{ "meta": { "title": "Amanda Morse Direct Communications - Expanded Public-Safe Exhibit Index", "generated": "2026-08-18T23:59:00-04:00", "count": 24, "coreCount": 16, "supplementalCount": 8, "nativeMessageCount": 31, "packet": "downloads/public-record/Amanda_Morse_Direct_Communications_Expanded_Public_Exhibit_Packet_20260818.pdf", "corePacket": "downloads/public-record/Amanda_Morse_Direct_Communications_Public_Exhibit_Packet_20260818.pdf", "boundary": "Public-safe sender reply extracts. Native Gmail messages and full threads control. Not adjudicated findings. Counter-record and reciprocal context are expressly included." }, "exhibits": [ { "number": 1, "date": "March 2, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19caffbdf4137829" ], "threadSubject": "Daily Electronic Contact - Documented Attempts", "headline": "Daily contact placed at the child's discretion; implementation requests called \"ridiculous emails\"", "issues": [ "contact", "child-gatekeeper", "communication-tone" ], "reply": "He has the one phone number that you have. He has no video platforms. If he is not messaging you back, it's because he does not want to. He's almost 16 years old, I am not going to dictate his time. This communication is at his discretion and what he is comfortable with. Please stop bombarding me with ridiculous emails.\n\nThanks,\nAmanda", "context": "The reply followed a dated list of unanswered text, photo, and call attempts and a request for an approved number, platform, and reasonable daily time window under the February 11 order.", "relevance": "Directly records a written child-discretion position and the response to a logistics-focused request. It does not establish why the child did not respond or whether any particular facilitation measure was legally required.", "source": "Native Gmail message in the account of Justin Tahai; sender-authenticated Gmail metadata; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_01_Daily_contact_placed_at_the_child_s_discretion_implementation_requests_called_ri_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_01_Daily_contact_placed_at_the_child_s_discretion_implementation_requests_called_ri_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 2, "date": "March 9, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19cd50307c2db9a1" ], "threadSubject": "Scheduling Initial In-Person Contact", "headline": "In-person contact would not occur until Ms. Morse saw proof of compliance", "issues": [ "contact", "compliance-filter" ], "reply": "I have seen no proof of the things you were supposed to have done before an in person visit. Therefore, one will not take place until I do.", "context": "The reply followed a request to identify a workable date and time before the stated March 13 contact deadline, with an offer to coordinate through the reunification therapist.", "relevance": "Directly records that contact was being conditioned on Ms. Morse's receipt or review of proof. It does not decide whether the conditions had been satisfied or who had authority to determine compliance.", "source": "Native Gmail message; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_02_In_person_contact_would_not_occur_until_Ms_Morse_saw_proof_of_compliance_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_02_In_person_contact_would_not_occur_until_Ms_Morse_saw_proof_of_compliance_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 3, "date": "March 15, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19cf200cb4daff11" ], "threadSubject": "Contact and Visit Coordination", "headline": "Telephone contact framed as available only \"if he chooses\"", "issues": [ "contact", "child-gatekeeper" ], "reply": "You can text or call him anytime today, if he chooses to speak with you.", "context": "The statement was sent during an active dispute over how the February 11 order's daily electronic contact and in-person progression would be implemented.", "relevance": "Directly records conditional language. It does not establish whether the child was available, willing, or being affirmatively encouraged to participate.", "source": "Native Gmail message; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_03_Telephone_contact_framed_as_available_only_if_he_chooses_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_03_Telephone_contact_framed_as_available_only_if_he_chooses_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 4, "date": "April 23-24, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19dbd68859149236", "19dbda883e4ad412", "19dbdb01697ed0c7" ], "threadSubject": "Scheduled Counseling Session / Corrective Action", "headline": "The \"sole gatekeeper\" position stated in writing", "issues": [ "contact", "therapy", "child-gatekeeper", "communication-tone" ], "reply": "He's a rational, independent, level headed 15 year old boy who is learning how to prioritize, be responsible and make his own decisions. You have to let him.\n\nYou can ask him about this weekend all by yourself. You do not need me to mediate. If you feel that you do need me to be a buffer in your communication with [the child] then it's not time for in person contact to start. That is going to be solely his decision.\n\nThe court order plainly states that [the child] is the sole gatekeeper of any contact decisions made and their frequency. It also states that it has to be around his schedule. Whether or not you agree with it is irrelevant. Whether one event was scheduled before the other is irrelevant. The timing of his schedule change not being in a time frame that you see fits is irrelevant.\n\nIt is not my \"interpretation.\" It is verbatim.", "context": "A provider-confirmed therapy/contact session was displaced by a driver-education appointment. Justin did not object to driver education and proposed either direct weekend time or a prompt make-up session. The messages above are assembled from three replies in the same sequence.", "relevance": "This is the clearest direct-writing anchor for the disputed child-as-gatekeeper interpretation. The official order controls; the exhibit does not decide whether Ms. Morse's reading was legally correct.", "source": "Three native Gmail messages in one thread; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_04_The_sole_gatekeeper_position_stated_in_writing_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_04_The_sole_gatekeeper_position_stated_in_writing_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 5, "date": "April 25, 2026, 5:42 p.m. ET", "messageIds": [ "19dc6987479b58ea" ], "threadSubject": "Continued Nonresponse and Preservation of Counseling / Contact Time", "headline": "In-person contact described as the child's decision; ordinary email threatened with PFA reporting", "issues": [ "contact", "child-gatekeeper", "communication-restriction", "pfa" ], "reply": "To reiterate, it is not a burden being put on [the child] whether or not to have in person contact. It is a decision that he is able to make and have control of on his own. If he tells me that he wants in-person contact, I will gladly assist in scheduling. He has not wanted to. I will not force him to comply until you have complied with the terms of the order needed for in person contact to begin.\n\nI did not say timing is irrelevant, I said your idea of how time frames should be structured is irrelevant.\n\nLastly, I again ask that you stop emailing me unless absolutely necessary (i.e., emergencies) or I will be forced to report them with NBPD as violations of the PFA. If and when there are issues you need to be aware of, I will inform you. No other contact is necessary.\n\n-Amanda", "context": "The reply followed a request to preserve, replace, or make up a displaced therapy/contact opportunity and to address an individual-counseling recommendation. The native thread contains the full wording of both sides.", "relevance": "Directly records both the child-control position and the threatened police/PFA response to non-emergency email. It does not decide whether any email violated a protection order.", "source": "Native Gmail message; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_05_In_person_contact_described_as_the_child_s_decision_ordinary_email_threatened_wi_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_05_In_person_contact_described_as_the_child_s_decision_ordinary_email_threatened_wi_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 6, "date": "June 26, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19f04a2cb3756f6f" ], "threadSubject": "Who Is Picking Up the Child?", "headline": "Disputed dangerous-driving accusation and personal admonition", "issues": [ "communication-tone", "transportation", "disputed-accusation" ], "reply": "Please stop putting not only our child's life in danger, but my younger child's life as well with your erratic driving. Control your emotions like an adult and stop endangering innocent people.", "context": "The reply followed a short logistics message stating that the child was outside waiting for the adult who had driven him. The public record presently available for this packet does not adjudicate the driving accusation.", "relevance": "Proves the accusation and tone were transmitted. It does not prove the accusation true, and the page labels it as disputed and unadjudicated.", "source": "Native Gmail message; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_06_Disputed_dangerous_driving_accusation_and_personal_admonition_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_06_Disputed_dangerous_driving_accusation_and_personal_admonition_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 7, "date": "June 27, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19f0a6b11c20d733" ], "threadSubject": "Dentist", "headline": "Dental-provider concern attributed to the father's possible attendance", "issues": [ "medical-records", "child-narrative" ], "reply": "[The child] decided not to switch dentistry providers. His initial concern with going was that you would show up, however he has since seen them and been comfortable.", "context": "The statement was sent as a standalone update concerning dental care.", "relevance": "Directly records what Ms. Morse attributed to the child. It does not establish the source, accuracy, or cause of the reported concern.", "source": "Native Gmail message; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_07_Dental_provider_concern_attributed_to_the_father_s_possible_attendance_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_07_Dental_provider_concern_attributed_to_the_father_s_possible_attendance_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 8, "date": "June 28, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19f0eb0d0c4369ed" ], "threadSubject": "July 3 Fireworks / Fourth of July Holiday", "headline": "Holiday request answered only with the child's stated refusal", "issues": [ "holiday", "contact", "child-gatekeeper" ], "reply": "[The child] has stated that he doesn't want to go.\n\nThanks.", "context": "The reply followed a written holiday request seeking a clear adult answer and logistics for a July 3 fireworks outing.", "relevance": "Directly records the adult response and child-choice framing. It does not establish how the question was presented, what support was offered, or why the child declined.", "source": "Native Gmail message; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_08_Holiday_request_answered_only_with_the_child_s_stated_refusal_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_08_Holiday_request_answered_only_with_the_child_s_stated_refusal_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 9, "date": "July 12, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19f570be50dbcfc1" ], "threadSubject": "Demand for Immediate Implementation of Parent-Child Contact", "headline": "Categorical denial of exposure; \"I cannot force him to reply\"", "issues": [ "contact", "child-gatekeeper", "disparagement-dispute" ], "reply": "He is not being exposed to anything. He hasn't seen any emails, motions, etc. and we don't talk about you at all. Around him or otherwise. His contact information remains the same. I cannot force him to reply to your messages.\n\n-Amanda", "context": "The reply followed a demand for concrete parent-child contact and a request that the child not be exposed to adult litigation, blame narratives, or disparagement.", "relevance": "Directly records a categorical denial and the stated practical limit. The email does not resolve credibility or what affirmative facilitation occurred.", "source": "Native Gmail message; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_09_Categorical_denial_of_exposure_I_cannot_force_him_to_reply_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_09_Categorical_denial_of_exposure_I_cannot_force_him_to_reply_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 10, "date": "July 12, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19f570c9cbec93bc", "19f5751c65ca26bb" ], "threadSubject": "Courtesy Notice", "headline": "The complete \"I don't care\" / \"if it is directly about the child, I care\" exchange", "issues": [ "communication-tone", "public-accountability-context" ], "reply": "Please stop sending these to me. I really don't care.\n\nIt has nothing to do with [the child]. I just don't care about your ramblings. If it is directly about [the child], I care.", "context": "The first reply was to a public-article courtesy notice. The second reply expressly clarified that the statement was about the article and \"ramblings,\" not indifference toward the child.", "relevance": "The two messages must be presented together. The isolated first sentence must not be represented as an admission that Ms. Morse does not care about the child.", "source": "Two native Gmail messages in the same thread; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_10_The_complete_I_don_t_care_if_it_is_directly_about_the_child_I_care_exchange_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "mixed", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_10_The_complete_I_don_t_care_if_it_is_directly_about_the_child_I_care_exchange_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 11, "date": "July 13, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19f5cded24d43aef" ], "threadSubject": "Immediate Scheduling of In-Person Contact", "headline": "No in-person progression because Ms. Morse had seen no proof of paragraphs 1-3 compliance", "issues": [ "contact", "compliance-filter" ], "reply": "There has been no proof of compliance with paragraphs 1-3, therefore the in person contact hasn't moved forward...", "context": "The reply followed a request for two specific visit dates and a written position that adults, rather than the child, should schedule and facilitate the minimum contact contemplated by the order.", "relevance": "Directly records the asserted reason for non-progression. It does not decide whether compliance had occurred or whether Ms. Morse had unilateral authority to withhold progression.", "source": "Native Gmail message; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_11_No_in_person_progression_because_Ms_Morse_had_seen_no_proof_of_paragraphs_1_3_co_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_11_No_in_person_progression_because_Ms_Morse_had_seen_no_proof_of_paragraphs_1_3_co_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 12, "date": "July 24, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19f94c81ca0e9fb3" ], "threadSubject": "Therapy Appointment Reminder", "headline": "Direct clinical participation declined as unnecessary", "issues": [ "therapy", "adult-coordination" ], "reply": "I speak with Dan periodically by phone, so he has no reason to meet with me.\n\nThanks,\nAmanda", "context": "Justin had invited Ms. Morse to participate in a clinically supervised conversation and offered to wait outside or remain out of the session if the therapist considered that appropriate.", "relevance": "Directly records the stated reason for not attending. It does not establish whether the provider requested or recommended her attendance.", "source": "Native Gmail message; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_12_Direct_clinical_participation_declined_as_unnecessary_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_12_Direct_clinical_participation_declined_as_unnecessary_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 13, "date": "July 29, 2026, 12:27 a.m. ET", "messageIds": [ "19fac205bc1d9123" ], "threadSubject": "August 3 Physical - Time and Location", "headline": "Medical appointment attendance prohibited by Ms. Morse's stated PFA interpretation", "issues": [ "medical-records", "pfa", "parental-access" ], "reply": "The appointment is at 10:30 a.m. at the provider office. You will not be able to attend per the current PFA order.", "context": "The reply followed requests for the time, location, confirmation of attendance, and direct provider listing. The provider location has been omitted from this public derivative.", "relevance": "Directly records a categorical legal position. It does not decide the proper interpretation of the PFA or family order; the operative orders control.", "source": "Native Gmail message; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_13_Medical_appointment_attendance_prohibited_by_Ms_Morse_s_stated_PFA_interpretatio_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_13_Medical_appointment_attendance_prohibited_by_Ms_Morse_s_stated_PFA_interpretatio_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 14, "date": "August 1-2, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19fbfa2ab9796a06", "19fc3604bf15b78a" ], "threadSubject": "Extended-Family Visit Is Not In-Person Contact With Father", "headline": "\"Ramblings,\" \"tantrums,\" and \"look in the mirror\" in a child-contact exchange", "issues": [ "contact", "communication-tone", "disparagement" ], "reply": "Not for nothing, I'm not going to take parenting or maturity advice from you. Clearly it's not working.\n\nParenthood has nothing to do with your online ramblings. If/when you bring up an actual issue that needs addressing, it will be addressed. Your tantrums about the court system and you not getting your way, as well as your opinions about what the order should say or mean is not that.\n\nIf you want to discuss what is and is not being followed accordingly in reference to the February 11, 2026 court order, you have not followed it either. I'm following it to the best of my ability. You're not even trying. Stop emailing me unless it's actually a real life importance regarding our son.\n\nWe literally wouldn't be in this situation if it weren't for your actions towards our son. How are you turning this into being my fault and what I'm doing wrong? Look in the mirror and fix the wrongs that got us here. Apologize to [the child]. Take accountability. Focus on the counseling and understanding how he's feeling through all of your lash outs. Adjust accordingly. Leave me out of it.", "context": "The exchange began with a request to make clear that time with extended family did not substitute for direct father-child contact. Justin later responded with his own pointed criticism and a long list of asserted implementation issues. The native thread contains both sides.", "relevance": "Directly records personal characterizations and blame allocation. It does not decide the merits of either party's account or whether any statement was heard by the child.", "source": "Two native Gmail messages in the same thread; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_14_Ramblings_tantrums_and_look_in_the_mirror_in_a_child_contact_exchange_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_14_Ramblings_tantrums_and_look_in_the_mirror_in_a_child_contact_exchange_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 15, "date": "August 4, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19fcebe5d1881416", "19fcee423200e594" ], "threadSubject": "Medical Office / Child in the Middle", "headline": "Medical-office dispute: denial of involvement followed by \"grow up\" and shame language", "issues": [ "medical-records", "child-narrative", "communication-tone", "disputed-accusation" ], "reply": "Considering he didn't know you were planning to go until you texted him had nothing to do with me. The fact he was uncomfortable with you being there had nothing to do with me. He's allowed to have feelings and to express them. Respect that.\n\nOnce again, I said nothing to him. He read your text and called you. I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. Stop blaming me. I don't talk about you, discuss you or even mention your name. I'm not embarrassed about anything. You're the only one who should be embarrassed and ashamed of your behavior. Grow up please. See our son as the whole human being, with feeling and opinions of his own. He's not 5. You're embarrassing him, and yourself, not me. Think about him when you lash out because I could care less what you do or say, until it hurts [the child].", "context": "These replies followed Justin's accusation that Ms. Morse had placed the child in the middle at a medical appointment. His messages used pointed language including \"shame on you\" and asserted that her embarrassment was earned. The public derivative therefore preserves the reciprocal tone context.", "relevance": "Directly records Ms. Morse's denial, blame response, and personal language. It does not identify the source of the child's belief or adjudicate who caused the medical-office conflict.", "source": "Two native Gmail messages in the same thread; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_15_Medical_office_dispute_denial_of_involvement_followed_by_grow_up_and_shame_langu_PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_15_Medical_office_dispute_denial_of_involvement_followed_by_grow_up_and_shame_langu_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 16, "date": "August 8, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19fe318c426123f3", "19fe31d5a44c563b", "19fe4593fef3d738" ], "threadSubject": "Nearly Six Months of Refusal to Implement", "headline": "No affirmative contact role accepted; reciprocal blame and personal \"path in life\" language", "issues": [ "contact", "child-gatekeeper", "communication-restriction", "communication-tone", "disparagement" ], "reply": "I wasn't aware that you had contacted him therefore I wasn't aware he hadn't replied. How exactly do you propose I keep track of this? Also, how do you propose I force him to reply? Even if I said, \"Ok every day at 6:45 p.m., there will be the allowed electronic contact,\" how exactly do I force him to reply to a text or answer the phone? ... Please stop blaming me for the problems you've caused. I've had enough of the disrespect from you.\n\nAgain, I will give you the necessary information according to the current court order solely pertaining to [the child]'s well being or any emergencies. No other contact between you and I is necessary at this time.\n\nSo you're saying it's my responsibility to make him aware of the love and safety he is supposed to feel toward you? You are his father. It is your responsibility to not make him question that. Had he not been made to feel unsafe or unloved in your presence, we wouldn't be here. No?\n\nSo stop obstructing it and leave me alone. Problem solved. I'm done. Don't email me again. Especially this late at night. Some of us are adults with children and jobs to be responsible for in the morning. Good thing your path in life has gotten you so far... don't mind me if I don't ask for your advice or teachings though. Thanks.", "context": "The sequence followed strongly worded accusations from Justin, including \"get the hell out of the way\" and criticism of Ms. Morse's reading comprehension. The packet preserves that reciprocal tone context rather than presenting the replies as unprovoked.", "relevance": "Directly records a refusal to assume the requested affirmative facilitation role, a limitation of adult-to-adult communication, blame statements, and personal language. It does not determine causation, contempt, or what the child experienced.", "source": "Three native Gmail messages in one thread; public-safe derivative.", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_16_No_affirmative_contact_role_accepted_reciprocal_blame_and_personal_path_in_life__PUBLIC.pdf", "posture": "core-adverse", "classification": "core", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_16_No_affirmative_contact_role_accepted_reciprocal_blame_and_personal_path_in_life__PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 17, "date": "June 6, 2025", "messageIds": [ "19747b418d539d45" ], "threadSubject": "End of school", "headline": "Twice-weekly therapy/contact described as unattainable; Friday set as the only continuing schedule", "issues": [ "therapy", "contact", "schedule constraint" ], "posture": "mixed", "reply": "Per my last email, twice a week would not be attainable at this time. Fridays have been rearranged to accommodate, so keep to that schedule.\n\n-Amanda", "context": "The reply followed a request to increase the frequency of reunification sessions after the school year. Work, transportation, and other obligations were part of the surrounding scheduling discussion.", "relevance": "Directly records a frequency limitation and a single-day schedule. It does not establish that twice-weekly sessions were clinically ordered, practically possible, or intentionally blocked.", "source": "Native Gmail message in the account of Justin Tahai; sender-authenticated metadata; public-safe derivative.", "classification": "supplemental", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_17_Twice_weekly_therapy_contact_described_as_unattainable_Friday_set_as_the_only_continu_PUBLIC.pdf", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_17_Twice_weekly_therapy_contact_described_as_unattainable_Friday_set_as_the_only_continu_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 18, "date": "June 11, 2025", "messageIds": [ "19761ae596a53002" ], "threadSubject": "Appointment 6/13 at 1 p.m.", "headline": "A direct, provider-facing request to reschedule a conflict - counter-record showing ordinary coordination", "issues": [ "therapy", "schedule", "counter-record" ], "posture": "counter-record", "reply": "Hi Dan,\n\nI believe Justin has scheduled an appointment this Friday, 6/13, for 1pm. Unfortunately I just became aware of a scheduling conflict for that time. Do you have any other available time slots on Friday that we may be able to switch it to, providing Justin is also available?\n\nThanks in advance,\nAmanda Morse", "context": "Ms. Morse wrote directly to the reunification therapist and copied Justin. The message sought an alternative time rather than simply cancelling the session.", "relevance": "This cuts against any claim that every scheduling communication was obstructive. It demonstrates that direct coordination sometimes occurred and belongs in a complete record.", "source": "Native Gmail message; sender-authenticated metadata; public-safe derivative.", "classification": "supplemental", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_18_A_direct_provider_facing_request_to_reschedule_a_conflict_counter_record_showing_ordi_PUBLIC.pdf", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_18_A_direct_provider_facing_request_to_reschedule_a_conflict_counter_record_showing_ordi_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 19, "date": "March 4, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19cb973d3ad5e9eb" ], "threadSubject": "Daily Electronic Contact - March 4, 2026", "headline": "A daily-contact request was directed back to the child; the original reply contains an apparent typographical error", "issues": [ "contact", "child gatekeeper", "communication tone" ], "posture": "adverse", "reply": "Text him and ask. I’m my forcing him.\n\n[Apparent typographical error preserved from the native message; the public record does not silently rewrite it.]", "context": "The reply followed a request for a confirmed call time between 6:00 and 8:00 p.m. under the February 11 order.", "relevance": "Directly records that the logistics request was returned to father-child communication rather than answered with an adult-confirmed time. The apparent typo prevents treating the final clause as unambiguous without the full thread.", "source": "Native Gmail message; sender-authenticated metadata; public-safe derivative.", "classification": "supplemental", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_19_A_daily_contact_request_was_directed_back_to_the_child_the_original_reply_contains_an_PUBLIC.pdf", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_19_A_daily_contact_request_was_directed_back_to_the_child_the_original_reply_contains_an_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 20, "date": "March 10, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19cd8c88a97e3248" ], "threadSubject": "Question Regarding the Child", "headline": "A request for explanatory information received the two-sentence answer: “He’s mad at you.”", "issues": [ "communication", "child narrative", "disparagement context" ], "posture": "adverse", "reply": "He’s mad at you.", "context": "Justin had asked whether something had happened because the child’s messages appeared distressed and stated that he wanted to respond supportively. Direct quotations from the child are omitted.", "relevance": "Proves the terse adult response. It does not prove why the child was angry, what the child had said, or whether more explanation was available elsewhere.", "source": "Native Gmail message; sender-authenticated metadata; public-safe derivative.", "classification": "supplemental", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_20_A_request_for_explanatory_information_received_the_two_sentence_answer_He_s_mad_at_yo_PUBLIC.pdf", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_20_A_request_for_explanatory_information_received_the_two_sentence_answer_He_s_mad_at_yo_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 21, "date": "March 31, 2026", "messageIds": [ "19d45bf6b3188432" ], "threadSubject": "ER visit 3/31", "headline": "Same-day emergency medical update - counter-record showing substantive information sharing", "issues": [ "medical", "records", "counter-record" ], "posture": "counter-record", "reply": "[The child] went to the nurse this afternoon with stomach pain. He was sent home early. ... He just got into a room at the ER after a lengthy wait and having his vitals checked. All normal. We’re now waiting to see a medical professional.\n\nThanks,\nAmanda\n\n[Selected minor health details omitted from the public derivative.]", "context": "Ms. Morse provided a contemporaneous update concerning a school-nurse visit, walk-in evaluation, and ER routing. Sensitive health details are not reproduced publicly.", "relevance": "This is material counter-evidence: it shows that useful medical information was sometimes provided promptly. It does not resolve later disputes about follow-up, portal access, records, or appointment participation.", "source": "Native Gmail message; sender-authenticated metadata; public-safe derivative.", "classification": "supplemental", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_21_Same_day_emergency_medical_update_counter_record_showing_substantive_information_shar_PUBLIC.pdf", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_21_Same_day_emergency_medical_update_counter_record_showing_substantive_information_shar_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 22, "date": "April 13, 2026, 10:11 p.m. ET", "messageIds": [ "19d89c2a7f951e5c" ], "threadSubject": "Daily Electronic Contact Under February 11 Order", "headline": "The number and absence of phone restrictions were confirmed, but all contact was still placed at the child’s discretion", "issues": [ "contact", "child gatekeeper", "mixed evidence" ], "posture": "mixed", "reply": "1) His number is [private number omitted]. So if that is the number you have, it is correct.\n\n2) There are no phone restrictions in place other than when he is driving with the instructor.\n\n...\n\n4) Any and all electronic, or otherwise, contact will be at [the child’s] discretion and within his comfort level. ... Respect his boundaries.\n\n-Amanda", "context": "The reply answered part of a four-item logistics request. It confirmed the number and stated that no general phone restriction existed, while declining to establish a daily time and again using child-discretion language.", "relevance": "Mixed evidence. It documents useful logistical information and the continued disputed implementation position in the same message.", "source": "Native Gmail message; sender-authenticated metadata; public-safe derivative.", "classification": "supplemental", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_22_The_number_and_absence_of_phone_restrictions_were_confirmed_but_all_contact_was_still_PUBLIC.pdf", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_22_The_number_and_absence_of_phone_restrictions_were_confirmed_but_all_contact_was_still_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 23, "date": "July 27, 2026, 9:33 a.m. ET", "messageIds": [ "19fa3c7da01c8a67" ], "threadSubject": "FYI", "headline": "Annual-physical notice was provided without the time, office, attendance arrangement, or direct-record information", "issues": [ "medical", "records", "incomplete notice" ], "posture": "adverse", "reply": "[The child] is having his yearly physical scheduled 8/3 with Dr. Vinograd.\nJust fyi", "context": "The initial notice identified a date and provider but omitted the appointment time and office. Those details and direct provider access were requested afterward.", "relevance": "Directly proves the limited content of the first notice. It does not establish whether the omissions were intentional or whether all details were already available from another source.", "source": "Native Gmail message; sender-authenticated metadata; public-safe derivative.", "classification": "supplemental", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_23_Annual_physical_notice_was_provided_without_the_time_office_attendance_arrangement_or_PUBLIC.pdf", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_23_Annual_physical_notice_was_provided_without_the_time_office_attendance_arrangement_or_PUBLIC.pdf" }, { "number": 24, "date": "July 31, 2026, 9:15 p.m. ET", "messageIds": [ "19fbae3c06cbff86" ], "threadSubject": "This ends with our generation.", "headline": "Ms. Morse said she did not read the messages and redirected them to counsel - with the stated volume preserved", "issues": [ "communication restriction", "volume context", "public accountability" ], "posture": "mixed", "reply": "Please Stop sending these to me. Seriously. I don’t read them. And they clog up my inbox. Refer them to my attorney and he can forward any deemed necessary. You’ve sent me 15 emails over a 6 hour span of of time. That’s ridiculous.", "context": "The reply followed a public-accountability message and stated that fifteen emails had arrived in six hours. The exact volume context is included because omitting it would make the refusal-to-read language misleading.", "relevance": "Proves the stated refusal, referral to counsel, and asserted message volume. It does not decide which messages were necessary, whether direct child-related communication could lawfully be refused, or whether the volume was reasonable.", "source": "Native Gmail message; sender-authenticated raw MIME and metadata; public-safe derivative.", "classification": "supplemental", "pdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_24_Ms_Morse_said_she_did_not_read_the_messages_and_redirected_them_to_counsel_with_the_s_PUBLIC.pdf", "individualPdf": "downloads/public-record/amanda-morse-direct-communications/Exhibit_24_Ms_Morse_said_she_did_not_read_the_messages_and_redirected_them_to_counsel_with_the_s_PUBLIC.pdf" } ] }