dateLabel":"Jan. 27, 2026, 12:36 PM","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 27, 2026, 12:36 PM - eScribers estimate email for MEJB11138: 326 pages x $4.65 = $1,515.90 deposit required before transcription begins.","displayTitle":"Jan. 27, 2026, 12:36 PM - eScribers estimate email for MEJB11138: 326 pages x $4.65 = $1,515.90 deposit required before transcription begins.","recordAnchor":"Concrete amount and timing of private-pay barrier.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"MEJB11138 Transcript / audio / record access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-122","sourcePage":51,"dateLabel":"Jan. 27, 2026, 12:38 PM","year":2026,"title":"Jan. 27, 2026, 12:38 PM - Justin forwarded transcript order / MEJB11138 material to Bedard and Amanda Ramirez with secondLetterToday.pdf.","displayTitle":"Jan. 27, 2026, 12:38 PM - Justin forwarded transcript order / MEJB11138 material to Bedard and Amanda Ramirez with secondLetterToday.pdf.","recordAnchor":"Opposing counsel and counsel contact received transcript-access/financial-strain documentation.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"MEJB11138 Transcript / audio / record access; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Financial / fee waiver / support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","records","appeal","counsel","financial"]},{"id":"Event-123","sourcePage":51,"dateLabel":"Feb. 4, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 4, 2026 - Request for status of pending decision noted 19 days had passed since the hearing without a written order.","displayTitle":"Feb. 4, 2026 - Request for status of pending decision noted 19 days had passed since the hearing without a written order.","recordAnchor":"Delay itself had become part of the deprivation pattern. OneDrive 2026 filings","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-124","sourcePage":52,"dateLabel":"Feb. 11, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 11, 2026 - District Court findings and order entered in FM and PFA matters.","displayTitle":"Feb. 11, 2026 - District Court findings and order entered in FM and PFA matters.","recordAnchor":"This order became the pivot for appeals, implementation fights, contact restriction, logistics conflict, and emergency filings. Google Drive chronology + OneDrive appeal lane","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["contact","court-order","appeal","safety"]},{"id":"Event-125","sourcePage":52,"dateLabel":"Feb. 11, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 11, 2026 - Trial court entered operative Findings and Order; later filings and appeal flowed from this order.","displayTitle":"Feb. 11, 2026 - Trial court entered operative Findings and Order; later filings and appeal flowed from this order.","recordAnchor":"Starts the post-order appeal / record-preservation clock.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-126","sourcePage":52,"dateLabel":"Feb. 12, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 12, 2026 - AOC complaint lane opened.","displayTitle":"Feb. 12, 2026 - AOC complaint lane opened.","recordAnchor":"Father escalated beyond ordinary motion practice into complaint / oversight channels. OneDrive 2026 filings","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"Event-127","sourcePage":52,"dateLabel":"Feb. 13-14, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 13-14, 2026 - Supplement / amendment to pending motion to modify added child-support modification and temporary relief; Rule 52(b) supplemental motions requested omitted contempt findings; notices of appeal and fee-waiver / transcript-audio notice were filed.","displayTitle":"Feb. 13-14, 2026 - Supplement / amendment to pending motion to modify added child-support modification and temporary relief; Rule 52(b) supplemental motions requested omitted contempt findings; notices of appeal and fee-waiver /…","recordAnchor":"Father moved immediately to preserve rights, challenge deficiencies, and keep the appeal viable despite financial hardship. Uploaded 2026 filings","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal; Financial / fee waiver / support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["records","court-order","appeal","public-accountability","financial"]},{"id":"Event-128","sourcePage":52,"dateLabel":"2026-02-14","year":2026,"title":"February 14, 2026 - Rule 52(b) motions challenge the Thanksgiving transition finding, Monday retrieval narrative, and scope of therapist testimony","displayTitle":"February 14, 2026 - Rule 52 challenge: the order says a Thanksgiving transition occurred; the filing says the testimony established that it did not","recordAnchor":"The February 14 Rule 52(b) motions challenge three specific portions of the February 11 order. The filing states that testimony, including Ms. Morse’s, established that the child did not transition to the father on Thanksgiving Day, remained with Ms. Morse until the following Monday, and was at the father’s residence for only approximately two to three hours that Monday. It also challenges any implication that Ms. Morse first attempted to communicate before the Monday retrieval and states that Daniel Pierce testified only that the father initially appeared nervous—not that he engaged in threatening, violent, or intimidating conduct in session.","whyItMatters":"This places claimed contradictions between the written order and the hearing testimony directly into the post-order record and preserves the need for transcript/audio review.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-24-1285 Findings / appeal preservation / transcript record","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"20260214180246.pdf pages 1-3; afterOrderDated02112026_2.odt; afterOrderDated02112026_3.odt; afterOrderDated02112026_4.odt","statusLimitations":"High for the content of the filed Rule 52 motions. This entry proves that the corrections were requested; it does not establish that the trial court amended the findings or that an appellate court accepted the challenge.","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order","appeal","contact","therapy","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-129","sourcePage":53,"dateLabel":"2026-02-14","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-14 - Supplement/amendment to pending motion to modify added child-support modification and interim relief request","displayTitle":"2026-02-14 - Supplement/amendment to pending motion to modify added child-support modification and interim relief request","recordAnchor":"Filing asks the court to treat the submission as a supplement/amendment to the February 13 motion to modify, expressly adding a request to modify child support and temporary/interim relief based on current inability to pay, with requested effective date February 13 or docketing date.","whyItMatters":"Supports hardship, fee-waiver, appeal-cost, and child-support modification lanes; also contextualizes transcript/audio affordability issues.","caseIssue":"Child support / financial hardship / interim relief","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"afterOrderDated02112026.odt; 20260214180246.pdf batch","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-130","sourcePage":53,"dateLabel":"2026-02-14","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-14 - Notices of appeal and fee-waiver/transcript-audio status notice prepared for FM and PA dockets","displayTitle":"February 14, 2026 - Appeal materials preserve exclusion of former GAL Glenn Anderson testimony as an appellate issue","recordAnchor":"The after-order appeal materials preserved exclusion of former GAL Glenn Anderson’s testimony as an appellate issue. Anderson’s January 6 letter had stated that Patrick Bedard’s motion in limine contained inaccuracies, documented later GAL appointments in 2018 and 2019, and stated that Anderson had been subpoenaed and intended to appear at the January 16 hearing unless directed otherwise.","whyItMatters":"This preserves the neutral-history and record-shaping issue alongside the challenged findings. The final order identifies testimony from the parties and Daniel Pierce, not Anderson.","caseIssue":"Appeal / fee waiver / transcript audio","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"afterOrderDated02112026_2.odt; Glenn_Anderson_Letter_20260106_Bedard_Motion_Inaccuracies.pdf; February 11 Findings and Order.","statusLimitations":"High for the content of the documents and the preserved appellate issue. Admissibility, prejudice, and any allegation of improper deference remain legal questions—not findings of misconduct on this record.","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order","appeal","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-131","sourcePage":53,"dateLabel":"2026-02-14 16:20 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-14 16:20 ET - First documented post-order electronic-contact logistics request sent to Morse, copied to Bedard and Pierce","displayTitle":"2026-02-14 16:20 ET - First documented post-order electronic-contact logistics request sent to Morse, copied to Bedard and Pierce","recordAnchor":"The February 16 compliance email records that on February 14 at 4:20 PM, Justin emailed Amanda Morse, copying Patrick Bedard and Daniel Pierce, requesting child's current telephone number and video/messaging platform information to begin electronic contact under the February 11 order.","whyItMatters":"Creates the first precise post-order contact-implementation timestamp; shows basic logistics were requested before later nonresponse/implementation filings.","caseIssue":"Electronic contact / implementation logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"1 - Compliance email chain start.pdf","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-132","sourcePage":53,"dateLabel":"Feb. 14, 2026, 4:20 PM","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 14, 2026, 4:20 PM - Father emailed Ms.","displayTitle":"Feb. 14, 2026, 4:20 PM - Father emailed Ms.","recordAnchor":"Morse and copied counsel requesting child's current number and video / messaging platform information so electronic contact could begin under the order. Electronic-contact implementation required immediate basic logistics that were still not provided at that point. Compliance email chain / Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Parent-child contact implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-133","sourcePage":53,"dateLabel":"2026-02-14 16:48-21:38 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-14 16:48-21:38 ET - Bedard office said it lacked the order; share-link response and follow-up request followed the same day","displayTitle":"2026-02-14 16:48-21:38 ET - Bedard office said it lacked the order; share-link response and follow-up request followed the same day","recordAnchor":"The February 16 compliance email records Bedard's office response at 4:48 PM that it did not have a copy of the order, Justin's 4:52 PM response that he would send a share link due to file-size limits, and a 9:38 PM follow-up requesting a Monday afternoon time to speak directly with child after no contact logistics were provided.","whyItMatters":"Shows same-day attempt to cure the asserted lack of order and continued lack of contact logistics after the order issued.","caseIssue":"Electronic contact / service of order / nonresponse","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"1 - Compliance email chain start.pdf","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-134","sourcePage":54,"dateLabel":"Feb. 16, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 16, 2026 - Compliance email to Bedard documented pending appeal, requested confirmation of therapy attendance, reimbursement, electronic-contact logistics, in-person scheduling process, and records / insurance access.","displayTitle":"Feb. 16, 2026 - Compliance email to Bedard documented pending appeal, requested confirmation of therapy attendance, reimbursement, electronic-contact logistics, in-person scheduling process, and records / insurance access.","recordAnchor":"Shows Father was attempting to implement the order in a documented, logistics-focused way rather than merely objecting to it. Compliance email chain","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","medical","appeal","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-135","sourcePage":54,"dateLabel":"2026-02-16 14:42 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-16 14:42 ET - Comprehensive compliance email sent to Bedard regarding February 11 order implementation","displayTitle":"2026-02-16 14:42 ET - Comprehensive compliance email sent to Bedard regarding February 11 order implementation","recordAnchor":"Email to Patrick Bedard, cc Daniel Pierce and Amanda Morse, bcc Amanda Ramirez, states Justin will comply with the order pending appeal and requests written confirmation on therapy attendance/cost allocation, electronic contact platform/window, in-person contact timeline, healthcare/education/insurance/records access, child-support circumstances, and documentation framework within 48 hours.","whyItMatters":"Central implementation notice; frames the dispute as logistics and reciprocal compliance rather than refusal to follow the order.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-24-1285 Implementation / therapy / electronic contact / records access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"1 - Compliance email chain start.pdf","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","medical","records","appeal","counsel","financial"]},{"id":"Event-136","sourcePage":54,"dateLabel":"2026-02-18","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-18 - Motion for expedited consideration filed in Yor-26-46","displayTitle":"2026-02-18 - Motion for expedited consideration filed in Yor-26-46","recordAnchor":"Motion seeks expedited consideration under M.R. App. P. 7(b)(4) and Rule 10, citing child-related delay and proposing an expedited briefing schedule. It states counsel was contacted around February 15 to determine position and no response had been received at filing.","whyItMatters":"Supports appellate urgency and no-response lane tied to child/contact implementation.","caseIssue":"Yor-26-46; BIDDC-PA-2024-[private address redacted] appeal / expedited consideration","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Yor-26-46_Motion_for_Expedited_Consideration_Rule_7b4.pdf","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["contact","therapy","court-order","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-137","sourcePage":54,"dateLabel":"2026-02-18","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-18 - Motion for electronic recording/audio in lieu of transcript filed/served in BIDDC-PA-2024-01285","displayTitle":"2026-02-18 - Motion for electronic recording/audio in lieu of transcript filed/served in BIDDC-PA-2024-01285","recordAnchor":"Motion asks the District Court to approve and direct production of the electronic recording of the January 16 hearing in lieu of transcript under M.R. Civ. P. 91(f)(2) and M.R. App. P. 5, or set a settled statement process. Proposed order seeks audio within seven days or a statement schedule.","whyItMatters":"Preserves record-access alternative before later transcript-payment/cancellation disputes and establishes that audio/statement-in-lieu relief was requested.","caseIssue":"BIDDC-PA-2024-01285; Yor-26-118 Transcript/audio/record completion","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"BIDDC-PA-2024-01285_Motion_Audio_Recording_In_Lieu_of_Transcript.pdf","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-138","sourcePage":54,"dateLabel":"2026-02-18","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-18 - Motion to clarify contact implementation challenged unilateral-veto reading of allocated authority","displayTitle":"2026-02-18 - Motion to clarify contact implementation challenged unilateral-veto reading of allocated authority","recordAnchor":"Motion asks the District Court to clarify that the February 11 order's allocated-authority language does not authorize unilateral denial of court-ordered contact or progression, and that disputes over safeguards or increases must be resolved by agreement or prompt court review/status conference.","whyItMatters":"Directly preserves the child-gatekeeper/unilateral-control issue that later reappears in April and May implementation disputes.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-24-1285 Contact implementation / allocated authority / court clarification","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"afterOrderDated02112026_4.odt; 20260214180246.pdf","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["contact","court-order"]},{"id":"Event-139","sourcePage":55,"dateLabel":"2026-02-18","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-18 - Interim logistics order motion drafted for electronic contact, therapy/exchange, school punctuality, and records/authorizations","displayTitle":"2026-02-18 - Interim logistics order motion drafted for electronic contact, therapy/exchange, school punctuality, and records/authorizations","recordAnchor":"Motion requests an interim order requiring phone/platform/contact window, timely production for therapy/in-person contact, transport/exchange protocol, school punctuality notice, and provision of medical, school, insurance, MaineCare/DHHS access information and authorizations within 72 hours.","whyItMatters":"Shows early request for concrete, enforceable logistics necessary to implement the February 11 order and reduce recurring motion practice.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190 Implementation logistics / records access / school punctuality","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Motion_for_Interim_Order_Implementing_and_Clarifying_Logistics.docx","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["contact","therapy","school","medical","records","court-order","safety"]},{"id":"Event-140","sourcePage":55,"dateLabel":"Feb. 18, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 18, 2026 - Motion for expedited consideration in Yor-26-46 stated Father had contacted opposing counsel about expedition and had received no response.","displayTitle":"Feb. 18, 2026 - Motion for expedited consideration in Yor-26-46 stated Father had contacted opposing counsel about expedition and had received no response.","recordAnchor":"Adds a no-response anchor in the appellate lane. Law Court motion","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-[private address redacted] / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["contact","therapy","court-order","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-141","sourcePage":55,"dateLabel":"Feb. 18, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 18, 2026 - Motion for approval and production of electronic recording in lieu of transcript again stated Father had contacted opposing counsel and had received no response.","displayTitle":"Feb. 18, 2026 - Motion for approval and production of electronic recording in lieu of transcript again stated Father had contacted opposing counsel and had received no response.","recordAnchor":"Shows transcript / audio access remained blocked while opposing counsel still gave no answer. Audio-in-lieu motion","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["contact","therapy","records","court-order","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-142","sourcePage":55,"dateLabel":"Feb. 18, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 18, 2026 - Motion to clarify contact implementation asked the court to confirm that Amanda's allocated authority did not operate as a unilateral veto over contact progression.","displayTitle":"Feb. 18, 2026 - Motion to clarify contact implementation asked the court to confirm that Amanda's allocated authority did not operate as a unilateral veto over contact progression.","recordAnchor":"Father was trying to prevent the order from being turned into a one-sided gatekeeping device. Uploaded 2026 motion set","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Parent-child contact implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["contact","court-order"]},{"id":"Event-143","sourcePage":55,"dateLabel":"Feb. 18, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 18, 2026 - Motion for interim order implementing and clarifying logistics requested confirmed phone / platform / time window, transport rules, school punctuality notice, and medical / school / insurance authorizations within 72 hours.","displayTitle":"Feb. 18, 2026 - Motion for interim order implementing and clarifying logistics requested confirmed phone / platform / time window, transport rules, school punctuality notice, and medical / school / insurance authorizations within…","recordAnchor":"Father was seeking a practical mechanism for actual contact and access, not merely abstract appellate relief. Motion for interim logistics","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["contact","school","medical","records","court-order","appeal","safety"]},{"id":"Event-144","sourcePage":56,"dateLabel":"Feb. 18, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 18, 2026 - BIDDC-PA-2024-01285 Motion for Approval and Production of Electronic Recording in Lieu of Transcript served on Bedard. It requested audio of the Jan. 16 hearing for the Law Court record, or a settled statement in lieu of transcript.","displayTitle":"Feb. 18, 2026 - BIDDC-PA-2024-01285 Motion for Approval and Production of Electronic Recording in Lieu of Transcript served on Bedard.","recordAnchor":"Preserves audio/statement-in-lieu alternative and requests a firm schedule.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"BIDDC-PA-2024-01285 Transcript / audio / record access; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","court-order","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-145","sourcePage":56,"dateLabel":"Feb. 19, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 19, 2026 - Letter to Bedard again requested implementation logistics and warned that continued silence would be treated as refusal to provide a workable written plan.","displayTitle":"Feb. 19, 2026 - Letter to Bedard again requested implementation logistics and warned that continued silence would be treated as refusal to provide a workable written plan.","recordAnchor":"Adds a hard nonresponse / refusal anchor in the immediate post-order window. Letter to Bedard","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Public advocacy record","tags":["counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-146","sourcePage":56,"dateLabel":"2026-02-20","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-20 - Consolidated implementation/status-conference filing packet submitted to clerk","displayTitle":"2026-02-20 - Consolidated implementation/status-conference filing packet submitted to clerk","recordAnchor":"Scanned packet addressed to the Clerk requests docketing of a consolidated and supplemental motion for expedited status conference, interim implementation order, and clarification, alleging post-February 11 lack of written implementation information for electronic contact, therapy/transport logistics, and records/authorizations.","whyItMatters":"Shows the implementation issue escalated from email requests into a consolidated court filing within nine days of the order.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190 Implementation / expedited status conference / interim order","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"20260220175445.pdf pages 1-3; Motion_for_Interim_Order_Implementing_and_Clarifying_Logistics.docx","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","records","court-order"]},{"id":"Event-147","sourcePage":56,"dateLabel":"2026-02-20","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-20 - Supplemental Board grievance update filed in GCF-25-524 regarding post-February 11 implementation obstruction","displayTitle":"2026-02-20 - Supplemental Board grievance update filed in GCF-25-524 regarding post-February 11 implementation obstruction","recordAnchor":"Supplemental update to the Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar states that post-February 11 written requests for electronic contact, therapy scheduling, transport, and records/authorization access including MaineCare/DHHS coordination had not been meaningfully addressed; asks that the update be added to GCF-25-524.","whyItMatters":"Links immediate post-order nonresponse/implementation friction to the professional-conduct oversight lane against Patrick Bedard.","caseIssue":"GCF-25-524; YORDC-FM-2010-00190 Professional conduct / implementation obstruction","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"bedardComplaintSupplemental.pdf","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["contact","therapy","medical","records","counsel","public-accountability","safety"]},{"id":"Event-148","sourcePage":56,"dateLabel":"2026-02-20","year":2026,"title":"2026-02-20 - Amended/supplemental GCF-25-524 complaint organized professional-conduct allegations and evidence workbook concept","displayTitle":"2026-02-20 - Amended/supplemental GCF-25-524 complaint organized professional-conduct allegations and evidence workbook concept","recordAnchor":"Updated complaint identifies allegations concerning unsupported factual assertions, procedural gamesmanship, obstruction/friction implementing court-ordered obligations, and draft-order/paralegal-forwarding practice; requests Board review of the evidence workbook and consideration of Glenn Anderson as a witness.","whyItMatters":"Preserves the structure of the professional-conduct lane and the request for witness review with long-range GAL perspective.","caseIssue":"GCF-25-524 Professional conduct / evidence organization / GAL witness","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Amended Complaint GCF-25-524.pdf","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / source-confirmed","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-149","sourcePage":57,"dateLabel":"Feb. 20, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 20, 2026 - Supplemental update to judicial-conduct complaint reported that more than a week after the Feb. 11 order, implementation remained obstructed and the quoted USD 1,515 transcript barrier still impaired meaningful review.","displayTitle":"Feb. 20, 2026 - Supplemental update to judicial-conduct complaint reported that more than a week after the Feb. 11 order, implementation remained obstructed and the quoted USD 1,515 transcript barrier still impaired meaningful review.","recordAnchor":"Shows that enforceability and record access were being raised as fairness and public-confidence problems almost immediately. Judicial-conduct supplemental","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["records","appeal","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-150","sourcePage":57,"dateLabel":"Feb. 20, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 20, 2026 - Supplemental Board grievance update stated that written requests for electronic contact, therapy scheduling, transport, and records / authorizations had not been meaningfully addressed.","displayTitle":"Feb. 20, 2026 - Supplemental Board grievance update stated that written requests for electronic contact, therapy scheduling, transport, and records / authorizations had not been meaningfully addressed.","recordAnchor":"Shows nonresponse / implementation obstruction was already being framed as professional-conduct prejudice in real time. Board grievance supplemental","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Parent-child contact implementation; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["contact","therapy","medical","records","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-151","sourcePage":57,"dateLabel":"Feb. 28, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Feb. 28, 2026 - Rule 5 service / Law Court fee-waiver and appeal materials served in related emails, including appeal packet materials.","displayTitle":"Feb. 28, 2026 - Rule 5 service / Law Court fee-waiver and appeal materials served in related emails, including appeal packet materials.","recordAnchor":"Shows continued appeal/fee-waiver channel and formal service.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-152","sourcePage":57,"dateLabel":"2026-03-02","year":2026,"title":"2026-03-02 - Application to proceed without payment of fees signed for FM/PA matters","displayTitle":"2026-03-02 - Application to proceed without payment of fees signed for FM/PA matters","recordAnchor":"Photographed CV-067 application shows Justin Tahai as plaintiff/applicant, District Court Biddeford, dockets YORDC-FM-2010-00190 and handwritten BIDDC-PA-2024-01285, with service-cost/fee waiver boxes marked and date 03/02/2026.","whyItMatters":"Independent image-source corroboration for fee-waiver/inability-to-pay and appeal/transcript-cost lane already reflected in the master timeline.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-2024-01285 Fee waiver / inability to pay / record access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"20260323_180500.jpg; 20260323_180507.jpg","statusLimitations":"High for visible form content / SOURCE-CONFIRM / already substantially carried forward","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["records","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-153","sourcePage":57,"dateLabel":"Mar. 2, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 2, 2026 - Father filed an Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fees in YORDC-FM-2010-00190 and handwritten-added BIDDC-PA-2024-01285, stating he was unemployed, had no income, no cash reserves, no available assets, and no present ability to pay filing or appeal-related costs.","displayTitle":"Mar. 2, 2026 - Father filed an Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fees in YORDC-FM-2010-00190 and handwritten-added BIDDC-PA-2024-01285, stating he was unemployed, had no income, no cash reserves, no available assets, and no…","recordAnchor":"Direct indigency / inability-to-pay anchor, not merely a later claim of hardship. Uploaded fee-waiver application","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-2024-[private address redacted] / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-154","sourcePage":58,"dateLabel":"Mar. 2, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 2, 2026 - PACER activation letter issued to Father with federal case-search activation instructions.","displayTitle":"Mar. 2, 2026 - PACER activation letter issued to Father with federal case-search activation instructions.","recordAnchor":"Shows Father was actively preparing parallel federal / record-review capability during the same period rather than sitting idle. Uploaded PACER activation letter","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-155","sourcePage":58,"dateLabel":"Mar. 2, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 2, 2026 - Office of Transcript Operations notified Father that because eScribers had not received the required deposit, the transcript order was being cancelled, the Law Court would be copied, and the appeal would proceed without the transcript unless further action was taken.","displayTitle":"Mar. 2, 2026 - Office of Transcript Operations notified Father that because eScribers had not received the required deposit, the transcript order was being cancelled, the Law Court would be copied, and the appeal would proceed…","recordAnchor":"One of the strongest record-access barrier anchors in the entire file: the appeal was pushed forward without the transcript because the transcript system remained paywalled. Uploaded transcript-cancellation letter","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["records","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-156","sourcePage":58,"dateLabel":"Mar. 2, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 2, 2026 - April [private address redacted] order later states District Court entered a March 2 order denying transcript/audio at state expense.","displayTitle":"Mar. 2, 2026 - April [private address redacted] order later states District Court entered a March 2 order denying transcript/audio at state expense.","recordAnchor":"Direct Gmail copy of that March 2 order was not located in searched messages/attachments. Critical missing-source item; ask clerk to provide the actual order/docket entry.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["records","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-157","sourcePage":58,"dateLabel":"Mar. 5, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 5, 2026 - Court order on the fee-waiver application appears to grant relief under item 1, including waiver of the filing fee.","displayTitle":"Mar. 5, 2026 - Court order on the fee-waiver application appears to grant relief under item 1, including waiver of the filing fee.","recordAnchor":"Supports the position that the court had documentary notice of indigency and good-faith inability to pay costs during the appeal period. Uploaded fee-waiver order","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["court-order","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-158","sourcePage":58,"dateLabel":"Mar. 5, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 5, 2026 - Yor-26-46 Notice Regarding Transcript Order Status filed with Law Court, cc Bedard. Gmail subject/snippet says notice informed Court the transcript order was cancelled. Attachment was scanned/image-only and did not parse text.","displayTitle":"Mar. 5, 2026 - Yor-26-46 Notice Regarding Transcript Order Status filed with Law Court, cc Bedard. Gmail subject/snippet says notice informed Court the transcript order was cancelled.","recordAnchor":"This is the clearest Gmail-located mention that the transcript order was cancelled before the April 29 order.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-46 Transcript / audio / record access; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-159","sourcePage":58,"dateLabel":"Mar. 10, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 10, 2026 - Father emailed Amanda and Dan Pierce asking whether something had happened with child because child's texts suggested distress.","displayTitle":"Mar. 10, 2026 - Father emailed Amanda and Dan Pierce asking whether something had happened with child because child's texts suggested distress.","recordAnchor":"Father was trying to identify and respond to child's emotional state in real time. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"Event-160","sourcePage":59,"dateLabel":"Mar. 10, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 10, 2026 - Amanda replied, He's mad at you.","displayTitle":"Mar. 10, 2026 - Amanda replied, He's mad at you.","recordAnchor":"Terse / non-explanatory / emotionally loaded response anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order"]},{"id":"Event-161","sourcePage":59,"dateLabel":"Mar. 10, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 10, 2026 - Father then asked for specifics so he could respond supportively.","displayTitle":"Mar. 10, 2026 - Father then asked for specifics so he could respond supportively.","recordAnchor":"Shows he sought substance, not just conflict. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-162","sourcePage":59,"dateLabel":"Mar. 12, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 12, 2026 - Father emailed Amanda about child's school absence that day; implementation / in-person-contact thread also remained active.","displayTitle":"Mar. 12, 2026 - Father emailed Amanda about child's school absence that day; implementation / in-person-contact thread also remained active.","recordAnchor":"Attendance and contact issues were running in parallel. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","school"]},{"id":"Event-163","sourcePage":59,"dateLabel":"Mar. 15, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 15, 2026 - Amanda replied regarding contact that Father could text or call child if child chose to speak with him. Conditionalized-contact / child-choice framing anchor.","displayTitle":"Mar. 15, 2026 - Amanda replied regarding contact that Father could text or call child if child chose to speak with him. Conditionalized-contact / child-choice framing anchor.","recordAnchor":"Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact"]},{"id":"Event-164","sourcePage":59,"dateLabel":"Mar. 18, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 18, 2026 - Amanda wrote that child's birth certificate was his, not Father's, and that there was no reason Father should have possession of it.","displayTitle":"Mar. 18, 2026 - Amanda wrote that child's birth certificate was his, not Father's, and that there was no reason Father should have possession of it.","recordAnchor":"Sharp / adversarial response anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy"]},{"id":"Event-165","sourcePage":59,"dateLabel":"Mar. 18, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 18, 2026 - Bedard replied that child had indicated he did not want in-person counseling with Father and that there was no proof Father had completed what the court ordered.","displayTitle":"Mar. 18, 2026 - Bedard replied that child had indicated he did not want in-person counseling with Father and that there was no proof Father had completed what the court ordered.","recordAnchor":"Gatekeeping / compliance-challenge anchor used to constrain contact progression. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["contact","therapy","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-166","sourcePage":60,"dateLabel":"Mar. 19, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 19, 2026 - Docketing notice in Yor-26-118 issued. It states the appeal was docketed Mar. 10, the record would be sent by Apr. 6, any transcript due by Apr. 30 if ordered and paid for, and the Court will not pay for transcript in this case. It also states Justin had not opted into electronic service and must be served paper documents.","displayTitle":"Mar. 19, 2026 - Docketing notice in Yor-26-118 issued. It states the appeal was docketed Mar. 10, the record would be sent by Apr. 6, any transcript due by Apr. 30 if ordered and paid for, and the Court will not pay for transcript in this case.","recordAnchor":"Important service and transcript-payment notice. It does not itself appear to be the OTO cancellation letter.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118 Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-167","sourcePage":60,"dateLabel":"Mar. 19, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 19, 2026 - April [private address redacted] order later states OTO sent a March 19 letter cancelling the transcript order for nonpayment. No direct copy of this specific March 19 OTO cancellation letter was found in Gmail searches.","displayTitle":"Mar. 19, 2026 - April [private address redacted] order later states OTO sent a March 19 letter cancelling the transcript order for nonpayment.","recordAnchor":"Critical missing proof/service issue.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-168","sourcePage":60,"dateLabel":"Mar. 19-20, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 19-20, 2026 - Law Court issued scanned image-only orders in Yor-26-118; text did not parse.","displayTitle":"Mar. 19-20, 2026 - Law Court issued scanned image-only orders in Yor-26-118; text did not parse.","recordAnchor":"These were identified in Gmail but could not be text-reviewed without OCR/manual visual review. Preserve as scanned orders requiring manual/OCR review if needed.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-[private address redacted] / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal"]},{"id":"Event-169","sourcePage":60,"dateLabel":"Mar. 20, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 20, 2026 - Father followed up after reunification session, noting child again declined in-person visitation based on unspecified concerns.","displayTitle":"Mar. 20, 2026 - Father followed up after reunification session, noting child again declined in-person visitation based on unspecified concerns.","recordAnchor":"Shows the rupture remained active and was still being framed without concrete specifics. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-170","sourcePage":60,"dateLabel":"Mar. 20, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 20, 2026 - Law Court order in Yor-26-118 denied Father's motion to reconsider the prior denial of his motion to expedite the appeal; the order states the Court did not wait for any response before denying reconsideration.","displayTitle":"Mar. 20, 2026 - Law Court order in Yor-26-118 denied Father's motion to reconsider the prior denial of his motion to expedite the appeal; the order states the Court did not wait for any response before denying reconsideration.","recordAnchor":"Adds a direct appellate-delay anchor: even reconsideration of expedition was denied while contact, implementation, and record-access disputes remained active. Uploaded Law Court order image","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-[private address redacted] / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["contact","court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-171","sourcePage":60,"dateLabel":"Mar. 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 22, 2026 - Father sent follow-up on reunification contact scheduling and explicitly stated he had not received a response.","displayTitle":"Mar. 22, 2026 - Father sent follow-up on reunification contact scheduling and explicitly stated he had not received a response.","recordAnchor":"Explicit nonresponse anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-172","sourcePage":61,"dateLabel":"Mar. 23, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 23, 2026 - Father emailed Bedard that more than 30 days had passed since the Feb. 11 order with no meaningful implementation.","displayTitle":"Mar. 23, 2026 - Father emailed Bedard that more than 30 days had passed since the Feb. 11 order with no meaningful implementation.","recordAnchor":"Explicit nonimplementation anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"Event-173","sourcePage":61,"dateLabel":"Mar. 24, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 24, 2026 - Bedard forwarded objections with the terse line, See attached being filed. Pat.","displayTitle":"Mar. 24, 2026 - Bedard forwarded objections with the terse line, See attached being filed. Pat.","recordAnchor":"Curt procedural-response anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"Event-174","sourcePage":61,"dateLabel":"Mar. 26, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 26, 2026 - Request for expedited consideration filed in Yor-26-46.","displayTitle":"Mar. 26, 2026 - Request for expedited consideration filed in Yor-26-46.","recordAnchor":"Appellate emergency relief became necessary because ordinary trial-court functioning was not solving the underlying harm. Google Drive March packet","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-[private address redacted] / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["appeal"]},{"id":"Event-175","sourcePage":61,"dateLabel":"Mar. 27, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 27, 2026 - Father documented that he had not been provided notice of child's school field trip. School-notice / information-obstruction anchor.","displayTitle":"Mar. 27, 2026 - Father documented that he had not been provided notice of child's school field trip. School-notice / information-obstruction anchor.","recordAnchor":"Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-176","sourcePage":61,"dateLabel":"Mar. 31, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Mar. 31, 2026 - Amanda sent ER visit email regarding [minor health detail redacted], walk-in evaluation, and ER routing. Medical-information lane moved into urgent territory.","displayTitle":"Mar. 31, 2026 - Amanda sent ER visit email regarding [minor health detail redacted], walk-in evaluation, and ER routing. Medical-information lane moved into urgent territory.","recordAnchor":"Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-177","sourcePage":61,"dateLabel":"Apr. 1, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 1, 2026 - Father immediately replied requesting ER name / location, current status, physician status, and related details.","displayTitle":"Apr. 1, 2026 - Father immediately replied requesting ER name / location, current status, physician status, and related details.","recordAnchor":"Shows prompt effort to obtain basic medical information directly. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","public-accountability","safety"]},{"id":"Event-178","sourcePage":62,"dateLabel":"Apr. 1, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 1, 2026 - Father sent Formal Notice of Continued Communication Obstruction Affecting Medical and School Matters to Bedard.","displayTitle":"Apr. 1, 2026 - Father sent Formal Notice of Continued Communication Obstruction Affecting Medical and School Matters to Bedard.","recordAnchor":"Explicit obstruction anchor tied to medical and school information. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-179","sourcePage":62,"dateLabel":"Apr. 2, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 2, 2026 - Father sent Supplemental Record Notice stating that as of the evening of Apr. 1 he had received no meaningful response from Amanda or Bedard's office regarding child's medical status, school absence, or related issues.","displayTitle":"Apr. 2, 2026 - Father sent Supplemental Record Notice stating that as of the evening of Apr. 1 he had received no meaningful response from Amanda or Bedard's office regarding child's medical status, school absence, or related issues.","recordAnchor":"Explicit no-meaningful-response anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-180","sourcePage":62,"dateLabel":"Apr. 5, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 5, 2026 - Father emailed Amanda requesting Easter Sunday time with child. Holiday-contact request anchor.","displayTitle":"Apr. 5, 2026 - Father emailed Amanda requesting Easter Sunday time with child. Holiday-contact request anchor.","recordAnchor":"Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact"]},{"id":"Event-181","sourcePage":62,"dateLabel":"Apr. 6, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 6, 2026 - Father sent Supplemental Formal Notice regarding updated attendance entries, continued nonresponse, and medical-access obstruction; motion-to-enforce / expedited-status-conference lane also opened.","displayTitle":"Apr. 6, 2026 - Father sent Supplemental Formal Notice regarding updated attendance entries, continued nonresponse, and medical-access obstruction; motion-to-enforce / expedited-status-conference lane also opened.","recordAnchor":"Attendance and medical-access issues had escalated into formal enforcement filings. Gmail + April packet","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","court-order","safety"]},{"id":"Event-182","sourcePage":62,"dateLabel":"Apr. 6, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 6, 2026 - Bedard replied that school records could be obtained directly from the school and that child is sometimes slow getting out of the house / to school.","displayTitle":"Apr. 6, 2026 - Bedard replied that school records could be obtained directly from the school and that child is sometimes slow getting out of the house / to school.","recordAnchor":"Dismissive minimization / channel-shifting response anchor. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-183","sourcePage":62,"dateLabel":"Apr. 7, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 7, 2026 - Father sent preservation and pattern emails to Bedard, including the MaineCare / release issue documented since 2016 and longstanding access-control / alienating-conduct materials.","displayTitle":"Apr. 7, 2026 - Father sent preservation and pattern emails to Bedard, including the MaineCare / release issue documented since 2016 and longstanding access-control / alienating-conduct materials.","recordAnchor":"Shows active effort to tie the current implementation failure back to the longer historical pattern. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","records","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-184","sourcePage":63,"dateLabel":"Apr. 8, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 8, 2026 - Bedard forwarded, You can e-file / See filing today.","displayTitle":"Apr. 8, 2026 - Bedard forwarded, You can e-file / See filing today.","recordAnchor":"Pat Bedard. Curt procedural-response anchor during the filing-access lane. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"Event-185","sourcePage":63,"dateLabel":"Apr. 9, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 9, 2026 - Amanda replied on Easter Sunday that child had spent hours at Wentworth-Douglass, later felt better, and wanted to leave; Father replied that child had not clearly declined Easter contact.","displayTitle":"Apr. 9, 2026 - Amanda replied on Easter Sunday that child had spent hours at Wentworth-Douglass, later felt better, and wanted to leave; Father replied that child had not clearly declined Easter contact.","recordAnchor":"Shows a contested holiday-contact lane intertwined with a same-day medical explanation. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","medical","safety"]},{"id":"Event-186","sourcePage":63,"dateLabel":"Apr. 9, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 9, 2026 - Father sent tone / disparagement notice to Bedard and filed emergency Rule 3(d) / expedited materials with the Law Court.","displayTitle":"Apr. 9, 2026 - Father sent tone / disparagement notice to Bedard and filed emergency Rule 3(d) / expedited materials with the Law Court.","recordAnchor":"Marks a simultaneous escalation in the communication lane and the appellate-emergency lane. Gmail + April packet","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-187","sourcePage":63,"dateLabel":"Apr. 10-13, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 10-13, 2026 - Consolidated, supplemental, exhibit-packet, corrected-packet, and second-supplemental-amendment lanes exploded into multiple filings, attachments, and cover sets.","displayTitle":"Apr. 10-13, 2026 - Consolidated, supplemental, exhibit-packet, corrected-packet, and second-supplemental-amendment lanes exploded into multiple filings, attachments, and cover sets.","recordAnchor":"The volume of work required merely to keep the record usable had become extraordinary. Google Drive April packet + uploaded supplemental docs","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-188","sourcePage":63,"dateLabel":"Apr. 11, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 11, 2026 - Father emailed Amanda asking whether child was available for the daily contact ordered by the court. Daily-contact enforcement remained active even at this late stage.","displayTitle":"Apr. 11, 2026 - Father emailed Amanda asking whether child was available for the daily contact ordered by the court. Daily-contact enforcement remained active even at this late stage.","recordAnchor":"Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Parent-child contact implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","court-order"]},{"id":"Event-189","sourcePage":63,"dateLabel":"Apr. 11, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 11, 2026 - Tyler rejection notice returned envelope 204805 and required separate exhibit PDFs, a proposed order attachment, and EFS service-contact compliance.","displayTitle":"Apr. 11, 2026 - Tyler rejection notice returned envelope 204805 and required separate exhibit PDFs, a proposed order attachment, and EFS service-contact compliance.","recordAnchor":"The portal itself had become part of the access-to-justice problem. Tyler rejection notice","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["contact","school","medical","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-190","sourcePage":64,"dateLabel":"Apr. 11, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 11, 2026 - Federal filing submission sent in Stanfill, 2:26-cv-00057-LEW.","displayTitle":"Apr. 11, 2026 - Federal filing submission sent in Stanfill, 2:26-cv-00057-LEW.","recordAnchor":"Anchors the federal-intake lane before the later objection and appeal filings; shows the Stanfill matter was already being actively pushed through federal intake by email. Gmail - Fed Intake / Stanfill","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"2:26-cv-00057-LEW Law Court / appeal; Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal"]},{"id":"Event-191","sourcePage":64,"dateLabel":"Apr. 12, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 12, 2026 - Tyler rejection notice returned envelope 204846 and explicitly noted that pro se litigants were not required to e-file and could bring the documents directly to the courthouse.","displayTitle":"Apr. 12, 2026 - Tyler rejection notice returned envelope 204846 and explicitly noted that pro se litigants were not required to e-file and could bring the documents directly to the courthouse.","recordAnchor":"The filing-access barrier repeated across days, and the system itself suggested in-hand filing as the practical workaround. Tyler rejection notice","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"Event-192","sourcePage":64,"dateLabel":"Apr. 13, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 13, 2026 - Access and Delayed Deprivation letter served by email on Attorney Bedard before later eFile acceptance.","displayTitle":"Apr. 13, 2026 - Access and Delayed Deprivation letter served by email on Attorney Bedard before later eFile acceptance.","recordAnchor":"The later accepted Odyssey filing should be read against the earlier service anchor, showing the document was not newly created on Apr. 27 but had already been sent to opposing counsel while the electronic filing path remained unstable.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"User filing comment / Apr. 27 accepted filing context; verify against sent email if needed. / Medium-High","statusLimitations":"Medium-High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-193","sourcePage":64,"dateLabel":"Apr. 13-14, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 13-14, 2026 - Corrected exhibit packet, access-and-delayed-deprivation packet, criminal companion packet, and top-12 pattern exhibits were assembled.","displayTitle":"Apr. 13-14, 2026 - Corrected exhibit packet, access-and-delayed-deprivation packet, criminal companion packet, and top-12 pattern exhibits were assembled.","recordAnchor":"Father was forced to build a synthetic evidentiary system to make a 15-plus-year record legible because the normal institutional process was not absorbing the pattern fast enough. Google Drive April packet High Generated Apr. 21, 2026. This addendum supplements Master Timeline - All Sources Integrated v6 and adds the recent federal-intake Gmail lane for Pollack (2:26-cv-00211) and Stanfill (2:26-cv-00057-LEW).","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"2:26-cv-00211; 2:26-cv-00057-LEW Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"Legacy source confidence as recorded / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-194","sourcePage":64,"dateLabel":"Apr. 13, 2026, 9:38 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 13, 2026, 9:38 PM - Father emailed Amanda and Bedard regarding daily electronic contact under the Feb. 11 order.","displayTitle":"Apr. 13, 2026, 9:38 PM - Father emailed Amanda and Bedard regarding daily electronic contact under the Feb. 11 order.","recordAnchor":"Shows the electronic-contact issue still was not functioning cleanly two months after the order. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Parent-child contact implementation; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-195","sourcePage":64,"dateLabel":"Apr. 13, 2026, 10:11 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 13, 2026, 10:11 PM - Amanda replied confirming child's number as [private phone redacted] and stating there were no phone restrictions other than while he was driving with the instructor / during those windows. Partial-response anchor: the number was finally confirmed, but the broader daily-contact issue remained unresolved.","displayTitle":"Apr. 13, 2026, 10:11 PM - Amanda replied confirming child's number as [private phone redacted] and stating there were no phone restrictions other than while he was driving with the instructor / during those windows.","recordAnchor":"Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact"]},{"id":"Event-196","sourcePage":65,"dateLabel":"Apr. 13, 2026, 10:19 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 13, 2026, 10:19 PM - Father replied that the issue remained reasonable daily electronic contact, not sporadic or functionally narrowed access.","displayTitle":"Apr. 13, 2026, 10:19 PM - Father replied that the issue remained reasonable daily electronic contact, not sporadic or functionally narrowed access.","recordAnchor":"Preserves the implementation dispute in writing after the partial response. Gmail","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Parent-child contact implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact"]},{"id":"Event-197","sourcePage":65,"dateLabel":"Apr. 16, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Initial new civil action filing emailed in Pollack, 2:26-cv-00211.","displayTitle":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Initial new civil action filing emailed in Pollack, 2:26-cv-00211.","recordAnchor":"Opens the Pollack federal lane with a dated intake anchor rather than a later reconstructed claim. Gmail - Fed Intake / Pollack","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"2:26-cv-00211 Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-198","sourcePage":65,"dateLabel":"Apr. 16, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Fed Intake responded that the complaint was received but that the registration form, civil cover sheet, and IFP materials were still required.","displayTitle":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Fed Intake responded that the complaint was received but that the registration form, civil cover sheet, and IFP materials were still required.","recordAnchor":"Creates a clean deficiency-and-cure sequence showing the case was not ignored; intake identified specific opening requirements. Gmail - Fed Intake / Pollack","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-199","sourcePage":65,"dateLabel":"Apr. 16, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Cure submission sent with the requested civil cover sheet, IFP application, pro se registration, and related opening materials.","displayTitle":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Cure submission sent with the requested civil cover sheet, IFP application, pro se registration, and related opening materials.","recordAnchor":"Shows prompt effort to cure intake deficiencies the same day rather than leaving the Pollack filing incomplete. Gmail - Fed Intake / Pollack","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-200","sourcePage":65,"dateLabel":"Apr. 16, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Fed Intake then advised that the pro se registration required an actual signature, not /s/.","displayTitle":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Fed Intake then advised that the pro se registration required an actual signature, not /s/.","recordAnchor":"This is the strongest concrete intake-deficiency anchor in the Pollack lane: permission to e-file by email turned on a signature-formality issue, not on silence or uncertainty. Gmail - Fed Intake / Pollack","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-201","sourcePage":65,"dateLabel":"Apr. 16, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Acknowledgment back to intake after the actual-signature issue was raised.","displayTitle":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Acknowledgment back to intake after the actual-signature issue was raised.","recordAnchor":"Shows immediate recognition of the defect and continued effort to perfect the filing path. Gmail - Fed Intake / Pollack","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-202","sourcePage":66,"dateLabel":"Apr. 16, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Electronic Filing Registration - Email Confirmation sent by Fed Intake.","displayTitle":"Apr. 16, 2026 - Electronic Filing Registration - Email Confirmation sent by Fed Intake.","recordAnchor":"Confirms receipt of the pro se civil electronic-filing registration and gives the Pollack lane the cleanest intake trail in the recent federal sequence. Gmail - Fed Intake / Pollack","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-203","sourcePage":66,"dateLabel":"Apr. 17, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 17, 2026 - Follow-up asking whether the confirmation message was the 'test' email.","displayTitle":"Apr. 17, 2026 - Follow-up asking whether the confirmation message was the 'test' email.","recordAnchor":"Shows Father continuing to make sure the registration process was functioning correctly rather than assuming the intake lane was complete. Gmail - Fed Intake / Pollack","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-204","sourcePage":66,"dateLabel":"Apr. 20, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 20, 2026 - Objection to Recommended Decision After Preliminary Review sent for filing in Stanfill and copied to the Law Court clerk and Attorney General.","displayTitle":"Apr. 20, 2026 - Objection to Recommended Decision After Preliminary Review sent for filing in Stanfill and copied to the Law Court clerk and Attorney General.","recordAnchor":"Moves the Stanfill federal lane beyond initial filing into active objection practice and ties it to parallel state-awareness recipients. Gmail - Fed Intake / Stanfill","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Law Court / appeal; Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-205","sourcePage":66,"dateLabel":"Apr. 20, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 20, 2026 - Daniel Pierce, LCSW asked whether the Friday appointment could occur at 10:00 AM; Father promptly agreed; Pierce confirmed, [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","displayTitle":"Apr. 20, 2026 - Daniel Pierce, LCSW asked whether the Friday appointment could occur at 10:00 AM; Father promptly agreed; Pierce confirmed, [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","recordAnchor":"Creates a clean provider-confirmed anchor that the counseling/contact appointment was scheduled before the later driver's-education displacement.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","medical","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-206","sourcePage":66,"dateLabel":"Apr. 21, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 21, 2026 - Notice of Appeal sent for filing in Stanfill, 2:26-cv-00057-LEW.","displayTitle":"Apr. 21, 2026 - Notice of Appeal sent for filing in Stanfill, 2:26-cv-00057-LEW.","recordAnchor":"Adds the present federal-appellate escalation anchor: the Stanfill federal lane is no longer only at the objection stage; it now includes a notice-of-appeal filing. Gmail - Fed Intake / Stanfill","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"2:26-cv-00057-LEW Law Court / appeal; Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master Timeline v6/v11/v15 preserved layer","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed legacy timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal"]},{"id":"Event-207","sourcePage":67,"dateLabel":"Apr. 21, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 21, 2026 - Attorney Bedard responded that Ms. Morse is not going to respond to each communication, that she will inform Father when she needs to regarding child, that Father should get information directly from school and medical providers, and that Amanda/Bedard would review compliance materials before in-person contact could proceed.","displayTitle":"Apr. 21, 2026 - Attorney Bedard responded that Ms. Morse is not going to respond to each communication, that she will inform Father when she needs to regarding child, that Father should get information directly from school and…","recordAnchor":"Strong counsel-level implementation-posture anchor: contact, information flow, and compliance review are framed as filtered/discretionary rather than court-directed adult logistics.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Parent-child contact implementation; School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","medical","records","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-208","sourcePage":67,"dateLabel":"Apr. 21, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 21, 2026 - Father replied to Bedard, copied Dan Pierce and Ms. Morse, disputing the interpretation and asking Bedard to identify the specific order language authorizing counsel/client review, suspension of in-person progression, substitution of child's preference as a practical veto, or reduced communication obligations.","displayTitle":"Apr. 21, 2026 - Father replied to Bedard, copied Dan Pierce and Ms. Morse, disputing the interpretation and asking Bedard to identify the specific order language authorizing counsel/client review, suspension of in-person…","recordAnchor":"Preserves that Father timely disputed the implementation posture in writing and did not acquiesce to child-veto framing or unilateral filtering.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]; supplemental_Packet.pdf attached to follow-up. / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-209","sourcePage":67,"dateLabel":"Apr. 21, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 21, 2026 - Trial_Court_Clerk_Status_Letter_April_21_2026.pdf sent to Bedard. Letter asks trial court clerk for administrative clarification of what is docketed, pending, returned, and accepted, specifically referencing Feb. 13-14 notices of appeal, fee-waiver/transcript-audio related materials, and Rule 52(b) filings.","displayTitle":"Apr. 21, 2026 - Trial_Court_Clerk_Status_Letter_April_21_2026.pdf sent to Bedard. Letter asks trial court clerk for administrative clarification of what is docketed, pending, returned, and accepted, specifically referencing Feb.…","recordAnchor":"Strong administrative-process anchor before the Law Court record-completion order.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal","counsel","financial"]},{"id":"Event-210","sourcePage":67,"dateLabel":"Apr. 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 22, 2026 - Briefing schedule issued in Yor-26-118. It states the record became complete on Apr. 22 after original record plus transcript/payment/cancellation/statement-in-lieu/expiration posture. Appellant brief and appendix due May 20; appellee due June 17. Service list again says Justin has not opted into electronic service and must be served paper documents.","displayTitle":"Apr. 22, 2026 - Briefing schedule issued in Yor-26-118. It states the record became complete on Apr. 22 after original record plus transcript/payment/cancellation/statement-in-lieu/expiration posture.","recordAnchor":"Direct record-complete date and deadline; also direct service-list issue.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118 Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-211","sourcePage":67,"dateLabel":"Apr. 23-24, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 23-24, 2026 - The provider-confirmed Friday counseling/contact appointment was displaced by driver's education. Father did not object to driver's education and offered direct weekend time or a prompt make-up session. Ms. Morse stated child was rational and independent, Father could ask him himself, and in-person contact would be [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","displayTitle":"Apr. 23-24, 2026 - Provider-confirmed counseling/contact time displaced; make-up options proposed","recordAnchor":"Shows an already-scheduled contact/counseling opportunity being converted into a child-choice issue rather than adult-supported make-up logistics.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Parent-child contact implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","medical","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-212","sourcePage":68,"dateLabel":"Apr. 24, 2026, 12:03 AM","year":2026,"title":"April 24, 2026, 12:03 a.m. - Email states the order “plainly states” the child is the “sole gatekeeper” and calls scheduling sequence and timing “irrelevant”","displayTitle":"April 24, 2026, 12:03 a.m. - “Sole gatekeeper” position and “irrelevant” scheduling language preserved","recordAnchor":"The 12:03 a.m. email states that the order “plainly states” the child is the “sole gatekeeper” of contact decisions and frequency and states that whether one event was scheduled before another, and the timing of the schedule change, were “irrelevant.”","whyItMatters":"The phrase “sole gatekeeper” does not appear in the order. The email therefore preserves a direct conflict between the written interpretation being used and the order’s actual text.","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Parent-child contact implementation; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread; forwarded to Bedard for position as counsel. / High","statusLimitations":"High for the transmitted email and timestamp. The email proves the position was stated; legal effect remains for the court.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-213","sourcePage":68,"dateLabel":"Apr. 24, 2026, 12:11 AM","year":2026,"title":"April 24, 2026, 12:11 a.m. - Follow-up states: “It is not my interpretation / It is verbatim.”","displayTitle":"April 24, 2026, 12:11 a.m. - “It is not my interpretation / It is verbatim.”","recordAnchor":"Eight minutes after the 12:03 a.m. message, Ms. Morse replied to the disputed “sole gatekeeper” interpretation: “It is not my interpretation / It is verbatim.”","whyItMatters":"This fixes the exact timing and the textual claim that the disputed phrase came directly from the order.","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Parent-child contact implementation; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread: Morse response; Bedard forwarded awareness email. / High","statusLimitations":"High for the transmitted email and timestamp. The order text controls whether the statement was actually verbatim.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-214","sourcePage":68,"dateLabel":"Apr. 24, 2026, 9:33 AM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 24, 2026, 9:33 AM - Record-completion/audio posture motion filed in Yor-26-118, asking Law Court to determine whether record includes transcript, audio, settled statement, or no hearing record; whether District Court ruled on Feb. 18 audio motion; and to include any cancellation notice/OTO correspondence/docket entry.","displayTitle":"Apr. 24, 2026, 9:33 AM - Record-completion/audio posture motion filed in Yor-26-118, asking Law Court to determine whether record includes transcript, audio, settled statement, or no hearing record; whether District Court ruled on…","recordAnchor":"Preserves requested clarification before deadline runs.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118 Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["records","court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-215","sourcePage":68,"dateLabel":"Apr. 24, 2026, 1:54 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 24, 2026, 1:54 PM - Corrected motion filed in Yor-26-118, same core relief: determine/complete record, clarify transcript/audio/statement-in-lieu posture, identify any cancellation notice/OTO correspondence/docket entry, and extend deadline if record incomplete.","displayTitle":"Apr. 24, 2026, 1:54 PM - Corrected motion filed in Yor-26-118, same core relief: determine/complete record, clarify transcript/audio/statement-in-lieu posture, identify any cancellation notice/OTO correspondence/docket entry, and…","recordAnchor":"Clean corrected filing; should be timeline master anchor.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118 Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["records","court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-216","sourcePage":68,"dateLabel":"Apr. 24, 2026, 1:57 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 24, 2026, 1:57 PM - Father emailed Maine Judicial Branch eCourts Help regarding repeated eFileMaine rejection for service contact, attaching four rejection screenshots.","displayTitle":"Apr. 24, 2026, 1:57 PM - Father emailed Maine Judicial Branch eCourts Help regarding repeated eFileMaine rejection for service contact, attaching four rejection screenshots.","recordAnchor":"Private process-help attempt preceded public criticism and further filings; supports good-faith effort to resolve the portal defect without public escalation.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail sent email to [email redacted]. / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","school","medical","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-217","sourcePage":69,"dateLabel":"Apr. 25, 2026, 7:11 AM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 25, 2026, 7:11 AM - Father emailed Ms. Morse and Bedard, copying Dan Pierce, requesting confirmation that the displaced counseling/contact time would be preserved, replaced, or made up; reiterated Dan Pierce's recommendation that individual counseling be made available to child.","displayTitle":"Apr. 25, 2026, 7:11 AM - Father emailed Ms. Morse and Bedard, copying Dan Pierce, requesting confirmation that the displaced counseling/contact time would be preserved, replaced, or made up; reiterated Dan Pierce's recommendation…","recordAnchor":"Shows Father continued to seek a practical child-centered make-up solution and preserved the individual-counseling recommendation in writing.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-218","sourcePage":69,"dateLabel":"Apr. 25, 2026, 5:42 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 25, 2026, 5:42 PM - Ms. Morse responded that whether to have in-person contact is a decision child can make and control on his own; [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] She also asked Father to stop emailing except for emergencies or she would report emails to NBPD as PFA violations.","displayTitle":"Apr. 25, 2026 - In-person contact framed as the child's decision; PFA-report threat preserved","recordAnchor":"Confirms the current adult-implementation problem: in-person contact is framed as child's practical decision, while ordinary child-related communication is chilled by a threatened PFA report.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Parent-child contact implementation; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread; Father forwarded to Bedard and Dan Pierce. / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-219","sourcePage":69,"dateLabel":"Apr. 25, 2026, 7:12 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 25, 2026, 7:12 PM - Father submitted Supplemental Motion for Targeted Implementation Relief through eFileMaine. Tyler envelope 210756 was returned for [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","displayTitle":"Apr. 25, 2026, 7:12 PM - Father submitted Supplemental Motion for Targeted Implementation Relief through eFileMaine. Tyler envelope 210756 was returned for [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","recordAnchor":"Shows the targeted relief packet was attempted before later repeated resubmissions, but was stopped administratively for service-contact configuration rather than substance.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Tyler/eFileMaine rejected filing notification; Gmail [email redacted]. / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-220","sourcePage":69,"dateLabel":"Apr. 27, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 27, 2026 - Father published a public access-to-justice post noting repeated service-contact rejection loops, broken Tyler support link, private support outreach on Apr. 24 and Apr. 27, and the public cost of Maine's Tyler contract.","displayTitle":"Apr. 27, 2026 - Father published a public access-to-justice post noting repeated service-contact rejection loops, broken Tyler support link, private support outreach on Apr. 24 and Apr. 27, and the public cost of Maine's Tyler…","recordAnchor":"Public accountability was raised after private support outreach and repeated portal barriers; post avoided confidential case details and framed issue as system reliability for all court users.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"LinkedIn screenshots / public post record. / High for screenshot content","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","school","medical","efiling","public-accountability","financial"]},{"id":"Event-221","sourcePage":70,"dateLabel":"Apr. 27, 2026, morning","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 27, 2026, morning - Infinite Campus / school portal showed child's attendance updated for Apr. 27, 2026. Entry shown: B1 Lifetime Activities - Late to School - Tardy Unexcused. S2 attendance summary shown: 34 absences, 33 tardies, 2 early releases.","displayTitle":"Apr. 27, 2026, morning - Infinite Campus / school portal showed child's attendance updated for Apr. 27, 2026.","recordAnchor":"Adds a current objective school-stability anchor after attendance and punctuality issues had already been raised; undercuts any framing that attendance concerns were stale or speculative.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Infinite Campus screenshots provided Apr. 27, 2026. / High for screenshot content","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","records","safety"]},{"id":"Event-222","sourcePage":70,"dateLabel":"Apr. 27, 2026, 6:39 AM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 27, 2026, 6:39 AM - After Ms. Morse threatened police/PFA reporting for non-emergency emails, Father sent child a non-escalating direct text: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","displayTitle":"Apr. 27, 2026, 6:39 AM - After Ms. Morse threatened police/PFA reporting for non-emergency emails, Father sent child a non-escalating direct text: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","recordAnchor":"Shows Father attempted a minimal, supportive child-directed communication rather than escalating through Ms. Morse after her threatened reporting posture.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record General timeline / record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Screenshot of text message thread. / High for screenshot content","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["safety"]},{"id":"Event-223","sourcePage":70,"dateLabel":"Apr. 27, 2026, 12:24 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 27, 2026, 12:24 PM - Father submitted an eFileMaine motion filing described as [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] Tyler envelope 210987 was returned for the same service-contact defect: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","displayTitle":"Apr. 27, 2026, 12:24 PM - eFileMaine returned envelope 210987 for the same service-contact defect","recordAnchor":"Documents another attempted filing stopped by the same service-contact rejection loop despite prior private support outreach.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Tyler/eFileMaine rejected filing notification; screenshot and Gmail no-reply notice. / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-224","sourcePage":70,"dateLabel":"Apr. 27, 2026, 12:33 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 27, 2026, 12:33 PM - Father emailed Maine eCourts Help and Tyler support regarding repeated eFile rejections preventing docket clarification.","displayTitle":"Apr. 27, 2026, 12:33 PM - Father emailed Maine eCourts Help and Tyler support regarding repeated eFile rejections preventing docket clarification.","recordAnchor":"Adds a second private support attempt, this time copying Tyler support after the filing system continued rejecting filings.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail sent email to [email redacted] and [email redacted]. / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"Event-225","sourcePage":70,"dateLabel":"Apr. 27, 2026, 12:34 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 27, 2026, 12:34 PM - Father submitted Access_and_Delayed_Deprivation.pdf as a party letter in YORDC-FM-2010-00190. Tyler envelope 210994 was submitted at 12:34 PM EST.","displayTitle":"Apr. 27, 2026, 12:34 PM - Father submitted Access_and_Delayed_Deprivation.pdf as a party letter in YORDC-FM-2010-00190. Tyler envelope 210994 was submitted at 12:34 PM EST.","recordAnchor":"Creates the accepted-entry track for a previously served letter seeking access/docket clarification and preserves the filing path after repeated rejection issues.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Tyler/eFileMaine submitted filing notification and later entry confirmation. / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"Event-226","sourcePage":71,"dateLabel":"Apr. 27, 2026, approx. 2:45 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 27, 2026, approx. 2:45 PM - Clicking the [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] support link in the rejection notice led to a browser error at eg2113prss.egain.net: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] / [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","displayTitle":"Apr. 27, 2026 - Support link embedded in Tyler rejection notice failed to resolve","recordAnchor":"Shows the official support path embedded in the rejection notice itself failed to resolve, strengthening the access-to-justice / portal-barrier lane.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Screenshot of failed support link page. / High for screenshot content","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-227","sourcePage":71,"dateLabel":"Apr. 27, 2026, 3:27 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 27, 2026, 3:27 PM - The Clerk's Office accepted Tyler envelope 210994 and entered Access_and_Delayed_Deprivation.pdf into Odyssey as [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] in YORDC-FM-2010-00190. Filing submitted 12:34 PM; entered 3:27 PM; lead file page count 3.","displayTitle":"Apr. 27, 2026, 3:27 PM - Clerk accepted envelope 210994 and entered the filing in Odyssey","recordAnchor":"Confirms at least one previously served/documented filing finally reached the trial-court docket after repeated eFileMaine rejection/service-contact issues.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Tyler/eFileMaine Confirmation of Entry email; screenshot; envelope 210994. / High","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-228","sourcePage":71,"dateLabel":"Apr. 27-28, 2026 4:21 PM submission / Apr. 28 rejection","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 27-28, 2026 4:21 PM submission / Apr. 28 rejection - Targeted implementation-relief motion packet returned again by Tyler/eFileMaine for service-contact and caption/designation defects.","displayTitle":"Apr. 27-28, 2026 4:21 PM submission / Apr. 28 rejection - Targeted implementation-relief motion packet returned again by Tyler/eFileMaine for service-contact and caption/designation defects.","recordAnchor":"Preserves repeated administrative barrier to child-impact implementation relief and relation-back issue.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["contact","court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-229","sourcePage":71,"dateLabel":"Apr. 28, 2026 9:31 AM received / 9:33 AM forwarded","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 28, 2026 9:31 AM received / 9:33 AM forwarded - ReachMyTeach/school attendance message stated child was absent from school; father forwarded the message to Attorney Bedard.","displayTitle":"Apr. 28, 2026 9:31 AM received / 9:33 AM forwarded - ReachMyTeach/school attendance message stated child was absent from school; father forwarded the message to Attorney Bedard.","recordAnchor":"Confirms attendance concern was immediate and ongoing, while counsel was used as communication channel after PFA-report threats over ordinary child-related email.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","school","counsel","public-accountability","safety"]},{"id":"Event-230","sourcePage":71,"dateLabel":"Apr. 29, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 29, 2026 - Law Court entered order denying record-completion motion, described in Justin's same-day reply as stating: March 2 denial of transcript/audio at state expense; March 19 OTO cancellation letter for nonpayment; record complete Apr. 22.","displayTitle":"Apr. 29, 2026 - Law Court entered order denying record-completion motion, described in Justin's same-day reply as stating: March 2 denial of transcript/audio at state expense; March 19 OTO cancellation letter for nonpayment; record…","recordAnchor":"Adverse order rests on documents Justin still needs to see/verify.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","court-order","appeal","financial"]},{"id":"Event-231","sourcePage":72,"dateLabel":"Apr. 29, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 29, 2026 - Law Court no-transcript notice filed in Yor-26-118 Appellant filed Notice Regarding No Transcript Available and Preservation of Review on Existing Record, copying Bedard for service.","displayTitle":"Apr. 29, 2026 - Law Court no-transcript notice filed in Yor-26-118 Appellant filed Notice Regarding No Transcript Available and Preservation of Review on Existing Record, copying Bedard for service.","recordAnchor":"Preserves appeal posture after record-access/transcript barrier and frames briefing around existing record. Gmail/Law Court filing email + attached PDF High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118 Transcript / audio / record access; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-232","sourcePage":72,"dateLabel":"Apr. 29, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 29, 2026 - Rule 5 service of Supplemental Addendum and Master Timeline v12M Bedard served with supplemental addendum, renewed status-conference request, judicial-notice request, and Master Timeline v12M as conduct-pattern/source-navigation exhibit.","displayTitle":"Apr. 29, 2026 - Rule 5 service of Supplemental Addendum and Master Timeline v12M Bedard served with supplemental addendum, renewed status-conference request, judicial-notice request, and Master Timeline v12M as…","recordAnchor":"Shows counsel was given consolidated dated anchors before later filings and was placed on notice about incomplete factual framing. Gmail Rule 5 service + attachments High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-233","sourcePage":72,"dateLabel":"Apr. 29-30, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 29-30, 2026 - Trial-court eFile envelope 212684 submitted and entered Supplemental Notice/Addendum/Renewed Status Conference/Judicial Notice packet submitted Apr. 29 at 9:40 PM and entered Apr. 30 at 9:51 AM.","displayTitle":"Apr. 29-30, 2026 - Trial-court eFile envelope 212684 submitted and entered Supplemental Notice/Addendum/Renewed Status Conference/Judicial Notice packet submitted Apr. 29 at 9:40 PM and entered Apr. 30 at 9:51 AM.","recordAnchor":"Confirms the post-April 29 trial-court implementation/status-conference lane was actually docketed after Tyler submission. Tyler submitted/entry notices High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"Event-234","sourcePage":72,"dateLabel":"Apr. 29, 2026, 3:09 PM","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 29, 2026, 3:09 PM - Justin replied to Law Court clerk, cc both Bedard emails, requesting the March 2 order, March 19 OTO cancellation letter, proof/method of service, docket entry reflecting cancellation, record-complete docket entry/notice, and materials showing statement-in-lieu posture. The reply also notes the service list says Justin has not opted into electronic service and must be served paper documents.","displayTitle":"Apr. 29, 2026, 3:09 PM - Justin replied to Law Court clerk, cc both Bedard emails, requesting the March 2 order, March 19 OTO cancellation letter, proof/method of service, docket entry reflecting cancellation, record-complete…","recordAnchor":"Immediate preservation of defect/notice issue after denial.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Apr. 29 transcript/audio/record-completion Gmail review addendum","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed addendum entry","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["records","appeal","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-235","sourcePage":72,"dateLabel":"Apr. 30, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 30, 2026 - Law Court provided record/transcript materials but would not mail attachments Clerk Pollack provided March 2 order, March 19 transcript-cancellation letter, docket sheet, and briefing schedule by email, stated April 29 order was mailed, and stated attached documents would not be mailed.","displayTitle":"Apr. 30, 2026 - Law Court provided record/transcript materials but would not mail attachments Clerk Pollack provided March 2 order, March 19 transcript-cancellation letter, docket sheet, and briefing schedule by email, stated April…","recordAnchor":"Important service/access anchor because the briefing schedule had said Justin had not opted into electronic service and required paper service. Law Court email + four PDF attachments High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Transcript / audio / record access; Law Court / appeal; Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-236","sourcePage":73,"dateLabel":"Apr. 30, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Apr. 30, 2026 - Trial-court record request letter filed through Tyler Envelope 212893 submitted and entered as Letter - From Party - Filed; lead file Trial_Court_Clerk_Record_Request _YORDC-FM-2010-00190_2026-04-30.pdf.","displayTitle":"Apr. 30, 2026 - Trial-court record request letter filed through Tyler Envelope 212893 submitted and entered as Letter - From Party - Filed; lead file Trial_Court_Clerk_Record_Request _YORDC-FM-2010-00190_2026-04-30.pdf.","recordAnchor":"Shows parallel trial-court record-access effort while Law Court record posture remained disputed. Tyler submitted/service/entry notices High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-237","sourcePage":73,"dateLabel":"2026-05-01","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-01 - Yor-26-[private address redacted] appendix/brief readiness packet and source bank generated","displayTitle":"2026-05-01 - Yor-26-[private address redacted] appendix/brief readiness packet and source bank generated","recordAnchor":"ZIP batch contains a May 1 appendix/brief readiness packet, appendix control index, final appendix shell/current working copy, Law Court brief working draft, record-request follow-up packet, and working source bank index. The source bank identifies Law Court docket, briefing schedule, transcript-cancellation letter, February 11 order, February 14/20 image-only PDFs, audio-in-lieu motion, ODT conversions, compliance email PDFs, and master timeline materials.","whyItMatters":"Shows a structured pre-filing record assembly and source-control effort before the May 11 brief/appendix submission noted in v11.","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118; YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-2024-[private address redacted] brief/appendix preparation / source bank","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Law_Court_Prep_PDFs_Yor-26-118_20260501.zip; Appendix_Control_Index_Yor-26-118_20260501.pdf; Final_Appendix_Shell_Current_Working_Copy_Yor-26-118_20260501.pdf; Working_Source_Bank_Index_Yor-26-118_20260501.pdf","statusLimitations":"High / ADD / evidence-management timeline","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-238","sourcePage":73,"dateLabel":"2026-05-01","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-01 - Law Court brief working draft/scaffold framed requested relief around findings, record access, and implementation logistics","displayTitle":"2026-05-01 - Law Court brief working draft/scaffold framed requested relief around findings, record access, and implementation logistics","recordAnchor":"May 1 working draft states brief should be verified against final docket sheets and appendix pagination; draft relief included vacatur/remand for findings and correct legal standards, and record/audio/statement-in-lieu process to replace unavailable/cancelled transcript, plus implementation-related relief.","whyItMatters":"Preserves the appellate theory and record-development stage before final brief filing, while distinguishing draft from filed copy.","caseIssue":"Yor-26-[private address redacted] brief drafting / appellate relief","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Law_Court_Brief_Working_Draft_Yor-26-118_20260501.pdf; Law_Court_Prep_Combined_Generated_Packets_Yor-26-118_20260501.pdf","statusLimitations":"High for draft content / ADD / evidence-management timeline","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["records","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-239","sourcePage":73,"dateLabel":"May 1, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 1, 2026 - Counseling-session litigation-exposure concern preserved Justin memorialized child statement in counseling that Justin was still sending [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]; Bedard replied he confirmed with Amanda that child had not seen or been to","displayTitle":"May 1, 2026 - Counseling-session litigation-exposure concern preserved Justin memorialized child statement in counseling that Justin was still sending [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]; Bedard…","recordAnchor":"ld anything. Direct child-exposure/litigation-framing anchor inside reunification counseling; Bedard response is preserved in same thread. Gmail thread with Bedard and Dan Pierce High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-240","sourcePage":73,"dateLabel":"May 1, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 1, 2026 - Motion to amend/supplement contempt timeline/service submitted Envelope 213831 submitted for Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Pending Motion for Contempt; served through Tyler. Starts the Tyler-return sequence that later required se","displayTitle":"May 1, 2026 - Motion to amend/supplement contempt timeline/service submitted Envelope 213831 submitted for Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Pending Motion for Contempt; served through Tyler.","recordAnchor":"parate exhibit PDFs and resubmission language. Tyler submitted/service notices High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-241","sourcePage":74,"dateLabel":"May 4, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 4, 2026 - Tyler rejected envelope 213831 Tyler returned the May 1 filing for multiple documents in one PDF, required separate exhibit PDFs, and gave MRECS 35(E) relation-back resubmission language. Access-to-justice/portal-friction anchor: filing was","displayTitle":"May 4, 2026 - Tyler rejected envelope 213831 Tyler returned the May 1 filing for multiple documents in one PDF, required separate exhibit PDFs, and gave MRECS 35(E) relation-back resubmission language.","recordAnchor":"substantively served but procedurally returned with strict resubmission requirements. Tyler rejection notices High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; School / attendance / academic support","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-242","sourcePage":74,"dateLabel":"May 4-5, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 4-5, 2026 - Corrected/resubmitted envelope 215603 submitted and entered Corrected filing submitted May 4 at 9:38 PM and entered May 5 at 11:04 AM as Motion to Modify/Amend, lead file 0 1_LEAD_Motion_Amend_Supplement_Contempt_Timelin e_Service_20260501.pdf.","displayTitle":"May 4-5, 2026 - Corrected/resubmitted envelope 215603 submitted and entered Corrected filing submitted May 4 at 9:38 PM and entered May 5 at 11:04 AM as Motion to Modify/Amend, lead file 0…","recordAnchor":"Shows prompt correction after Tyler rejection and confirms docket entry after resubmission. Tyler submitted/entry notices High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-243","sourcePage":74,"dateLabel":"May 5, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 5, 2026 - May 5 attendance documentation sent to Bedard Justin documented MSAD portal entry showing child marked Tardy Unexcused for B1 Spanish I / Late to School; screenshot preserved inline.","displayTitle":"May 5, 2026 - May 5 attendance documentation sent to Bedard Justin documented MSAD portal entry showing child marked Tardy Unexcused for B1 Spanish I / Late to School; screenshot preserved inline.","recordAnchor":"Adds current attendance anchor tied to implementation, contempt/enforcement, and school-stability issues. Gmail to Bedard + inline screenshot High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-244","sourcePage":74,"dateLabel":"May 5-8, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 5-8, 2026 - MSAD #60 Annual Update and school-access lane MSAD Annual Update notice received; Justin asked Bedard for Morse to confirm shared parental rights and direct school communications/portal/records/Annual Update access. School forwarded request internally for assistance.","displayTitle":"May 5-8, 2026 - MSAD #60 Annual Update and school-access lane MSAD Annual Update notice received; Justin asked Bedard for Morse to confirm shared parental rights and direct school communications/portal/records/Annual Update access.","recordAnchor":"Shows parent/access issue is concrete and current, not abstract; school and counsel were both put on notice. Gmail/MSAD threads + inline portal screenshot High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","school","medical","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-245","sourcePage":74,"dateLabel":"May 6-8, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 6-8, 2026 - Four consecutive school-day tardy/unexcused entries documented Justin documented portal entries for May 5, 6, 7, and 8 and noted commute is approx. 2.4 miles; requested client position by close of business. Updates chronic attendance lane w","displayTitle":"May 6-8, 2026 - Four consecutive school-day tardy/unexcused entries documented Justin documented portal entries for May 5, 6, 7, and 8 and noted commute is approx. 2.4 miles; requested client position by close of business.","recordAnchor":"ith a tight current cluster immediately before renewed status-conference filing. Gmail to Bedard + inline screenshots High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-246","sourcePage":75,"dateLabel":"2026-05-08","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-08 - Board of Overseers referral of GCF #25-524 dismissal review carried forward from v12","displayTitle":"2026-05-08 - Board of Overseers referral of GCF #25-524 dismissal review carried forward from v12","recordAnchor":"Master Timeline v12 records that Board Clerk Melinda F. Whelan notified Justin Tahai that his request for review of Bar Counsel's dismissal of GCF #25-524 concerning Patrick S. Bedard had been referred to a public non-attorney member of the Grievance Commission; the letter copied Bedard.","whyItMatters":"Keeps the May 13 v12 add-only professional-conduct oversight entry in the June 6 continuity set before appending v12M and this v13 batch.","caseIssue":"GCF-25-524 Professional conduct / Board review","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Master_Timeline_All_Sources_Integrated_v12_May_13_2026_ADD_ONLY.pdf (retrieved search result)","statusLimitations":"High as timeline carry-forward; source exhibit still needed / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-247","sourcePage":75,"dateLabel":"May 8, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 8, 2026 - Counseling late-arrival and early-departure issue Justin documented that child was late to counseling and left early because Morse was allegedly taking him to a concert; Justin appeared on time and requested confirmation future sessions be","displayTitle":"May 8, 2026 - Counseling late-arrival and early-departure issue Justin documented that child was late to counseling and left early because Morse was allegedly taking him to a concert; Justin appeared on time and requested…","recordAnchor":"full-length. Therapy implementation anchor: court-ordered reunification time was shortened by adult logistics/elective activity. Gmail to Bedard; May 8 supplement attachment High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-248","sourcePage":75,"dateLabel":"May 8, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 8, 2026 - Supplemental implementation/ status-conference motion filed Supplement requested prompt status conference and interim order requiring on-time arrival, full-session availability unless provider ends early, no elective activities overriding therapy, and same-day written notice of lateness/early departure.","displayTitle":"May 8, 2026 - Supplemental implementation/ status-conference motion filed Supplement requested prompt status conference and interim order requiring on-time arrival, full-session availability unless provider ends early, no elective…","recordAnchor":"Converts May 8 counseling problem into formal, narrow requested relief. Attachment 01_Supplement_Impleme ntation_Issues_Status_Conference.pd f High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","medical","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-249","sourcePage":75,"dateLabel":"May 8-11, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 8-11, 2026 - Tyler envelope 217926 submitted, served, and entered Envelope 217926 submitted May 8 at 5:03 PM and entered May 11 at 9:28 AM; clerk comment accepted/adjusted Letter to Court as lead document but reminded about Rule 34(A) multiple-case filing duties.","displayTitle":"May 8-11, 2026 - Tyler envelope 217926 submitted, served, and entered Envelope 217926 submitted May 8 at 5:03 PM and entered May 11 at 9:28 AM; clerk comment accepted/adjusted Letter to Court as lead document but reminded about…","recordAnchor":"Confirms the May 8 implementation supplement reached Odyssey and preserves clerk comment about eFile procedure. Tyler submitted/service/entry notices High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-250","sourcePage":75,"dateLabel":"May 8-11, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 8-11, 2026 - Law Court record-material request renewed and refused as duplicative Justin renewed request for record materials after York County Clerk said files were at Law Court; Clerk Pollack responded May 11 that request was identical to Apr. 29/Apr.","displayTitle":"May 8-11, 2026 - Law Court record-material request renewed and refused as duplicative Justin renewed request for record materials after York County Clerk said files were at Law Court; Clerk Pollack responded May 11 that request was…","recordAnchor":"30, no further documents would be provided by email, and Justin could examine the file in person/pay for copies. Record-access/service-posture anchor immediately before brief/appendix filing. Law Court email thread High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Law Court / appeal; Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-251","sourcePage":76,"dateLabel":"May 9, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 9, 2026 - Renewed emergency Rule 3(d) motion filed with Law Court Justin filed emergency motion for leave to permit limited trial-court enforcement/implementation proceedings during appeal; motion sought prompt status conference and interim enforcement/implementation orders for live parent-child contact/reunification logistics.","displayTitle":"May 9, 2026 - Renewed emergency Rule 3(d) motion filed with Law Court Justin filed emergency motion for leave to permit limited trial-court enforcement/implementation proceedings during appeal; motion sought prompt status…","recordAnchor":"Shows continued need for limited trial-court action while appeal pending and directly links implementation harm to appellate emergency posture. Gmail filing email + attached motion High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Parent-child contact implementation; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","court-order","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-252","sourcePage":76,"dateLabel":"May 10, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 10, 2026 - Rule 5 service of updated notice re pending Rule 3(d) motion Bedard and Morse served with updated notice filed in recommendation.","displayTitle":"May 10, 2026 - Rule 5 service of updated notice re pending Rule 3(d) motion Bedard and Morse served with updated notice filed in recommendation.","recordAnchor":"Adds individual-counseling request as child-focused relief separate from reunification contact work. Gmail Rule 5 service + attachment High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","court-order","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-253","sourcePage":76,"dateLabel":"May 10, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 10, 2026 - Criminal matter context packet sent to Attorney Ramirez Justin sent May 12 hearing packet and full-thread appendices regarding April 13 electronic contact, April 23-24 counseling/gatekeeping, and April 25 PFA-threat/preservation context.","displayTitle":"May 10, 2026 - Criminal matter context packet sent to Attorney Ramirez Justin sent May 12 hearing packet and full-thread appendices regarding April 13 electronic contact, April 23-24 counseling/gatekeeping, and April 25…","recordAnchor":"Shows cross-case disclosure/context preservation without asking criminal counsel to litigate family matter. Gmail to Ramirez + attached appendices High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Parent-child contact implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-254","sourcePage":76,"dateLabel":"May 11, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 11, 2026 - Appellant brief and appendix filed in Yor-26-118 Justin emailed Appellant's Brief and Appendix to Law Court, copying both Bedard emails for service; Law Court auto-response confirmed receipt/ticket 28746. Major appellate deadline anchor; co","displayTitle":"May 11, 2026 - Appellant brief and appendix filed in Yor-26-118 Justin emailed Appellant's Brief and Appendix to Law Court, copying both Bedard emails for service; Law Court auto-response confirmed receipt/ticket 28746.","recordAnchor":"nfirms brief/appendix were submitted before May 20 due date. Gmail filing email + Law Court auto-receipt High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118 Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-255","sourcePage":76,"dateLabel":"May 12, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 12, 2026 - Algebra/school-support request to Morse and Bedard Justin documented Algebra I progress concerns and requested child be encouraged/permitted to contact him directly for math/school help, including phone, text, video, and portal-related coo","displayTitle":"May 12, 2026 - Algebra/school-support request to Morse and Bedard Justin documented Algebra I progress concerns and requested child be encouraged/permitted to contact him directly for math/school help, including phone, text, video…","recordAnchor":"rdination. Connects academic needs, parent-child communication, and blocked parental support. Gmail to Morse cc Bedard + inline school screenshot High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","school","medical","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-256","sourcePage":77,"dateLabel":"May 12, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 12, 2026 - Attendance totals and repeated tardies documented to Morse/Bedard Justin documented portal totals: S1 showing 44 absences and 24 tardies across listed courses; S2 showing 36 absences, 38 tardies, and 2 early releases; recent daily entries showed repeated Tardy Unexcused marks.","displayTitle":"May 12, 2026 - Attendance totals and repeated tardies documented to Morse/Bedard Justin documented portal totals: S1 showing 44 absences and 24 tardies across listed courses; S2 showing 36 absences, 38 tardies, and 2 early…","recordAnchor":"Strong current quantitative attendance anchor; ties chronic attendance to grades, missing work, Math Lab/KT, and direct academic support. Gmail to Morse/Bedard + two screenshots High","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical","records","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-257","sourcePage":77,"dateLabel":"May 12, 2026","year":2026,"title":"May 12, 2026 - Continued implementation-logistics notice with video attached Justin wrote Bedard, cc Dan Pierce, stating unresolved/inconsistent logistics remain around daily electronic contact, timely coordination, records/access, and school/medical/coun","displayTitle":"May 12, 2026 - Continued implementation-logistics notice with video attached Justin wrote Bedard, cc Dan Pierce, stating unresolved/inconsistent logistics remain around daily electronic contact, timely coordination, records/access…","recordAnchor":"seling communication; video attached for documentation/context. Current implementation notice framed around avoiding ambiguity and reducing unnecessary motion practice. Gmail to Bedard cc Pierce + video attachment metadata High Addendum page 3","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Parent-child contact implementation; School / attendance / academic support; Medical / records / insurance / DHHS; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"v11 May 12 Gmail/post-Apr.28 addendum and attachment review","statusLimitations":"High unless otherwise noted / Confirmed add-only timeline entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","medical","court-order","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-258","sourcePage":77,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 Evening","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 Evening - FM-218 corrective resubmission prepared","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 Evening - FM-218 corrective resubmission prepared","recordAnchor":"Following Tyler rejection, FM-218 was prepared as lead form with see-attached fields and attached answer addendum, checking child-best-interest, parental-rights, and other grounds, estimating 90 minutes, and prepared for print/sign/scan/resubmission.","whyItMatters":"Shows same-day correction effort after procedural rejection.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190 FM-218 / resubmission / implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"Medium-High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"Event-259","sourcePage":77,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 Evening","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 Evening - Emergency motion packet updated with Exhibit B","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 Evening - Emergency motion packet updated with Exhibit B","recordAnchor":"Law Court May 14 order was added as Exhibit B after existing Exhibit A in emergency clarification / limited remand packet.","whyItMatters":"Preserves packet-control step and incorporation of same-day order.","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118 Emergency motion packet / exhibit update","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"Medium-High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-260","sourcePage":77,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 12:06 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 12:06 ET - Law Court / trial court implementation demand email","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 12:06 ET - Law Court / trial court implementation demand email","recordAnchor":"Tahai emailed the Law Court / trial court clerk, copying Patrick Bedard, Amanda Morse, and Daniel Pierce, demanding immediate action on implementation burden and parent-child contact. The email identified overlapping Law Court, trial-court, federal, school/provider, eFiling, record-preservation, and counseling/contact burdens.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Counseling / therapy / contact logistics; Parent-child contact implementation; School / attendance / academic support; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal; Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","medical","appeal","efiling","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-261","sourcePage":78,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 12:06 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 12:06 ET - Law Court / trial court implementation demand email","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 12:06 ET - Law Court / trial court implementation demand email","recordAnchor":"Email to Law Court/trial-court clerk, copying Bedard, Morse, and Pierce, demanded immediate action on implementation burden and parent-child contact and identified overlapping Law Court, trial-court, federal, school/provider, eFiling, record-preservation, and counseling/contact burdens.","whyItMatters":"Preserves acute May 14 implementation burden across multiple forums.","caseIssue":"Law Court; YORDC-FM-2010-00190; Yor-26-118 Implementation burden / parent-child contact","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","medical","appeal","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-262","sourcePage":78,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 12:27 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 12:27 ET - Trial-court Tyler submission, envelope 220237","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 12:27 ET - Trial-court Tyler submission, envelope 220237","recordAnchor":"Demand for Immediate Action on Implementation Burden and Parent-Child Contact submitted through Tyler/eFileMaine in YORDC-FM-2010-00190 as Other Filing / Other Document.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190 Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; Parent-child contact implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","appeal","efiling","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-263","sourcePage":78,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 12:27 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 12:27 ET - Trial-court Tyler submission envelope 220237","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 12:27 ET - Trial-court Tyler submission envelope 220237","recordAnchor":"Demand for Immediate Action on Implementation Burden and Parent-Child Contact submitted through Tyler/eFileMaine in","whyItMatters":"Tracks accepted/attempted trial-court route for implementation demand.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190 Tyler/eFileMaine / implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["contact","efiling","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-264","sourcePage":78,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 14:06 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 14:06 ET - Tyler/Odyssey entry, envelope 220237","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 14:06 ET - Tyler/Odyssey entry, envelope 220237","recordAnchor":"Tyler confirmed the demand filing was received by the clerk and entered into Odyssey. Lead file: Demand for Immediate Action on Implementation Burden and Parent-Child Contact.pdf, 2 pages.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; Parent-child contact implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["contact","appeal","efiling","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-265","sourcePage":78,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 14:06 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 14:06 ET - Tyler/Odyssey entry of envelope 220237","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 14:06 ET - Tyler/Odyssey entry of envelope 220237","recordAnchor":"Tyler confirmed the demand filing was received by the clerk and entered into Odyssey; lead file was Demand for Immediate Action on Implementation Burden and Parent-Child Contact.pdf, 2 pages.","whyItMatters":"Confirms docket entry of one May 14 implementation filing.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190 Tyler/Odyssey / docket entry","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["contact","efiling","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-266","sourcePage":79,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 14:15 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 14:15 ET - Law Court supplemental Rule 3(d) filing emailed","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 14:15 ET - Law Court supplemental Rule 3(d) filing emailed","recordAnchor":"Tahai emailed Supplemental Motion for Expedited Action on Pending Rule 3(d) Relief and Notice of Continuing Implementation Harm in Yor-26-118, serving Bedard and Morse. Attachments included Exhibits A-G: Pierce scheduling/payment materials, demand email, Law Court receipt, and Tyler envelope 220237 documentation.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118 Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal","efiling","counsel","financial"]},{"id":"Event-267","sourcePage":79,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 14:15 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 14:15 ET - Law Court supplemental Rule 3(d) filing emailed","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 14:15 ET - Law Court supplemental Rule 3(d) filing emailed","recordAnchor":"Supplemental Motion for Expedited Action on Pending Rule 3(d) Relief and Notice of Continuing Implementation Harm emailed in Yor-26-118, serving Bedard and Morse, with Exhibits A-G including Pierce scheduling/payment materials, demand email, Law Court receipt, and Tyler envelope 220237 documentation.","whyItMatters":"Carries implementation harm into pending Law Court Rule 3(d) posture.","caseIssue":"Yor-26-[private address redacted] Rule 3(d) / implementation harm","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal","efiling","counsel","financial"]},{"id":"Event-268","sourcePage":79,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 14:18 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 14:18 ET - Trial-court motion submitted through Tyler, envelope 220333","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 14:18 ET - Trial-court motion submitted through Tyler, envelope 220333","recordAnchor":"Tahai submitted Motion for Interim Implementation Order and Expedited Status Conference in YORDC-FM-2010-00190. Filing type used: Motion - Motion for Expedited Hearing - Filed. Lead file: 02_Trial_Court_Motion_Interim_Implementation_Order_Expedited_Status_Conference_2026-05-14.pdf.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190 Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-269","sourcePage":79,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 14:18 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 14:18 ET - Trial-court interim implementation motion submitted as envelope 220333","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 14:18 ET - Trial-court interim implementation motion submitted as envelope 220333","recordAnchor":"Motion for Interim Implementation Order and Expedited Status Conference submitted through Tyler in YORDC-FM-2010-00190, filing type Motion - Motion for Expedited Hearing - Filed, lead file 02_Trial_Court_Motion_Interim_Implementation_Order_Expedited_Status_Conference_2026-05-14.pdf.","whyItMatters":"Creates the filing that later triggered the FM-218 rejection and relation-back issue.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190 Tyler/eFileMaine / expedited hearing / implementation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-270","sourcePage":79,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 14:59 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 14:59 ET - Law Court clerk response","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 14:59 ET - Law Court clerk response","recordAnchor":"Law Court Clerk Matthew Pollack responded that the Court could not take action on the implementation-demand email itself, noted a motion appeared to repeat the email, and stated the motion would be docketed and presented to the Court as usual.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Law Court / appeal; Federal / institutional preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-271","sourcePage":80,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 14:59 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 14:59 ET - Law Court clerk response to implementation-demand email","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 14:59 ET - Law Court clerk response to implementation-demand email","recordAnchor":"Clerk Matthew Pollack responded that the Court could not act on the implementation-demand email itself, noted a motion appeared to repeat the email, and said the motion would be docketed and presented as usual.","whyItMatters":"Clarifies channel separation between email demand and motion docketing.","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118 / Law Court Clerk response / docketing procedure","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-272","sourcePage":80,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 15:10 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 15:10 ET - Tyler rejection, envelope 220333","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 15:10 ET - Tyler rejection, envelope 220333","recordAnchor":"Tyler/eFileMaine rejected the trial-court Motion for Interim Implementation Order and Expedited Status Conference. Rejection reason: applicable court form required under M.R.E.C.S. 31(C); Motion for Expedited Hearing FM-218 must be used. Rejection notice also preserved M.R.E.C.S. 35(E) relation-back instructions requiring resubmission within four business days with precise comments.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-273","sourcePage":80,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 15:10 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 15:10 ET - Tyler rejected envelope 220333 requiring FM-218 form and preserving relation-back instructions","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 15:10 ET - Tyler rejected envelope 220333 requiring FM-218 form and preserving relation-back instructions","recordAnchor":"Tyler/eFileMaine rejected the trial-court motion because an applicable court form was required under M.R.E.C.S. 31(C); the FM-218 Motion for Expedited Hearing form was required. Rejection preserved M.R.E.C.S. 35(E) relation-back instructions for resubmission within four business days with precise comments.","whyItMatters":"Important access-to-justice and relation-back anchor for the implementation filing.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190 Tyler rejection / FM-218 / relation-back","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-274","sourcePage":80,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 15:21 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 15:21 ET - Law Court May 14 order served","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 15:21 ET - Law Court May 14 order served","recordAnchor":"Law Court served Order in Yor-26-118, attaching 26-118 Order.pdf. Email warned that the order may be time-sensitive and may require action.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-[private address redacted] / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-275","sourcePage":80,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 15:21 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 15:21 ET - Law Court May 14 order served","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 15:21 ET - Law Court May 14 order served","recordAnchor":"Law Court served an order in Yor-26-118 attaching 26-118 Order.pdf; email warned that the order may be time-sensitive and may require action.","whyItMatters":"Creates time-sensitive Law Court order-service anchor.","caseIssue":"Yor-26-[private address redacted] order / service","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-276","sourcePage":81,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 17:34 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 17:34 ET - Acknowledgment email to Law Court","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 17:34 ET - Acknowledgment email to Law Court","recordAnchor":"Tahai acknowledged receipt of the May [private address redacted] order and confirmed understanding of the hard-copy appendix deadline and appendix-strike posture, copying Bedard.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-277","sourcePage":81,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 17:34 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 17:34 ET - Acknowledgment email to Law Court","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 17:34 ET - Acknowledgment email to Law Court","recordAnchor":"Justin acknowledged receipt of the May [private address redacted] order and confirmed understanding of hard-copy appendix deadline and appendix-strike posture, copying Bedard.","whyItMatters":"Preserves timely acknowledgment and understanding of appendix posture.","caseIssue":"Yor-26-[private address redacted] appendix / acknowledgment","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-278","sourcePage":81,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 19:07 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 19:07 ET - Emergency Motion for Clarification / Limited Remand emailed","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 19:07 ET - Emergency Motion for Clarification / Limited Remand emailed","recordAnchor":"Tahai emailed the Law Court an Emergency Motion for Clarification, Limited Remand, or Other Appropriate Relief Regarding the Trial Court's May 11, 2026 Jurisdiction Order, copying Bedard and Morse. The motion included Exhibit A consisting of the April 16, 2026 emergency motion and May 11, 2026 jurisdiction order.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Professional conduct / Bedard-Bobrow; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal","efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-279","sourcePage":81,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 19:07 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 19:07 ET - Emergency motion for clarification / limited remand emailed","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 19:07 ET - Emergency motion for clarification / limited remand emailed","recordAnchor":"Emergency Motion for Clarification, Limited Remand, or Other Appropriate Relief Regarding the Trial Court's May 11, 2026 Jurisdiction Order emailed to the Law Court, copying Bedard and Morse, with Exhibit A consisting of April 16 emergency motion and May 11 jurisdiction order.","whyItMatters":"Preserves attempt to clarify jurisdiction/remand path while implementation harm continues.","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118; YORDC-FM-2010-00190 Limited remand / jurisdiction / emergency relief","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-280","sourcePage":81,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 19:08 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 19:08 ET - Law Court automated receipt","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 19:08 ET - Law Court automated receipt","recordAnchor":"Law Court auto-receipt confirmed receipt of the Emergency Motion for Clarification / Limited Remand email. 2026-05-14 evening - FM-218 corrective resubmission prepared. Following Tyler rejection, Tahai prepared FM-218 as lead form with [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] fields and an attached answer addendum, checked child-best-interest, parental-rights, and other grounds, estimated 90 minutes, and prepared to print/sign/scan for resubmission. 2026-05-14 evening - Emergency motion packet updated with Exhibit B. The Law Court May 14 order was added as Exhibit B after the existing Exhibit A in the emergency clarification / limited remand packet.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record Tyler/eFileMaine / docket access; Law Court / appeal","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE v12M May 14 No-Loss Supplement","statusLimitations":"High / Confirmed no-loss supplement entry","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-281","sourcePage":82,"dateLabel":"2026-05-14 19:08 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-05-14 19:08 ET - Law Court automated receipt for emergency clarification / limited remand email","displayTitle":"2026-05-14 19:08 ET - Law Court automated receipt for emergency clarification / limited remand email","recordAnchor":"Law Court auto-receipt confirmed receipt of the emergency motion email.","whyItMatters":"Confirms transmission/receipt timing.","caseIssue":"Yor-26-[private address redacted] receipt / service","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"MASTER-TIMELINE-v12M---MAY-14,-2026-NO-LOSS-SUPPLEMENT.txt","statusLimitations":"High / CARRY-FORWARD FROM v12M","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-282","sourcePage":82,"dateLabel":"2026-06-06 16:02-18:45 ET approx.","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-06 16:02-18:45 ET approx. - Local legal-copy export audit completed with conservative canonical PDF/page map","displayTitle":"2026-06-06 16:02-18:45 ET approx. - Local legal-copy export audit completed with conservative canonical PDF/page map","recordAnchor":"Codex/local run inventoried 4,155 source files and 3,406 source PDFs, counted 24,259 readable source PDF pages, canonicalized to 664 source PDFs and 4,252 readable pages, exported 709 PDFs/4,252 pages, with 191 split/identified documents and 518 needs-review PDFs. Exact duplicate report showed 9,129 records / 638 groups; near duplicate report 222 records / 4 groups; version/resubmission groups 3 records / 1 group. Readable canonical page-map validation passed, but overall reconciliation stayed conservative FAIL because two original PDFs were unreadable; source modified NO.","whyItMatters":"Adds evidence-management provenance for the local PDF corpus and clarifies the difference between source inventory, canonical set, and readable page map.","caseIssue":"All local legal-copy source buckets Evidence processing / dedupe / validation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Pasted text.txt; Pasted text (2).txt","statusLimitations":"High for pasted Codex report; source reports should be retained / ADD / evidence-management timeline","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-283","sourcePage":82,"dateLabel":"2026-06-06 18:45 ET approx.","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-06 18:45 ET approx. - Docsplit pass2 created no-grab-bag fallback set from local repo PDFs","displayTitle":"2026-06-06 18:45 ET approx. - Docsplit pass2 created no-grab-bag fallback set from local repo PDFs","recordAnchor":"Follow-up docsplit pass2 output path E:\\legal_copy_export\\run_20260606_160237_docsplit_pass2_20260606_184526 reported 3,093 final PDFs, 4,252 pages, 191 confident pass1 documents carried forward, 518 former needs-review PDFs processed, 2,902 former needs-review pages split, 2,564 Windows local OCR pages, 338 native-text pages, validation PASS, and source folder modified NO.","whyItMatters":"Clarifies that PASS2 is the zero-grab-bag fallback set for review/upload and not the original source repository.","caseIssue":"All local legal-copy PDF source buckets PDF splitting / OCR / SharePoint review output","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Pasted text.txt; Pasted text (2).txt","statusLimitations":"High for pasted Codex report / ADD / evidence-management timeline","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-284","sourcePage":82,"dateLabel":"2026-06-06 18:59 ET approx.","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-06 18:59 ET approx. - Docsplit pass3 created grouped document-candidate set","displayTitle":"2026-06-06 18:59 ET approx. - Docsplit pass3 created grouped document-candidate set","recordAnchor":"Grouped candidate pass path E:\\legal_copy_export\\run_20260606_160237_docsplit_pass2_20260606_184526_grouped_pass3_20260606_185953 reported 2,908 candidate document PDFs, 4,252 pages, 191 confident pass1 documents carried forward, 136 OCR grouped multi-page continuations, 2,581 OCR atomic single-page documents, validation PASS.","whyItMatters":"Clarifies that PASS3 is the more document-shaped candidate set, while PASS2 remains the no-risk one-page fallback for uncertain scans.","caseIssue":"All local legal-copy PDF source buckets PDF grouping / document candidate review","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Pasted text.txt; Pasted text (2).txt","statusLimitations":"High for pasted Codex report / ADD / evidence-management timeline","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-285","sourcePage":82,"dateLabel":"2026-06-06 19:20 ET approx.","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-06 19:20 ET approx. - OneDrive/SharePoint upload showed PASS2 atomic PDF output syncing, not whole evidence repository","displayTitle":"2026-06-06 19:20 ET approx. - OneDrive/SharePoint upload showed PASS2 atomic PDF output syncing, not whole evidence repository","recordAnchor":"Screenshot shows OneDrive - TAHAI Web Services uploading 2,533 files / 121.8 MB of 733.1 MB, with PASS2_ATOMIC PDFs being uploaded to 04_atomic_page_splits_review. This confirms SharePoint review access is receiving derivative split PDFs, while non-PDF evidence and Gmail-only PDFs remain separate intake lanes.","whyItMatters":"Prevents mislabeling the SharePoint upload as the complete source repo and preserves the need for non-PDF/Gmail-native batch review.","caseIssue":"Evidence management / SharePoint review SharePoint upload / derivative PDF output scope","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Screenshot 2026-06-06 192057.png","statusLimitations":"High for screenshot content / ADD / evidence-management timeline","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-286","sourcePage":83,"dateLabel":"2026-06-06 21:51-22:52 ET approx.","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-06 21:51-22:52 ET approx. - Full-repository all-file-types review completed","displayTitle":"2026-06-06 21:51-22:52 ET approx. - Full-repository all-file-types review completed","recordAnchor":"The full local evidence pass completed under E:\\legal_copy_export\\run_20260606_195347_FULL_REPO_ALL_FILE_TYPES_REVIEW. The completion report states 4,619 source files reviewed; 15,171 expanded files including archive children and attachments; 10,378 PDFs; 1,479 images; 719 emails; 18 mail containers; 965 native documents; 98 text documents; 133 spreadsheets; 145 archives; 0 audio/video; 2,069 canonical evidence items after dedupe; 1,577 exact duplicate groups; 2,212 near-duplicate groups; 2,931 timeline candidates; 745 timeline entries added; 2,174 timeline candidates still needing review; 21 unreadable/problem files; validation PASS; source modified NO.","whyItMatters":"This is the first all-file-types corpus baseline. It expands the evidence universe beyond the PDF split output and preserves the distinction between full source inventory, expanded archive/attachment inventory, dedupe/canonical mapping, and timeline candidate review.","caseIssue":"All legal lanes / cross-case Full corpus / evidence management / forensic preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Pasted full-repo completion report; run_20260606_195347_FULL_REPO_ALL_FILE_TYPES_REVIEW; FINAL_SUMMARY_FOR_USER.md; python_validation_report.json","statusLimitations":"High for completion-log facts / ADD / evidence-management timeline","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal"]},{"id":"Event-287","sourcePage":83,"dateLabel":"2026-06-07 04:34 ET approx.","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-07 04:34 ET approx. - GAL Evidence Assistant / Local RAG build completed","displayTitle":"2026-06-07 04:34 ET approx. - GAL Evidence Assistant / Local RAG build completed","recordAnchor":"Local GAL Evidence Assistant build completed at E:\\legal_copy_export\\run_20260607_043433_GAL_EVIDENCE_ASSISTANT_LOCAL_RAG. Reported artifacts include start_gal_evidence_assistant.bat, static portal index.html, SQLite database gal_evidence_assistant.sqlite, 15,171 indexed evidence items, 745 timeline events, 15 packets, local LLM status extractive_only, validation PASS, and source modified NO.","whyItMatters":"Makes the indexed evidence searchable and reviewable for GAL/SENTINEL workflows without handing over a raw folder dump. It also marks the point where the evidence universe became a local citation/retrieval system rather than only an archive.","caseIssue":"All legal lanes / GAL / SENTINEL GAL Evidence Assistant / local RAG / source-cited review","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Pasted GAL Evidence Assistant completion report; run_20260607_043433_GAL_EVIDENCE_ASSISTANT_LOCAL_RAG","statusLimitations":"High for completion-log facts / ADD / evidence-management timeline","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical"]},{"id":"Event-288","sourcePage":83,"dateLabel":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx.","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx. - Legal-matter-only print count and filing universe pass completed","displayTitle":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx. - Legal-matter-only print count and filing universe pass completed","recordAnchor":"Pass 737 completed under E:\\legal_copy_export\\run_20260607_224013_LEGAL_MATTER_ONLY_PRINT_COUNT_AND_FILING_UNIVERSE. Reported legal-matter conservative print-equivalent pages: 108,080; realistic estimate: 108,795 to 110,615; literal artifact print pages: 163,671; legal-matter emails: 9,062; threads: 2,592; attachments: 4,481; PDFs/pages: 13,011 / 93,816; images/screenshots: 3,006; native docs/text/spreadsheets: 2,196; excluded nonlegal emails: 30,303; validation PASS; old DB modified NO; source modified NO.","whyItMatters":"Converts the larger full corpus into a court/GAL/federal-relevant subset and gives a defensible print-equivalent baseline without bloating the court record with unrelated personal mail or duplicate artifacts.","caseIssue":"All legal lanes / cross-case Legal-matter-only corpus / print count / relevance narrowing","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"User-provided Pass 737 completion log; run_20260607_224013_LEGAL_MATTER_ONLY_PRINT_COUNT_AND_FILING_UNIVERSE","statusLimitations":"High for completion-log facts / ADD / corpus-narrowing timeline","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-289","sourcePage":83,"dateLabel":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx.","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx. - Every-filing universe baseline generated","displayTitle":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx. - Every-filing universe baseline generated","recordAnchor":"Pass 737 reported 24,904 every-filing universe records. The phrase is intentionally broader than separate docketed filings; it includes filings, filing artifacts, service emails, receipts, rejection notices, entry notices, attachment crosswalks, duplicates, generated review records, and related filing-index records.","whyItMatters":"Creates a process-integrity index for filing/service/docket access. It supports later review of whether filing/service/rejection/entry records show procedural friction, eFiling barriers, or record-access problems.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-2024-01285; Yor-26-46; Yor-26-118; GCF-25-524; federal lanes Every-filing universe / service and notice / docket access","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"User-provided Pass 737 completion log; every-filing universe pass output","statusLimitations":"High for completion-log fact; Medium-High for scope definition pending source CSV review / ADD / filing-universe timeline","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"Event-290","sourcePage":84,"dateLabel":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx.","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx. - Legal-matter entity and issue-lane hit baselines generated","displayTitle":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx. - Legal-matter entity and issue-lane hit baselines generated","recordAnchor":"Pass 737 reported Bedard/Bobrow hits: 2,349; Amanda Ramirez hits: 1,043; GAL Anderson hits: 237; Amanda Morse hits: 1,578; school/attendance hits: 3,366; counseling/provider hits: 3,581; clerk/court/Tyler hits: 725.","whyItMatters":"Provides target counts for legal lanes that can become packets, GAL questions, federal record preservation, professional-responsibility review, and issue-specific filings.","caseIssue":"All legal lanes / cross-case Entity and issue-lane indexing / GAL packet preparation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"User-provided Pass 737 completion log; legal-matter-only hit reports","statusLimitations":"High for completion-log counts; row-level validation pending actual hit CSVs / ADD / index baseline timeline","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["therapy","school","medical","efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-291","sourcePage":84,"dateLabel":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx.","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx. - Legal-matter-only packets built and SENTINEL/GAL refreshed locally","displayTitle":"2026-06-07 22:43 ET approx. - Legal-matter-only packets built and SENTINEL/GAL refreshed locally","recordAnchor":"Pass 737 reported 13 legal-lane packets built and SENTINEL/GAL refreshed YES. The local refresh is a local-folder output, not a cloud push.","whyItMatters":"Marks the local evidence assistant as aligned to the narrower legal-matter-only corpus and enables targeted packets rather than raw-repository disclosure.","caseIssue":"All legal lanes / GAL / SENTINEL Packet builder / local evidence assistant refresh","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"User-provided Pass 737 completion log; SENTINEL/GAL legal-matter refresh summary","statusLimitations":"High for completion-log fact / ADD / evidence-assistant timeline","sourceType":"Timeline synthesis / source navigation","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-292","sourcePage":84,"dateLabel":"2026-06-08 Dated filing","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - Supplemental Notice prepared for trial-court record preservation","displayTitle":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - Supplemental Notice prepared for trial-court record preservation","recordAnchor":"Supplemental Notice Regarding Full-Corpus and Legal-Matter-Only Evidence Reports, Process-Integrity Concerns, Request for Record Preservation, and Trial-Court / Federal-Record Relevance was prepared as a no-placeholder Tyler-friendly filing dated June 8, 2026. It states the filing is for record-preservation, source-navigation, GAL-investigation, trial-court implementation, appellate-record, access-to-courts, and federal-record-preservation purposes.","whyItMatters":"Moves the corpus structure from internal evidence management into a proposed trial-court record-preservation notice without asking the court to print or review the entire corpus at once.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-2024-01285 Record preservation / corpus filing / federal-record preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Supplemental_Notice_Full_Corpus_Legal_Matter_Report_2026-06-08_NO_PLACEHOLDERS.txt; no-placeholder Tyler PDF","statusLimitations":"High for prepared document / ADD / filing-preparation timeline","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["appeal","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-293","sourcePage":84,"dateLabel":"2026-06-08 Dated filing","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - Supplemental Notice incorporates full-corpus and legal-matter-only counts","displayTitle":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - Supplemental Notice incorporates full-corpus and legal-matter-only counts","recordAnchor":"The June 8 Supplemental Notice carries forward the full-corpus print-equivalent estimates of 184,928 conservative pages and 263,790 literal print-every-artifact pages, and the legal-matter-only results including 108,080 conservative pages, 108,795 to 110,615 realistic estimate, 163,671 literal artifact pages, 9,062 legal-matter emails, 2,592 threads, 4,481 attachments, 13,011 PDFs, 93,816 PDF pages, 3,006 images/screenshots, 2,196 native/text/spreadsheet records, and 24,904 every-filing universe records.","whyItMatters":"Preserves the scale/relevance distinction: full corpus proves scale; legal-matter-only corpus proves court/GAL/federal relevance; every-filing universe proves process/service/docket impact.","caseIssue":"All legal lanes / cross-case Corpus counts / print-equivalent / filing universe","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Supplemental Notice no-placeholder text; Pass 737 completion log; full-repo completion report","statusLimitations":"High for stated figures / ADD / record-preservation timeline","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"Event-294","sourcePage":85,"dateLabel":"2026-06-08 Dated filing","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - Process-integrity and systems-ethics framework added to the record","displayTitle":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - Process-integrity and systems-ethics framework added to the record","recordAnchor":"The June 8 Supplemental Notice frames the issue through an IT/cybersecurity process-integrity lens: trust, access control, auditability, information asymmetry, procedural ambiguity, delay, nonresponse, and fragmentation are described as systems issues with real-world consequences in a family matter.","whyItMatters":"Creates a court-safe framework for later federal, appellate, disciplinary, and institutional review by translating frustration into auditability, source-traceability, burden-shifting, and process-integrity terminology.","caseIssue":"All legal lanes / federal lanes Process integrity / systems ethics / federal-record theory","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Supplemental Notice no-placeholder text, sections V-IX","statusLimitations":"High for document content / ADD / theory-preservation timeline","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["appeal"]},{"id":"Event-295","sourcePage":85,"dateLabel":"2026-06-08 Dated filing","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - Supplemental Notice requests targeted review paths instead of bulk paper filing","displayTitle":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - Supplemental Notice requests targeted review paths instead of bulk paper filing","recordAnchor":"The Supplemental Notice asks the court to treat the reports as indexes and preservation tools, not as a request to print or submit every underlying record at once. It requests consideration of targeted subsets including parent-child contact implementation, counseling/therapy logistics, school/attendance, medical/dental/therapy/insurance/MaineCare/DHHS access, transcript/audio/record access, Tyler/eFileMaine filing and service, GAL/historical witness materials, post-February 11 implementation communications, post-April 29 and post-May 14 current-delta materials, every-filing universe/service-notice index, professional-responsibility/process-integrity lanes, and federal-record preservation lanes.","whyItMatters":"Preserves a practical route for court or GAL review of 108,000+ legal-matter print-equivalent pages without overwhelming the docket.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-2024-01285; cross-case GAL review / case management / targeted packets","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Supplemental Notice no-placeholder text, Requested Action section","statusLimitations":"High for document content / ADD / requested-action timeline","sourceType":"Procedural system record","tags":["contact","therapy","school","medical","records","appeal","efiling","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"Event-296","sourcePage":85,"dateLabel":"2026-06-08 Dated filing","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - USB/practical review-copy route preserved subject to court direction","displayTitle":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - USB/practical review-copy route preserved subject to court direction","recordAnchor":"The Supplemental Notice requests that practical review copies or source-navigation materials be allowed by court-directed method, including USB or other media, if a conference, GAL review, clerk direction, or other review procedure is scheduled.","whyItMatters":"Preserves a non-paper way to review the corpus while avoiding unsolicited external media acceptance. It supports later GAL/court review logistics.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-2024-01285; GAL lane Practical review copy / USB / source navigation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Supplemental Notice no-placeholder text, Requested Action paragraph K","statusLimitations":"High for document content / ADD / review-logistics timeline","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-297","sourcePage":85,"dateLabel":"2026-06-08 Dated filing","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - Institutional courtesy-copy notice scoped as notice only","displayTitle":"2026-06-08 Dated filing - Institutional courtesy-copy notice scoped as notice only","recordAnchor":"The Supplemental Notice states courtesy copies may be provided to the Office of Governor Janet T. Mills, the Maine Attorney General, Chief Justice Valerie Stanfill / Maine Supreme Judicial Court, the Maine Senate / Senate President and Secretary's Office, and other appropriate forums. It states no ex parte relief, intervention, adjudication, supervision, or action is requested from courtesy recipients, and that any requested relief is reserved for later proper forums.","whyItMatters":"Puts institutional-notice posture in the record while avoiding an improper request for interference in pending proceedings.","caseIssue":"All legal lanes / federal and institutional notice lanes Courtesy copies / institutional notice / federal-lane preservation","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Supplemental Notice no-placeholder text, Courtesy-Copy Distribution sections","statusLimitations":"High for document content / ADD / institutional-notice timeline","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"Event-298","sourcePage":85,"dateLabel":"2026-06-08 Dated service certificate","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-08 Dated service certificate - Supplemental Notice certificate of service lists Bedard and Amanda Morse","displayTitle":"2026-06-08 Dated service certificate - Supplemental Notice certificate of service lists Bedard and Amanda Morse","recordAnchor":"The certificate of service in the June 8 no-placeholder Supplemental Notice lists Patrick S. Bedard, Esq., Bedard & Bobrow, P.C., [email redacted], and Amanda Morse, [email redacted], and states service was made by email and/or eFileMaine/Odyssey service as applicable.","whyItMatters":"Preserves the service posture for the trial-court notice and confirms Amanda Morse's email address was included in the certificate text.","caseIssue":"YORDC-FM-2010-00190; BIDDC-PA-2024-01285 Certificate of service / notice to parties","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Supplemental Notice no-placeholder text and PDF, Certificate of Service","statusLimitations":"High for document content / ADD / service-certificate timeline","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-300","sourcePage":88,"dateLabel":"Jun. 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 22, 2026 - Meeting with Principal Dufort at school.","displayTitle":"Jun. 22, 2026 - Meeting with Principal Dufort at school.","recordAnchor":"Father met with Principal Dufort regarding child's school records, attendance, tardies, discipline, school-record access, and support/stability concerns. The meeting became the source for the follow-on Exhibit A documentation email and supplemental filing lane.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"June 22 Exhibit A email; school-record images; Father documentation. Confidence / limitations High as same-day preserved documentation; school notes are not separately included in this packet.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","records"]},{"id":"Event-301","sourcePage":88,"dateLabel":"Jun. 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 22, 2026 - Report-card summary confirms 18.5 absences and 68 tardies.","displayTitle":"Jun. 22, 2026 - Report-card summary confirms 18.5 absences and 68 tardies.","recordAnchor":"The Noble report-card summary showed S1: 8.5 absences and 24 tardies; S2: 10 absences and 44 tardies; total: 18.5 absences and 68 tardies. This moves the attendance lane from concern/complaint to objective school-record totals.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Report-card photo; June 22 Exhibit A email; June 22 Supplemental Notice. Confidence / limitations High for visible totals; grade/reporting definitions should be read with school records.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-302","sourcePage":88,"dateLabel":"Jun. 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 22, 2026 - School report-card mailing block lists [redacted] for parent/guardian.","displayTitle":"Jun. 22, 2026 - School report-card mailing block lists [redacted] for parent/guardian.","recordAnchor":"The report-card / school-record packet displayed [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] at [redacted], North Berwick, ME 03906. Father states this is not his address and appears associated with Ms. Morse's parents. This creates a direct school-record / parent-notice routing issue.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Report-card address image; June 22 Exhibit A email; June 22 Supplemental Notice. Confidence / limitations High for visible address; school-origin/address-update history requires school/provider confirmation.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","medical"]},{"id":"Event-303","sourcePage":88,"dateLabel":"Jun. 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 22, 2026 - Discipline/tardy link documented.","displayTitle":"Jun. 22, 2026 - Discipline/tardy link documented.","recordAnchor":"Father documented that the in-school suspension at the end of the prior school year, which he addressed by email while at reunification therapy to avoid upsetting child, was related to accumulated tardies. Father also documented that the only detentions he was aware of this school year were for accumulated tardies.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"June 22 Exhibit A email; Principal Dufort meeting as father-documented source. Confidence / limitations Medium-High; direct school discipline records should be preserved if available.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","school"]},{"id":"Event-304","sourcePage":88,"dateLabel":"Jun. 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 22, 2026 - June 9 no-call / Gram pickup entry preserved.","displayTitle":"Jun. 22, 2026 - June 9 no-call / Gram pickup entry preserved.","recordAnchor":"The Student Period Attendance Detail reflected a June 9, 2026 [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] entry with comment [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] Father documented his understanding that Cynthia Morse picked child up and that Ms. Morse called the school to excuse only after Father emailed the school and Ms. Morse.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Student Period Attendance Detail image; June 22 Exhibit A email; June 22 Supplemental Notice. Confidence / limitations High for visible school comment; post-email sequence should be confirmed by school/email records if contested.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-305","sourcePage":88,"dateLabel":"Jun. 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 22, 2026 - child text response after father-school inquiry.","displayTitle":"Jun. 22, 2026 - child text response after father-school inquiry.","recordAnchor":"After Father sent a supportive text stating that he spoke with Principal Dufort, understood the discipline issues were tied to tardies, believed those were not child's fault, and loved him, child responded with hostile messages including [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained], [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained], [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained], and [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] Father responded without escalation, including supportive statements that he loved and believed in child.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Text-message screenshot 3969.jpg; June 22 Exhibit A email; June 22 Supplemental Notice. Confidence / limitations High for screenshot content; causal interpretation remains a court/GAL issue.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school"]},{"id":"Event-306","sourcePage":89,"dateLabel":"Jun. 22, 2026, 12:16 PM","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 22, 2026, 12:16 PM - Consolidated Exhibit A documentation email sent.","displayTitle":"Jun. 22, 2026, 12:16 PM - Consolidated Exhibit A documentation email sent.","recordAnchor":"Father sent [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] to Patrick Bedard, Daniel Pierce, and Amanda Morse. The email consolidated attendance/tardy totals, discipline/tardy link, 2.4-mile logistics context, June 9 pickup/no-call entry, child text response, incorrect [redacted] mailing block, and requests for direct school access and non-police escalation of ordinary parent-school communications.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Gmail - Supplemental Documentation - Attendance, School Records, Parent Access, and Alienating Conduct Concerns(1).PDF. Confidence / limitations High; native email headers may further strengthen exhibit use.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","counsel"]},{"id":"Event-307","sourcePage":89,"dateLabel":"Jun. 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 22, 2026 - Supplemental Notice prepared and signed for filing with Exhibit A.","displayTitle":"Jun. 22, 2026 - Supplemental Notice prepared and signed for filing with Exhibit A.","recordAnchor":"Father prepared a signed Supplemental Notice regarding school attendance, school-record access, parent-child implementation, and alienating-conduct concerns, using the June 22 consolidated email as Exhibit A. The revised notice adds that child was born in 2010, is now listed in ninth grade, and that more than fifteen years later Father is still having to correct basic parental-access, records-access, and information-flow issues.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"00_Supplemental_Notice_School_Attendance_Records_Access_20260622_REVISED.pdf. Confidence / limitations High for prepared PDF; docket acceptance still requires Tyler/Odyssey confirmation.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","school","records","efiling"]},{"id":"Event-308","sourcePage":89,"dateLabel":"Jun. 22, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 22, 2026 - Long-running parental-access pattern reframed with ninth-grade school-record issue.","displayTitle":"Jun. 22, 2026 - Long-running parental-access pattern reframed with ninth-grade school-record issue.","recordAnchor":"The June 2026 school-address and parent-access problem is carried forward as present-day evidence of the same access/interference lane preserved since child's early childhood: child was born in 2010; he is now listed in ninth grade; and the record still shows Father correcting basic records-access, parent-contact, and information-flow problems fifteen-plus years later.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / family-law record; school / records access / parent-child implementation.","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"June 22 Supplemental Notice paragraph 12; v16 legacy entries regarding 2011 shared records access, 2016 records-access disputes, and 2019/2020 information-control notes. Confidence / limitations Medium-High as synthesis / issue-lane inference; underlying exhibits control.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Filing / party assertion","tags":["contact","school","records"]},{"id":"Event-309","sourcePage":89,"dateLabel":"Jun. 23, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 23, 2026 - Correct Law Court Order on Pending Motions in Yor-26-118 entered/received.","displayTitle":"Jun. 23, 2026 - Correct Law Court Order on Pending Motions in Yor-26-118 entered/received.","recordAnchor":"The Supreme Judicial Court sitting as the Law Court issued an Order on Pending Motions in Yor-26-118. The order states that Father filed a June 8 motion to be relieved of the requirement to file ten printed copies of his reply brief, but then filed the required copies; that Father filed a June 9 Emergency Supplemental Notice and Request for Immediate Limited Remand, Clarification, or Other Child-Protective Action; and that the Court views the remand/request filings as repetitive after prior instructions/orders.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118; Law Court / appeal / limited remand / filing restrictions.","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Correct source: 26-118 Order.pdf, two-page image-only Law Court order, dated June 23, 2026, received June 23, 2026. Confidence / limitations High for visible order text; image-only order should be OCRed/transcribed for searchable source use.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["court-order","appeal","public-accountability"]},{"id":"Event-310","sourcePage":89,"dateLabel":"Jun. 23, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 23, 2026 - Law Court dismisses printed-copy waiver as moot and denies other relief.","displayTitle":"Jun. 23, 2026 - Law Court dismisses printed-copy waiver as moot and denies other relief.","recordAnchor":"The order provides: (1) the motion to waive the requirement of printed reply briefs is dismissed as moot; (2) any other relief requested in any filing or email to date is denied; and (3) if Father files any further motion or other document, other than a motion to reconsider the final decision disposing of the appeal, the Clerk may docket and file the motion or document without presenting it to the Court for consideration.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Yor-26-118; Law Court / appeal / filing restrictions.","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"Correct source: 26-118 Order.pdf, page 2. Confidence / limitations High for visible order text; this entry replaces the incorrect v16A current-order anchor.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"Event-311","sourcePage":90,"dateLabel":"Jun. 23, 2026","year":2026,"title":"Jun. 23, 2026 - Updated issue map after corrected order.","displayTitle":"Jun. 23, 2026 - Updated issue map after corrected order.","recordAnchor":"The June 23 order creates a new appellate-process constraint while the June 22 school evidence continues to support the trial-court enforcement/implementation and record-access lanes. Future timeline and filing strategy should separate trial-court enforcement/record-access filings from Law Court filings in Yor-26-118 unless the filing is a permitted motion to reconsider the final merits decision.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"Cross-case / Law Court / trial-court enforcement / school records.","issueLane":"","sourceSupport":"This v16B corrected addendum; June 22 Exhibit A email; correct June 23 26-118 Order.pdf. Confidence / limitations Synthesis entry; procedural strategy should be checked against current rules and docket posture.","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"V17-001","sourcePage":91,"dateLabel":"2026-06-23 14:26 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-23 14:26 ET - Federal supplemental access-to-justice / child-impact packet sent to MaineECFIntake, cc Maine Attorney General.","displayTitle":"2026-06-23 14:26 ET - Federal supplemental access-to-justice / child-impact packet sent to MaineECFIntake, cc Maine Attorney General.","recordAnchor":"Email asked the federal clerk to docket or route the supplemental packet in 2:26-cv-00057-LEW and 2:26-cv-00211-LEW. It framed the issue as continuing state-level failure to provide timely, meaningful, enforceable relief for parent-child contact, school access, educational stability, direct parental information flow, transcript/audio access, and practical order implementation.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Federal preservation / access-to-courts / child-impact delay","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread 19ef5b7e65dec3b3; message 19ef5bc3fbb68b74; attachments included v16B, Feb. 16 compliance chain, interim implementation motion, audio-in-lieu motion, Law Court expedition motion, and record/audio addendum. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","school","records","court-order","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"V17-002","sourcePage":91,"dateLabel":"2026-06-23 14:29 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-23 14:29 ET - Federal packet forwarded to Bedard and Morse for notice, awareness, and record preservation.","displayTitle":"2026-06-23 14:29 ET - Federal packet forwarded to Bedard and Morse for notice, awareness, and record preservation.","recordAnchor":"Forward stated the packet was not for argument or permission and preserved notice of parent-child contact implementation, school-record access, attendance/punctuality, transcript/audio barriers, eFiling barriers, and continuing child-impact harm caused by delay and failed implementation.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Notice to opposing counsel / preservation","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19ef5bebf9eb8331. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","records","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"V17-003","sourcePage":91,"dateLabel":"2026-06-23 20:20 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-23 20:20 ET - Email to Daniel Pierce, cc Bedard, regarding individual therapy availability and child carrying adult conflict.","displayTitle":"2026-06-23 20:20 ET - Email to Daniel Pierce, cc Bedard, regarding individual therapy availability and child carrying adult conflict.","recordAnchor":"Justin asked whether Ms. Morse had responded regarding individual therapy, whether referral/scheduling was pending, and whether anything was needed from him. Email preserved concern that child was carrying adult conflict, adult blame narratives, and litigation-related emotional burden.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Individual therapy / adult-litigation exposure / provider lane","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19ef6ff896069710. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","medical","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"V17-004","sourcePage":91,"dateLabel":"2026-06-23 22:54 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-23 22:54 ET - Law Court / CJC preservation packet sent to Law Court clerk addresses, public officials, Board, Bedard, and media/public accountability recipients.","displayTitle":"2026-06-23 22:54 ET - Law Court / CJC preservation packet sent to Law Court clerk addresses, public officials, Board, Bedard, and media/public accountability recipients.","recordAnchor":"Email requested docketing/routing or clear written rejection and preserved concern that the district judge sat on pending child-impact filings for months; after Law Court confirmed trial court could act in the usual course, the trial-court action was a one-sentence recusal order rather than scheduling or implementation relief. Email also states the trial-court clerk had confirmed no scheduling order had issued the prior week and that no later order had been received.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Law Court / judicial-conduct / trial-court inaction / public accountability","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19ef78d34e08cd17. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","efiling","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V17-005","sourcePage":91,"dateLabel":"2026-06-24 02:09 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-24 02:09 ET - Email to Bedard and Board, cc Dan Pierce and Morse: Individual Counseling for child and Continuing Child-Impact Implementation Harm.","displayTitle":"2026-06-24 02:09 ET - Email to Bedard and Board, cc Dan Pierce and Morse: Individual Counseling for child and Continuing Child-Impact Implementation Harm.","recordAnchor":"Directly asked for Ms. Morse position on individual counseling. States Pierce recommended individual counseling months earlier; after approximately four months of delayed implementation, first appointment appeared only at the last minute before March 2025 status conference; compares to Tara Pullen-era delay nearly seven years earlier during another parent-child deprivation period. Also asks for provider name, appointment date, attendance, future appointments, parental access to provider information, and agreement not to expose child to adult litigation discussions/materials/blame narratives.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Individual counseling / repeated deprivation pattern / adult litigation exposure","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19ef83fc8d86a9b1. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","medical","counsel"]},{"id":"V17-006","sourcePage":92,"dateLabel":"2026-06-24 17:22 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-24 17:22 ET - Rule 5 / Julie Howard status-presentment letter sent to Bedard and Morse, cc Dan Pierce.","displayTitle":"2026-06-24 17:22 ET - Rule 5 / Julie Howard status-presentment letter sent to Bedard and Morse, cc Dan Pierce.","recordAnchor":"Email text gave notice and included PubMed reference link. Attachment filename indicates Letter_to_Julie_Howard_Status_Presentment_UPDATED_20260624.pdf.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Rule 5 / status-presentment / preservation","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19efb8313201c694; attachment metadata. Confidence/status: Medium-High; attachment content not extracted in this pass","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"V17-007","sourcePage":92,"dateLabel":"2026-06-24 17:26 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-24 17:26 ET - Follow-up Rule 5 email with updated attachment to Bedard and Morse, cc Dan Pierce.","displayTitle":"2026-06-24 17:26 ET - Follow-up Rule 5 email with updated attachment to Bedard and Morse, cc Dan Pierce.","recordAnchor":"Second message in same thread attached attnMsJulieHoward.pdf and preserved additional notice metadata.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Rule 5 / status-presentment / preservation","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19efb87701aa09e9; attachment metadata. Confidence/status: Medium-High; attachment content not extracted in this pass","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"V17-008","sourcePage":92,"dateLabel":"2026-06-24 15:40-18:55 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-24 15:40-18:55 ET - Dan Pierce appointment reminder and scheduling adjustment for Friday, June 26.","displayTitle":"2026-06-24 15:40-18:55 ET - Dan Pierce appointment reminder and scheduling adjustment for Friday, June 26.","recordAnchor":"SimplePractice reminder first showed June 26 at 3:30 PM. Justin forwarded appointment reminder to Morse and Bedard at 3:42 PM and asked Dan to confirm time at 6:40 PM. Dan replied at 6:55 PM that he had looked at Amanda message and that 11 on Friday would work.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Reunification therapy scheduling / adult logistics","sourceSupport":"Thread 19efb25bc8c8db5f; messages 19efb25bc8c8db5f, 19efb283f274d0a9, 19efbca544ca79b8, 19efbd838c43aa78. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"V17-009","sourcePage":92,"dateLabel":"2026-06-25 09:04 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-25 09:04 ET - Dan Pierce scheduling confirmation forwarded to Morse and Bedard.","displayTitle":"2026-06-25 09:04 ET - Dan Pierce scheduling confirmation forwarded to Morse and Bedard.","recordAnchor":"Forward preserved Dan Pierce statement that he had reviewed Amanda message and 11 Friday would work, after the automated appointment reminder initially showed 3:30 PM.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Reunification therapy scheduling / notice to opposing party/counsel","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19efee1b315b09a3. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","counsel","financial"]},{"id":"V17-010","sourcePage":92,"dateLabel":"2026-06-24 17:30-17:32 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-24 17:30-17:32 ET - Tyler/eFileMaine submitted filings in PA and FM dockets, envelope 238574 and 238575.","displayTitle":"2026-06-24 17:30-17:32 ET - Tyler/eFileMaine submitted filings in PA and FM dockets, envelope 238574 and 238575.","recordAnchor":"PA envelope 238574 submitted at 5:30 PM; FM envelope 238575 submitted at 5:32 PM. These are post-v16B court-access/docket-control anchors.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Tyler/eFileMaine / trial-court docket access","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19efb8b4110af55e and 19efb8c9e260cb27. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"V17-011","sourcePage":92,"dateLabel":"2026-06-24 17:31-17:32 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-24 17:31-17:32 ET - Tyler/eFileMaine service notices issued for PA and FM dockets.","displayTitle":"2026-06-24 17:31-17:32 ET - Tyler/eFileMaine service notices issued for PA and FM dockets.","recordAnchor":"Service notices list other service contacts. For FM, listed Justin Tahai, Patrick Bedard, Justin Tahai, Amanda Morse. For PA, listed Patrick Bedard, Justin Tahai, Amanda Morse. These preserve service-contact metadata and post-v16B Tyler service routing.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Tyler service / notice / service-contact metadata","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19efb8b42e0076f0, 19efb8c9c98dca54, 19efb8c9c0094e5e. Confidence/status: High Source-navigation chronology; native records control. Page 71 of 120","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"V17-012","sourcePage":93,"dateLabel":"2026-06-25 10:54 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-25 10:54 ET - Tyler/Odyssey entry for BIDDC-PA-2024-01285, envelope 238574.","displayTitle":"2026-06-25 10:54 ET - Tyler/Odyssey entry for BIDDC-PA-2024-01285, envelope 238574.","recordAnchor":"Tyler confirmed the filing was received by Clerk Office and entered into Odyssey as Letter - From Party - Filed. Entry time 10:54 AM EST.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Tyler/Odyssey entry / trial-court docket access","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19eff46eca8a5a66. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"V17-013","sourcePage":93,"dateLabel":"2026-06-25 10:55 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-25 10:55 ET - Tyler/Odyssey entry for YORDC-FM-2010-00190, envelope 238575.","displayTitle":"2026-06-25 10:55 ET - Tyler/Odyssey entry for YORDC-FM-2010-00190, envelope 238575.","recordAnchor":"Tyler confirmed the filing was received by Clerk Office and entered into Odyssey as Letter - From Party - Filed. Entry time 10:55 AM EST.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Tyler/Odyssey entry / trial-court docket access","sourceSupport":"Gmail message 19eff478e48a8559. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["efiling"]},{"id":"V17-014","sourcePage":93,"dateLabel":"2026-06-25 08:55-09:44 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-25 08:55-09:44 ET - Federal CM/ECF appeal-record activity in 2:26-cv-00211-LEW.","displayTitle":"2026-06-25 08:55-09:44 ET - Federal CM/ECF appeal-record activity in 2:26-cv-00211-LEW.","recordAnchor":"CM/ECF notices show Appeal Cover Sheet, Clerk Certificate Re Appeal Record, Abbreviated Appeal Record Transmitted to USCA, and USCA Case Number. Each was later forwarded to Bedard for notice at approximately 9:16 and 9:47 AM.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Federal appeal / record transmittal / notice to counsel","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19efedaf2525abac, 19efedba1ee3ec08, 19efede66817fcfc, 19eff079353bdca5, and forwards 19efeecc076860d8, 19efeece64ccc53b, 19efeed0e20cc1b6, 19eff0927679840c. Confidence/status: High","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","appeal","counsel","financial"]},{"id":"V17-015","sourcePage":93,"dateLabel":"2026-06-25 10:03 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-25 10:03 ET - Law Court clerk response to CJC/Law Court preservation packet.","displayTitle":"2026-06-25 10:03 ET - Law Court clerk response to CJC/Law Court preservation packet.","recordAnchor":"Clerk Pollack wrote that the email and filing would be treated like any other email and filing received, except that under the Court latest order it would not be presented to the Court for any action. Justin acknowledged at 10:06 AM.","whyItMatters":"","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Law Court / docketing-presentment limitation / preservation","sourceSupport":"Gmail messages 19eff17a92b21dbd and 19eff1a68702e24e. Confidence/status: High Source-navigation chronology; native records control. Page 72 of 120","statusLimitations":"","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal"]},{"id":"V18-001","sourcePage":98,"dateLabel":"2026-06-25 through 2026-06-29","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-25 through 2026-06-29 - Dental-provider and records-access dispute escalates from direct request to court and Board preservation","displayTitle":"2026-06-25 through 2026-06-29 - Dental-provider and records-access dispute escalates from direct request to court and Board preservation","recordAnchor":"Justin sent repeated requests for child's dental-provider identity, records, appointment information, and authorizations. The sequence culminated in a June 29 trial-court supplemental notice and a Board of Overseers supplement addressing the September 10, 2025 counsel representation concerning a September 15 dental appointment.","whyItMatters":"This converts a general records-access complaint into a dated provider-specific conflict. It links counsel's 2025 appointment representation, Ms. Morse's June 2026 dentist email, the absence of provider data, and requests for independent parental access.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Medical/dental records; shared parental information; counsel-candor preservation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19eff26863e16b6e, 19f01e0ae030d944, 19f0934710027d40, 19f0a6b11c20d733, 19f1462007f66e7a, 19f146dcfa3d7fb8, 19f146e558237587; attachment Trial_Court_Supplemental_Notice_Dental_Provider_Records_Access_20260629.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for the communications and filing content. The timeline does not determine whether the September 2025 appointment occurred or whether any nondisclosure violated a specific order; provider records and official rulings control.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","school","medical","records","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-002","sourcePage":98,"dateLabel":"2026-06-26 dated / served 2026-06-27","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-26 dated / served 2026-06-27 - Request for refund or written docket status preserves February 2026 motions as not withdrawn","displayTitle":"2026-06-26 dated / served 2026-06-27 - Request for refund or written docket status preserves February 2026 motions as not withdrawn","recordAnchor":"A narrow filing requested identification of the docket entries and status associated with the approximately $120 February 2026 filing fee. It expressly stated that underlying contempt, modification, enforcement, implementation, and child-impact motions were not withdrawn.","whyItMatters":"This is an administrative-accounting anchor and a waiver-control anchor. It documents the position that a paid filing had not produced a clear scheduling order, hearing notice, or written status and requests either ordinary processing, a written explanation, or refund/referral.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Trial-court docket status; filing fee; pending-motion preservation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f0671679b74579; attachment RequestForRefundOrDocketStatusNotWithdrawn20260626.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for filing content and service. The chronology does not establish how the clerk or court ultimately accounted for the fee or motions absent a docket entry or written response.","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["court-order","financial"]},{"id":"V18-003","sourcePage":98,"dateLabel":"2026-06-26 through 2026-06-27","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-26 through 2026-06-27 - eFile rejection/resubmission sequence and interim logistics motion served","displayTitle":"2026-06-26 through 2026-06-27 - eFile rejection/resubmission sequence and interim logistics motion served","recordAnchor":"Rejected-filing notifications were forwarded to Bedard and Morse, followed by a motion seeking a narrowly tailored interim implementation order. Requested terms included daily electronic-contact parameters, therapy punctuality and transport, school-tardiness notice, provider/insurance access, authorizations, and a prompt status conference.","whyItMatters":"The sequence shows the requested relief was logistical and severable, not solely punitive. It also supplies an early proceduralbarrier anchor later repeated in July: filings seeking time-sensitive child-impact relief were returned or required correction before judicial review.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"eFileMaine; interim implementation; contact/therapy/school/records logistics.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f04ff217e5819d, 19f0988a3f7cb82d; attachment 02_FM_LEAD_Motion_for_Interim_Order_SIGNED.pdf and associated proposed-order/packet files.","statusLimitations":"High for submission/service materials. Rejection does not establish merits. Later resubmissions and docket treatment must be tracked separately. v18A addendum page 4 | Full v17B preserved unchanged after this addendum","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","medical","records","court-order","efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-004","sourcePage":99,"dateLabel":"2026-06-26 11:45-12:07 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-26 11:45-12:07 ET - Same-day pickup/logistics thread preserved and forwarded to counsel and therapist","displayTitle":"2026-06-26 11:45-12:07 ET - Same-day pickup/logistics thread preserved and forwarded to counsel and therapist","recordAnchor":"The ?Who is picking up child?? thread involved direct coordination with Ms. Morse and was then forwarded to Bedard and Pierce.","whyItMatters":"This is a concrete ordinary-logistics anchor. It shows that even routine production and transportation questions were being preserved in the same broader implementation lane.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Therapy/contact transport; adult coordination.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f049bde1a839e7, 19f04a2cb3756f6f, 19f04ae17c6bcc7e, 19f04af7895a474c.","statusLimitations":"High for email chronology. The individual messages should be read as a complete thread; the timeline does not infer motive from a short logistics exchange.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-005","sourcePage":99,"dateLabel":"2026-06-27 14:05 ET and after","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-27 14:05 ET and after - Public citizen petition distributed to Legislature, media, oversight, and awareness recipients","displayTitle":"2026-06-27 14:05 ET and after - Public citizen petition distributed to Legislature, media, oversight, and awareness recipients","recordAnchor":"The petition titled ?The Weaponization of Time Against Maine's Children? was distributed broadly with the public-release PDF and later forwarded to a private awareness list.","whyItMatters":"This formally expands the record from litigation notice to a public-policy and legislative lane. It also creates a distinct communications category that should not be confused with direct child-logistics emails.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Public accountability; legislative notice; media/oversight preservation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f0a41d03887745, 19f0a9a127647b2a; attachment Citizen_Petition_Public_Release.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for distribution metadata and attachment content. Public allegations and policy arguments are advocacy, not adjudicated findings.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V18-006","sourcePage":99,"dateLabel":"2026-06-28 07:15-17:06 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-28 07:15-17:06 ET - July 3 fireworks request placed directly to child; screenshot records ?No? response","displayTitle":"2026-06-28 07:15-17:06 ET - July 3 fireworks request placed directly to child; screenshot records ?No? response","recordAnchor":"Justin requested a clear adult response and logistics for July 3 fireworks. Ms. Morse sent an image showing she asked child, ?Do you want to go with Dad on July 3rd to see fireworks?? child replied ?No,? and she answered, ?Ok, I?ll let him know.?","whyItMatters":"This is direct evidence relevant to the child-choice/gatekeeper issue. The adult request was converted into a yes/no question for the child rather than an adult-facilitated proposal with logistics or an alternative/make-up option.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Holiday parenting time; child-choice framing; implementation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f0df09b9537aa9, 19f0eb0d0c4369ed, 19f0eb2562e5acdb, 19f0ef2b34e05c05, 19f100de0a6cb1e9; native attachment image0.png.","statusLimitations":"High for the screenshot and email chain. The exchange does not by itself prove coaching, coercion, or a violation; it shows the request was put to child and declined in that format.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"V18-007","sourcePage":99,"dateLabel":"2026-06-29 09:10-10:59 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-29 09:10-10:59 ET - Law Court confirms briefing complete and appeal set for October on the briefs","displayTitle":"2026-06-29 09:10-10:59 ET - Law Court confirms briefing complete and appeal set for October on the briefs","recordAnchor":"Associate Clerk Kim Patterson stated that all briefs had been filed, the Law Court was not waiting on anything further from the parties, the case was set for October on the briefs, and no decision timing was known.","whyItMatters":"This fixes the appellate posture and removes uncertainty about outstanding briefing. It also confirms that the appellate decision lane may remain unresolved for months, increasing the practical importance of the May 12 usual-course enforcement direction.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Yor-26-118 / Yor-26-46 appellate status.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f1380e8555df11 and 19f13e4b79c5b438.","statusLimitations":"High for clerk status. ?October on the briefs? is an administrative schedule, not a merits forecast and not a statement that trial-court enforcement must wait.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","appeal"]},{"id":"V18-008","sourcePage":99,"dateLabel":"2026-06-29 11:13-13:30 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-29 11:13-13:30 ET - Law Court status and dental/provider issues preserved through public, Board, and Rule 5 filings","displayTitle":"2026-06-29 11:13-13:30 ET - Law Court status and dental/provider issues preserved through public, Board, and Rule 5 filings","recordAnchor":"The June 29 appellate status was incorporated into a continuing-child-impact notice; the dental appointment/provider issue was separately served on Bedard and Morse and supplemented to Board file 26-240.","whyItMatters":"This date consolidates three distinct notice lanes: appellate delay, trial-court records access, and attorney-discipline preservation.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Appellate status; dental records; Board preservation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f13f1a6dc84998, 19f1453abeba287d, 19f1462007f66e7a, 19f146dcfa3d7fb8, 19f146e558237587.","statusLimitations":"High for communications. Board notice does not imply disciplinary action or a finding. v18A addendum page 5 | Full v17B preserved unchanged after this addendum","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["medical","records","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-009","sourcePage":100,"dateLabel":"2026-06-30 09:36 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-30 09:36 ET - Written demand for two weekly in-person visits and non-disparagement implementation","displayTitle":"2026-06-30 09:36 ET - Written demand for two weekly in-person visits and non-disparagement implementation","recordAnchor":"Justin asked Ms. Morse to provide proposed dates, times, and locations for two in-person visits each week under the February 11 order and asked for confirmation that child was not being shown or exposed to filings, accusations, blame narratives, or disparagement.","whyItMatters":"The email states the legal/implementation position clearly: respecting child's schedule and desires does not make him the sole adult decision-maker responsible for whether contact occurs. It also requests a plain written position if contact will happen only when child first requests or approves it.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"February 11 order; in-person contact; non-disparagement; adult facilitation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f18be776c1b2c5.","statusLimitations":"High for the request. The email is party advocacy and does not establish what the order ultimately requires without the order's full text and judicial interpretation.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact"]},{"id":"V18-010","sourcePage":100,"dateLabel":"2026-06-30 11:39-12:43 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-30 11:39-12:43 ET - Citizen petition filed/served in Law Court and Rule 5/Board lanes","displayTitle":"2026-06-30 11:39-12:43 ET - Citizen petition filed/served in Law Court and Rule 5/Board lanes","recordAnchor":"The public petition was emailed to Law Court clerk addresses, copied to Bedard and Morse, received an automated Law Court acknowledgment, and was separately served to Bedard/Board and forwarded to Ms. Morse.","whyItMatters":"This creates a documented service and awareness chain for the public petition and separates it from later July 11-12 article notices.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Law Court notice; Rule 5 service; Board/public preservation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f192f70adb6745, 19f193049077c277, 19f193bcd4946777, 19f196a599f73989; attachments Citizen_Petition_Public_Release.pdf and YORDC-FM-2010-00190_Exhibit_A_Citizen_Petition_Public_Release_20260630.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for transmission/receipt. An automated receipt does not equal docket acceptance or merits consideration.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["records","appeal","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V18-011","sourcePage":100,"dateLabel":"2026-06-30 22:25 through 2026-07-01 20:27 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-06-30 22:25 through 2026-07-01 20:27 ET - Public-accountability review and enhanced analysis preserved to parties and neutral observers","displayTitle":"2026-06-30 22:25 through 2026-07-01 20:27 ET - Public-accountability review and enhanced analysis preserved to parties and neutral observers","recordAnchor":"Notices were sent concerning a public-accountability review, a Board supplement, and a corrected master-timeline enhanced analysis report addressing continuing child-impact, records-access, implementation, school, counseling, appellate, and process-integrity issues.","whyItMatters":"This establishes that the relevant parties and selected observers were given an organized analytical record before the July filing/routing disputes.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Public accountability; timeline preservation; cross-case synthesis.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f1b7ec7886b1fd, 19f1b9001b11bb73, 19f201346fd6abb3, 19f20392d58eef44; attachment JTforME_Master_Timeline_Enhanced_Analysis_Report_20260701_CORRECTED_LONG_ANCHOR.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for distribution and report content. Analytical reports remain party-created work product, not independent findings.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","school","appeal","counsel","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V18-012","sourcePage":100,"dateLabel":"2026-07-01 17:00 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-01 17:00 ET - Nineteen outstanding implementation and records items consolidated in one email","displayTitle":"2026-07-01 17:00 ET - Nineteen outstanding implementation and records items consolidated in one email","recordAnchor":"Justin sent a consolidated list of unresolved items dating from the November 2024 event lane and February 11 order, including provider, school, insurance, MaineCare, records, in-person contact, and concerns about adult commentary during periods when child's communication dropped.","whyItMatters":"This is a useful issue-index anchor that reduces the need to cite many isolated requests. It also demonstrates the breadth of the alleged nonresponse/implementation problem as of July 1.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Consolidated implementation index; records; contact; child-impact concerns.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f1f7b9a76cdf25.","statusLimitations":"High for the email. Items described as ?still awaiting? are the sender's status assertions and should be checked against any replies, docket entries, or produced records.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","school","medical"]},{"id":"V18-013","sourcePage":100,"dateLabel":"2026-07-02","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-02 - Immediate-implementation/GAL materials and hearing-history request served","displayTitle":"2026-07-02 - Immediate-implementation/GAL materials and hearing-history request served","recordAnchor":"Rule 5 emails served an immediate-implementation/Father's Day/GAL packet and a separate request identifying the date of the last family-matter hearing before November 2024.","whyItMatters":"These filings continued the effort to obtain immediate implementation and to clarify the historical hearing record for later court review.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Immediate relief; GAL/neutral review; hearing-history record. MASTER TIMELINE v18A - JULYACCOUNTABILITY 12, 2026 UPDATE EDITION","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f23e8e23473f1f, 19f2559d32f2a5eb; attachments 00_Motion_Immediate_Implementation_Fathers_Day_GAL_20260621.pdf and Request_Date_Last_Family_Matter_Hearing_Prior_to_Nov_2024_20260702.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for service metadata. Docket acceptance and rulings require official entries.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V18-014","sourcePage":101,"dateLabel":"2026-07-03 10:54 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-03 10:54 ET - Renewed motion to disqualify counsel and request neutral review served","displayTitle":"2026-07-03 10:54 ET - Renewed motion to disqualify counsel and request neutral review served","recordAnchor":"A renewed motion and proposed order were served on Bedard, Morse, and Pierce, seeking counsel disqualification and neutral review.","whyItMatters":"This is the principal July 3 procedural anchor for the counsel-conflict and neutral-review lane. It should be distinguished from later public statements and from the July 12 narrower child-centered review request.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Counsel disqualification; neutral review; Rule 5 service.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f2879a647dd80e; attachments PLAINTIFF_RENEWED_MOTION_DISQUALIFY_COUNSEL_NEUTRAL_REVIEW_MORIN_UPDATED_20260703.pdf and proposed order.","statusLimitations":"High for filing content and service. The motion’s allegations are contested advocacy; no grant is established by the reviewed record.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-015","sourcePage":101,"dateLabel":"2026-07-03 through 2026-07-05","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-03 through 2026-07-05 - Holiday parenting-time and weekly-contact requests remain disputed; nonresponse notice escalates","displayTitle":"2026-07-03 through 2026-07-05 - Holiday parenting-time and weekly-contact requests remain disputed; nonresponse notice escalates","recordAnchor":"Emails sought July 3/4 holiday time, make-up time, and ordinary weekly in-person contact. The July 4 consolidated notice asked for a plain position if no holiday time, make-up time, therapy information, or contact logistics would be provided. A July 5 email characterized the pattern as delay and obstruction.","whyItMatters":"This sequence follows directly from the June 28 child-choice exchange and shows no adult-negotiated holiday plan emerging in the reviewed emails.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Holiday contact; make-up time; weekly implementation; nonresponse preservation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f29b18d9aecc40, 19f2df7511469f0c, 19f2e4f2abf3c047, 19f2f8ebbe17271d, 19f313790a572625.","statusLimitations":"High for the email sequence. The July 5 characterizations are forceful party advocacy, not findings. Any omitted reply or later contact arrangement would need to be added.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy"]},{"id":"V18-016","sourcePage":101,"dateLabel":"2026-07-03 through 2026-07-04","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-03 through 2026-07-04 - Public-accountability statement distributed across court, executive, legislative, oversight, and media lanes","displayTitle":"2026-07-03 through 2026-07-04 - Public-accountability statement distributed across court, executive, legislative, oversight, and media lanes","recordAnchor":"A July 3 public-accountability statement and July 4 follow-up were sent broadly, with a lead filing PDF and related notice emails.","whyItMatters":"This expands institutional notice and documents the distinction between public-policy communications and direct parent-child implementation requests.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Public accountability; institutional notice; policy advocacy.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f293237810f02a, 19f297654f5043ed, 19f298f60c624ace, 19f2e5a10d663eae; attachment Lead_Filing_Public_Accountability_Statement_2026-07-03.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for distribution. The statements are public advocacy and should not be treated as evidence of the truth of every assertion without underlying sources.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V18-017","sourcePage":101,"dateLabel":"2026-07-06 13:32 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-06 13:32 ET - Full unredacted record package sent as follow-up public petition","displayTitle":"2026-07-06 13:32 ET - Full unredacted record package sent as follow-up public petition","recordAnchor":"A mass follow-up to the public petition included After_Notice_Full_Record_Package_UNREDACTED_ATTACHMENTS_20260706.pdf.","whyItMatters":"This is a major disclosure/distribution anchor and confirms that the public-accountability lane included an unredacted record package, not only summary commentary.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Legislative/media/oversight distribution; full-record preservation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f387d411af63eb; attachment After_Notice_Full_Record_Package_UNREDACTED_ATTACHMENTS_20260706.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for transmission metadata. Privacy, confidentiality, and relevance of individual components require source-bysource review; distribution does not equal endorsement by recipients. v18A addendum page 6 | Full v17B preserved unchanged after this addendum Source-navigation chronology; native records control. Page 80 of 120 v18A addendum page 7 | Full v17B preserved unchanged after this addendum","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["public-accountability"]},{"id":"V18-018","sourcePage":102,"dateLabel":"2026-07-07 13:17-13:30 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-07 13:17-13:30 ET - Federal response filed after July 7 filing-restriction order","displayTitle":"2026-07-07 13:17-13:30 ET - Federal response filed after July 7 filing-restriction order","recordAnchor":"Justin sent a written response to the federal July 7 filing-restriction order to court intake and the Attorney General, with Bedard, legislators, and other recipients copied or notified.","whyItMatters":"This preserves the federal access-to-courts lane and the response to a filing-volume restriction while the state-court implementation dispute remained active.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Federal court; filing restriction; access-to-justice preservation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f3d95d29ed6bbc and 19f3da1a048703c3; attachment Plaintiff_Response_to_July_7_2026_Filing_Restriction_Order.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for filing/transmission. The federal order and docket control the legal effect; this entry does not characterize the response as accepted or successful.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"V18-019","sourcePage":102,"dateLabel":"2026-07-07 14:56-19:01 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-07 14:56-19:01 ET - Pierce clinical thread identifies stress, perception, parental-rights support, and email-volume risk","displayTitle":"2026-07-07 14:56-19:01 ET - Pierce clinical thread identifies stress, perception, parental-rights support, and email-volume risk","recordAnchor":"Pierce expressed concern that the email volume and perceived attacks on child's mother were affecting child and relationship repair. He later said he supported Justin exercising parental rights, but recommended evaluating whether each action supported reconnection, suggested a weekly summary, emphasized therapeutic safety, and offered a solo meeting or pause in group work.","whyItMatters":"This is the strongest new clinical anchor and an important adverse-record control. It supports concern that child is carrying parental conflict while also warning that the method of advocacy may itself be counterproductive.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Reunification therapy; clinical perception; conflict exposure; relationship repair.","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread 19f3df023402363a, including messages 19f3df023402363a, 19f3df230735c097, 19f3df74deec211f, 19f3dfab48447353, 19f3e04211254890, 19f3e7bea8151531, 19f3ed0fd8d08df2.","statusLimitations":"High for email content; these are clinical impressions and recommendations, not a forensic evaluation or custody opinion. The thread also contains one profane reply to counsel, which should remain preserved as a tone/adverse-record fact.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","counsel","safety"]},{"id":"V18-020","sourcePage":102,"dateLabel":"2026-07-07 18:54 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-07 18:54 ET - Pierce thread preserved as a filed/service exhibit to Bedard","displayTitle":"2026-07-07 18:54 ET - Pierce thread preserved as a filed/service exhibit to Bedard","recordAnchor":"The full ?Thoughts? email thread was converted to Exhibit A and emailed to Bedard for preservation.","whyItMatters":"This reduces selective-quotation risk and demonstrates contemporaneous notice that both Pierce's criticism and Justin's responses were being preserved.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Therapy evidence; Rule 5 preservation; completeness control.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f3eca523203935; attachment Exhibit_A_Dan_Pierce_Thoughts_Email_Preservation.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for service. Whether the exhibit was accepted into a court docket must be shown separately.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-021","sourcePage":102,"dateLabel":"2026-07-07","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-07 - Additional public judicial-accountability statement served with covered exhibit","displayTitle":"2026-07-07 - Additional public judicial-accountability statement served with covered exhibit","recordAnchor":"A Rule 5 service/public-notice email included Exhibit_A_Public_Judicial_Accountability_Notice_Covered_2026-07-07.pdf.","whyItMatters":"This is another institutional-notice anchor and shows continued overlap between litigation service and public-accountability communications.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Public judicial accountability; service/preservation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f3d8b23e429258; attachment Exhibit_A_Public_Judicial_Accountability_Notice_Covered_2026-07-07.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for transmission. Public-accountability language is advocacy and should be separated analytically from direct childrelated evidence.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["general"]},{"id":"V18-022","sourcePage":102,"dateLabel":"2026-07-08 10:12 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-08 10:12 ET - Interim implementation motion resubmitted after Tyler return for missing proposed order","displayTitle":"2026-07-08 10:12 ET - Interim implementation motion resubmitted after Tyler return for missing proposed order","recordAnchor":"The resubmission packet included the corrected motion, Exhibit A Tyler rejection notice, a separate proposed order, and relation-back comments. The service email stated that the previous submission had been returned for failure to include a proposed order.","whyItMatters":"This is a concrete procedural-delay anchor and shows prompt correction. It also documents that requested relief remained severable and urgent more than five months after the February 11 order.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"eFileMaine rejection/correction; interim implementation; relation back.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f421275dfc83a2; attachments 01_Resubmitted_Motion_Interim_Implementation_Order_20260708.pdf, 02_Exhibit_A_Tyler_Rejection_Email_20260708.pdf, 03_Proposed_Order_Interim_Implementation_20260708.pdf, and comments text.","statusLimitations":"High for service and return reason. The reviewed email does not by itself show final clerk acceptance or judicial disposition. MASTER TIMELINE v18A - JULYACCOUNTABILITY 12, 2026 UPDATE EDITION","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"V18-023","sourcePage":103,"dateLabel":"2026-07-08 14:50 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-08 14:50 ET - July 2 clerk letter received July 8; sequence clarification and renewed immediate-relief request served","displayTitle":"2026-07-08 14:50 ET - July 2 clerk letter received July 8; sequence clarification and renewed immediate-relief request served","recordAnchor":"A three-page notice stated that Ms. Howard’s July 2 letter was not received until July 8, after several filings had already been submitted or served. It requested relation back, a line-item interim order, a prompt status conference, contact logistics, therapy protocols, school notice, records access, and non-disparagement protections.","whyItMatters":"This fixes the notice/receipt sequence and explains why filings continued before the clerk’s correspondence arrived. It also consolidates the relief sought after correction of the Tyler proposed-order issue.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Clerk correspondence; filing sequence; immediate interim relief.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f431156556fd50; attachment Notice_July8_Receipt_July2_Letter_20260708.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for filing content and service. The notice’s reference to relation back under M.R.E.C.S. 35(E) is a party request, not a confirmed ruling.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","school","records","efiling","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V18-024","sourcePage":103,"dateLabel":"2026-07-08","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-08 - July 10 appointment reminder and additional filing letter preserved","displayTitle":"2026-07-08 - July 10 appointment reminder and additional filing letter preserved","recordAnchor":"The July 10 appointment reminder was forwarded to Morse and Bedard, and a separate court letter was served to Bedard with Anderson copied.","whyItMatters":"These are supporting logistics and filing-history anchors surrounding the corrected July 8 motion practice.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Therapy scheduling; filing/service record.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f4281617e277b4 and 19f4469b669bf541; attachments appointment.ics and Letter_to_Court_Final_Justin_Tahai_Plaintiff_20260708.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for transmission. The appointment reminder is logistical; the filing letter’s legal effect depends on docket treatment.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","court-order","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-025","sourcePage":103,"dateLabel":"2026-07-09 15:28 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-09 15:28 ET - Continuing-harm supplemental amendment served to Bedard","displayTitle":"2026-07-09 15:28 ET - Continuing-harm supplemental amendment served to Bedard","recordAnchor":"Plaintiff_Supplemental_Notice_Continuing_Harm_Trial_Court_20260709.pdf was served under Rule 5 as a supplemental amendment/continuing-harm addendum.","whyItMatters":"This is the lead document used in the subsequent July 9 administrative-routing attempt and ties the continuing child-impact assertions to a specific written filing.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Trial-court continuing harm; implementation; Rule 5 service.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f485a83ec6939c; attachment Plaintiff_Supplemental_Notice_Continuing_Harm_Trial_Court_20260709.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for service. Docket acceptance and merits remain separate.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["counsel"]},{"id":"V18-026","sourcePage":103,"dateLabel":"2026-07-09 16:06-16:23 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-09 16:06-16:23 ET - Administrative-routing emails sent with July 9 notice and May [private address redacted] order","displayTitle":"2026-07-09 16:06-16:23 ET - Administrative-routing emails sent with July 9 notice and May [private address redacted] order","recordAnchor":"Justin emailed trial-court judicial addresses, copying Bedard and Julie Howard, expressly stating that he was not seeking ex parte relief but requesting routing, docket review, or clear filing instructions. He asserted that an FM-218 request appeared to have been denied or rejected on the mistaken premise that a Law Court order was still required, even though the May 12 order had already permitted usual-course enforcement.","whyItMatters":"This is the clearest record of the alleged routing failure and the reason the May 12 order became a repeated attachment.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Trial-court routing; May [private address redacted] order; FM-218 expedition/implementation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f487d4864956b7, 19f488c543401fa3; attachments July 9 supplemental notice and ATTACHMENT_Law_Court_May_12_2026_Usual_Course_Order.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for emails and attachments. One address variant bounced. The later clerk response rejected direct judicial contact and stated the email would not be acted on.","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["contact","court-order","appeal","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-027","sourcePage":103,"dateLabel":"2026-07-09 18:03 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-09 18:03 ET - School fall-athletics communication forwarded for extracurricular logistics","displayTitle":"2026-07-09 18:03 ET - School fall-athletics communication forwarded for extracurricular logistics","recordAnchor":"A school [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] communication was forwarded to Ms. Morse with Bedard copied, requesting confirmation of any logistics requiring coordination.","whyItMatters":"This is a specific school/extracurricular information-flow anchor and supports the broader request for timely direct parental notice.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"School/extracurricular access and logistics.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f48e84324a9299.","statusLimitations":"High for forwarding. The timeline does not establish whether a response or participation arrangement followed. v18A addendum page 8 | Full v17B preserved unchanged after this addendum Source-navigation chronology; native records control. Page 82 of 120 MASTER TIMELINE v18A - JULYACCOUNTABILITY 12, 2026 UPDATE EDITION","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["school","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-028","sourcePage":104,"dateLabel":"2026-07-10 07:36-08:35 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-10 07:36-08:35 ET - Clerk rejects email filing and directs motion practice","displayTitle":"2026-07-10 07:36-08:35 ET - Clerk rejects email filing and directs motion practice","recordAnchor":"Julie Howard stated that the filing could not be accepted by email, the court does not act on letters, direct contact with judges is forbidden, and the submission would not be acted on. After Justin acknowledged the direction and requested procedural guidance, she stated: [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained]","whyItMatters":"This is the controlling July 10 procedural-guidance anchor. It explains why later submissions were framed as formal motion/supplemental eFilings and why the July 12 service email copied the clerk for routing awareness rather than asking for a merits ruling by email.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Clerk procedure; no email filing; motion required.","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread 19f487b3f2dcccbd, especially messages 19f4bd0b71eb5646, 19f4bdb36cf97fab, 19f4c0641de1f844.","statusLimitations":"High for clerk statements. The initial routing emails were not accepted filings and should not be described otherwise.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","court-order"]},{"id":"V18-029","sourcePage":104,"dateLabel":"2026-07-10 08:19-08:26 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-10 08:19-08:26 ET - Combined formal-routing packet and hand-delivery cover served to parties","displayTitle":"2026-07-10 08:19-08:26 ET - Combined formal-routing packet and hand-delivery cover served to parties","recordAnchor":"Rule 5 emails served a combined formal-routing/record-preservation packet and a separate hand-delivery emergency-routing cover with Tyler/eFileMaine documentation.","whyItMatters":"This documents an alternative attempt to place the same core materials into a procedurally usable packet after the clerk’s motion-only guidance and eFiling barriers.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Formal routing; hand delivery; record preservation; eFile documentation.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f4bf80c10884c4, 19f4bfe58cde1a7e; attachments 98_COMBINED_FILING_PACKET_Formal_Routing_Record_Preservation_2026-07-10.pdf, 00_Hand_Delivery_Cover_Letter_Emergency_Routing_Julie_Howard_2026-07-10.pdf, and Tyler screenshot PDF.","statusLimitations":"High for service materials. Hand-delivery intent or cover preparation does not establish clerk acceptance without receipt/docket proof.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["court-order","efiling"]},{"id":"V18-030","sourcePage":104,"dateLabel":"2026-07-10 08:38-08:39 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-10 08:38-08:39 ET - Law Court meaningful-access/formal-routing packet submitted in Yor-26-118 and auto-acknowledged","displayTitle":"2026-07-10 08:38-08:39 ET - Law Court meaningful-access/formal-routing packet submitted in Yor-26-118 and auto-acknowledged","recordAnchor":"A combined packet was emailed to the Law Court clerk, with Bedard and the Attorney General copied, under the subject [quoted language omitted in public web edition; native source retained] The Law Court system generated a receipt.","whyItMatters":"This preserves the higher-court notice that trial-court implementation requests were encountering routing, rejection, and access barriers notwithstanding the May 12 usual-course order.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Law Court preservation; meaningful access; trial-court routing.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f4c094cb46f278 and 19f4c0a2bf97408a; attachment Law_Court_Combined_Formal_Routing_Meaningful_Access_Packet_2026-07-10.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for transmission and automated receipt. The receipt does not establish that the packet was docketed or that relief was granted.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["appeal","efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-031","sourcePage":104,"dateLabel":"2026-07-10 11:56 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-10 11:56 ET - Parenting-time request seeks concrete scheduling around therapist availability","displayTitle":"2026-07-10 11:56 ET - Parenting-time request seeks concrete scheduling around therapist availability","recordAnchor":"Justin asked Morse and Bedard for dates and times for the following week because Pierce had a July 17 funeral and limited availability. The email stated that provider scheduling should not eliminate court-ordered contact and requested concrete options.","whyItMatters":"This is a focused implementation attempt tied to a real provider constraint and shows a proposed adult-coordination path rather than an abstract demand.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Parenting time; therapist availability; scheduling.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f4cbeb8c792842.","statusLimitations":"High for request. The reviewed record does not establish a responsive schedule.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","therapy","medical","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-032","sourcePage":104,"dateLabel":"2026-07-10 through 2026-07-11","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-10 through 2026-07-11 - Board/professional notice, therapy billing, and FM-to-PA-to-appeal policy statement distributed","displayTitle":"2026-07-10 through 2026-07-11 - Board/professional notice, therapy billing, and FM-to-PA-to-appeal policy statement distributed","recordAnchor":"A professional courtesy notice was sent in the GCF-25-524/26-240 oversight lane; a Pierce billing document was forwarded to Bedard and Morse; and a Legislature/media packet argued that pressure shifted from the FM case to the PA and appellate lanes.","whyItMatters":"These are distinct but related preservation anchors showing continued oversight notice, therapy-cost information flow, and public-policy framing immediately before the July 12 filing.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Board oversight; therapy billing; legislative/media policy lane. v18A addendum page 9 | Full v17B preserved unchanged after this addendum Source-navigation chronology; native records control. Page 83 of 120 v18A addendum page 10 | Full v17B preserved unchanged after this addendum","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f4d5fda0279dc3, 19f5121167f23f80, 19f5330583a6f311; attachment Legislature_Media_Email_FM_to_PA_Pressure_Shift.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for transmission. The pressure-shift theory is advocacy; billing documents should be interpreted from the original invoice.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["therapy","records","appeal","counsel","public-accountability","financial"]},{"id":"V18-033","sourcePage":105,"dateLabel":"2026-07-11 09:40 ET / response 2026-07-12 11:56 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-11 09:40 ET / response 2026-07-12 11:56 ET - Immediate-contact demand followed by categorical denial of exposure and ?cannot force him? response","displayTitle":"2026-07-11 09:40 ET / response 2026-07-12 11:56 ET - Immediate-contact demand followed by categorical denial of exposure and ?cannot force him? response","recordAnchor":"Justin stated that child had not responded in more than a week, demanded a specific contact time, and asked that child not be made gatekeeper or emotional container. Ms. Morse replied that child had not seen emails or motions, that no one talked about Justin around him or otherwise, that his contact information was unchanged, and that she could not force him to reply.","whyItMatters":"This is the central factual-dispute anchor for the July 12 neutral-review filing: categorical denial of exposure on one side, continuing communication collapse and adult-facilitation concerns on the other.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Electronic contact; adult facilitation; child-impact factual dispute.","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread 19f5168e0b34ff3f; messages 19f5168e26ec17e3 and 19f570be50dbcfc1; Exhibit_A_Email_Immediate_Implementation_2026-07-12.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for exact words. The emails do not resolve credibility. ?Cannot force him? may reflect a practical limit, but it is directly relevant to what affirmative facilitation is occurring.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","court-order","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V18-034","sourcePage":105,"dateLabel":"2026-07-11 22:50 ET through 2026-07-12 13:13 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-11 22:50 ET through 2026-07-12 13:13 ET - Public-article courtesy notice produces ?I don?t care? exchange and express child clarification","displayTitle":"2026-07-11 22:50 ET through 2026-07-12 13:13 ET - Public-article courtesy notice produces ?I don?t care? exchange and express child clarification","recordAnchor":"Ms. Morse first replied to a public-article notice, ?Please stop sending these to me. I really don?t care.? After Justin linked the issue to child, she replied: ?It has nothing to do with child. I just don?t care about your ramblings. If it is directly about child, I care.?","whyItMatters":"The complete exchange is relevant to communication breakdown and to the relationship between public commentary and the family dispute. It also corrects any misleading use of the isolated phrase by expressly distinguishing child.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Public commentary; party communication; completeness/candor control.","sourceSupport":"Gmail thread 19f543adf1677a3f; messages 19f543bd020c3688, 19f543fbd850f795, 19f570c9cbec93bc, 19f570f49df57d54, 19f5751c65ca26bb; Exhibit_D_Actual_Gmail_Email_Thread_July_12_2026.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for exact email content. The statement must not be offered as an admission that Ms. Morse does not care about child; her follow-up expressly says the opposite when the subject is directly child.","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["public-accountability"]},{"id":"V18-035","sourcePage":105,"dateLabel":"2026-07-12 12:39-12:42 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-12 12:39-12:42 ET - Neutral child-centered supplemental filing served with May [private address redacted] order and submitted through Tyler","displayTitle":"2026-07-12 12:39-12:42 ET - Neutral child-centered supplemental filing served with May [private address redacted] order and submitted through Tyler","recordAnchor":"The supplemental notice requested immediate neutral child-centered review, consultation with Pierce, private interview of child, interim non-exposure/contact safeguards, and a prompt status conference. It attached the July 12 implementation email, the articlenotice email, and the May [private address redacted] order. The service email copied Julie Howard and the Law Court clerk.","whyItMatters":"This is the principal July 12 judicial-relief anchor and deliberately seeks neutral fact development rather than asking the court to accept one parent's characterization. It also places the May 12 usual-course order in the same packet.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Neutral review; implementation; Law Court order; formal service.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f5732e877ab5d9; 01_Supplemental_Notice_Neutral_Child_Centered_Review_UPDATED_2026-07-12.pdf; Exhibits A-C; Law Court auto receipt 19f5733ae164da73.","statusLimitations":"High for the filing and service. The filing's ?approximately six months? language is supported as nearly six months from January 16 (177 days) and five months from February 11 (151 days). Relief remains pending unless a later order shows otherwise.","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["contact","court-order","appeal","efiling","public-accountability"]},{"id":"V18-036","sourcePage":105,"dateLabel":"2026-07-12 12:42 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-12 12:42 ET - Tyler Envelope No. 245830 confirms submission and generated service contacts","displayTitle":"2026-07-12 12:42 ET - Tyler Envelope No. 245830 confirms submission and generated service contacts","recordAnchor":"Tyler's Submitted Filing Notification states that a Letter - From Party - Filed was submitted to the District Court at 12:42 p.m. under Envelope No. 245830 with EFileAndServe activity. The service notice lists Justin Tahai, Patrick Bedard, and Amanda Morse as service contacts.","whyItMatters":"This supplies machine-generated, same-day submission and service evidence and responds to prior concerns that court staff may not see filer-side Tyler notices.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"eFileMaine/Tyler submission; service authentication.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f57364415887e3 and 19f573648a82734d; Exhibit_E_Tyler_Submitted_Filing_Notification_Envelope_245830.pdf; Exhibit_F_Tyler_Notification_of_Service_Envelope_245830.pdf.","statusLimitations":"High for Tyler notice content. ?Submitted? and ?notification of service? do not equal a judicial ruling; the precise docket/acceptance status should be confirmed from the case docket. MASTER TIMELINE v18A - JULYACCOUNTABILITY 12, 2026 UPDATE EDITION","sourceType":"Direct communication","tags":["contact","efiling","counsel"]},{"id":"V18-037","sourcePage":106,"dateLabel":"2026-07-12 13:30 ET","year":2026,"title":"2026-07-12 13:30 ET - Exhibits D-F submitted for same-day association and relation back to Envelope No. 245830","displayTitle":"2026-07-12 13:30 ET - Exhibits D-F submitted for same-day association and relation back to Envelope No. 245830","recordAnchor":"A supplemental cover requested that the complete Gmail thread and the two Tyler notices be associated with the July 12 filing, related back to Envelope No. 245830 to the extent permitted, or docketed as same-day linked exhibits. Bedard, Howard, and the Law Court clerk were copied on the service chain.","whyItMatters":"This closes the July 12 record by preserving exact context, authenticating the submission/service notices, and expressly asking that all components reach the reviewing judicial officer together.","caseIssue":"","issueLane":"Relation back; exhibit association; completeness; routing.","sourceSupport":"Gmail 19f5761ad055cfab; Cover_Letter_Request_to_Associate_Exhibits_D-F_Envelope_245830_2026-07-12.pdf; Exhibits D-F.","statusLimitations":"High for the request and service. Association/relation back remains requested, not confirmed, absent a docket entry or clerk response.","sourceType":"Official court / docket record","tags":["appeal","efiling","counsel"]}]}